Efficacy and influencing factors of immunotherapy crossover combined with targeted therapy in advanced esophageal cancer patients following first-line chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy failure.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
American journal of cancer research Pub Date : 2025-03-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.62347/GBOQ6704
Xiuxiu Li, Fan Fan, Ti Zhang
{"title":"Efficacy and influencing factors of immunotherapy crossover combined with targeted therapy in advanced esophageal cancer patients following first-line chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy failure.","authors":"Xiuxiu Li, Fan Fan, Ti Zhang","doi":"10.62347/GBOQ6704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advanced esophageal cancer presents significant treatment challenges, especially after immunochemotherapy failure. This study evaluates the efficacy of further treatment with combination chemotherapy versus combination immunotherapy crossover in terms of tumor regression, quality of life, and identifies factors influencing treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a retrospective case-control study, clinical data from 293 patients with advanced esophageal cancer treated at Shanxi Province Cancer Hospital between February 2021 and February 2023 were analyzed. Patients excluded from radical resection due to failure of first-line immunotherapy were divided into two groups: 95 received combination chemotherapy with Irinotecan and Tigio (S-1, Tegafur/Gimeracil/Oteracil Potassium), and 198 underwent Anlotinib targeted therapy combined with immunotherapy crossover. Treatment efficacy was assessed using tumor regression grading (TRG), and quality of life was evaluated using EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OES18 scales. Potential factors affecting treatment efficacy were examined using multivariate logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline characteristics, including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and history of smoking and alcohol consumption, were comparable between the two groups. TRG showed no significant differences in distribution, with objective response rates of 40% in the Irinotecan/S-1 group and 44.44% in the combined immunotherapy crossover group (P = 0.472). However, quality of life measures indicated superior outcomes from immunotherapy crossover in physical (P = 0.024), emotional (P = 0.002), and general health scores (P = 0.003). Factors negatively impacting treatment success included male gender, smoking, alcohol consumption history, and certain tumor locations. Elevated CEA levels positively correlated with treatment efficacy. Logistic regression analysis identified male gender (OR, 2.109; P = 0.021), smoking (OR, 2.575; P = 0.003), alcohol consumption (OR, 1.995; P = 0.043), and CEA levels (OR, 0.742; P = 0.017) as significant predictors of treatment efficacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Immunotherapy combined with targeted therapy and chemotherapy alone showed comparable efficacy in tumor regression. However, immunotherapy combined with targeted therapy improved certain aspects of quality of life. Factors such as gender, lifestyle habits, and CEA levels can significantly influence treatment outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7437,"journal":{"name":"American journal of cancer research","volume":"15 3","pages":"1321-1334"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11982723/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of cancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/GBOQ6704","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Advanced esophageal cancer presents significant treatment challenges, especially after immunochemotherapy failure. This study evaluates the efficacy of further treatment with combination chemotherapy versus combination immunotherapy crossover in terms of tumor regression, quality of life, and identifies factors influencing treatment outcomes.

Methods: In a retrospective case-control study, clinical data from 293 patients with advanced esophageal cancer treated at Shanxi Province Cancer Hospital between February 2021 and February 2023 were analyzed. Patients excluded from radical resection due to failure of first-line immunotherapy were divided into two groups: 95 received combination chemotherapy with Irinotecan and Tigio (S-1, Tegafur/Gimeracil/Oteracil Potassium), and 198 underwent Anlotinib targeted therapy combined with immunotherapy crossover. Treatment efficacy was assessed using tumor regression grading (TRG), and quality of life was evaluated using EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OES18 scales. Potential factors affecting treatment efficacy were examined using multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Results: Baseline characteristics, including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and history of smoking and alcohol consumption, were comparable between the two groups. TRG showed no significant differences in distribution, with objective response rates of 40% in the Irinotecan/S-1 group and 44.44% in the combined immunotherapy crossover group (P = 0.472). However, quality of life measures indicated superior outcomes from immunotherapy crossover in physical (P = 0.024), emotional (P = 0.002), and general health scores (P = 0.003). Factors negatively impacting treatment success included male gender, smoking, alcohol consumption history, and certain tumor locations. Elevated CEA levels positively correlated with treatment efficacy. Logistic regression analysis identified male gender (OR, 2.109; P = 0.021), smoking (OR, 2.575; P = 0.003), alcohol consumption (OR, 1.995; P = 0.043), and CEA levels (OR, 0.742; P = 0.017) as significant predictors of treatment efficacy.

Conclusion: Immunotherapy combined with targeted therapy and chemotherapy alone showed comparable efficacy in tumor regression. However, immunotherapy combined with targeted therapy improved certain aspects of quality of life. Factors such as gender, lifestyle habits, and CEA levels can significantly influence treatment outcomes.

晚期食管癌一线化疗合并免疫治疗失败后免疫治疗交叉联合靶向治疗的疗效及影响因素
背景:晚期食管癌的治疗面临重大挑战,尤其是在免疫化疗失败后。本研究从肿瘤消退、生活质量和确定影响治疗结果的因素方面评估联合化疗与联合免疫治疗交叉进一步治疗的疗效。方法:采用回顾性病例对照研究,分析山西省肿瘤医院2021年2月至2023年2月293例晚期食管癌患者的临床资料。因一线免疫治疗失败而不能根治性切除的患者分为两组:95例接受伊立替康和Tigio (S-1、替加富/吉美拉西/奥他拉西钾)联合化疗,198例接受安洛替尼靶向治疗联合免疫治疗交叉治疗。采用肿瘤消退分级(TRG)评估治疗效果,采用EORTC QLQ-C30和QLQ-OES18量表评估生活质量。采用多因素logistic回归分析对影响疗效的潜在因素进行分析。结果:基线特征,包括年龄、性别、体重指数(BMI)、吸烟和饮酒史,在两组之间具有可比性。TRG在分布上无显著差异,伊立替康/S-1组客观有效率为40%,联合免疫治疗交叉组客观有效率为44.44% (P = 0.472)。然而,生活质量测量显示,免疫治疗交叉治疗在身体(P = 0.024)、情绪(P = 0.002)和一般健康评分(P = 0.003)方面的结果更好。影响治疗成功的负面因素包括男性性别、吸烟、饮酒史和某些肿瘤位置。CEA水平升高与治疗效果呈正相关。Logistic回归分析确定男性性别(OR, 2.109;P = 0.021),吸烟(OR, 2.575;P = 0.003),酒精摄入量(OR, 1.995;P = 0.043), CEA水平(OR, 0.742;P = 0.017)作为治疗效果的显著预测因子。结论:免疫治疗联合靶向治疗与单独化疗对肿瘤消退的疗效相当。然而,免疫治疗结合靶向治疗改善了生活质量的某些方面。性别、生活习惯和CEA水平等因素可显著影响治疗结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
3.80%
发文量
263
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Cancer Research (AJCR) (ISSN 2156-6976), is an independent open access, online only journal to facilitate rapid dissemination of novel discoveries in basic science and treatment of cancer. It was founded by a group of scientists for cancer research and clinical academic oncologists from around the world, who are devoted to the promotion and advancement of our understanding of the cancer and its treatment. The scope of AJCR is intended to encompass that of multi-disciplinary researchers from any scientific discipline where the primary focus of the research is to increase and integrate knowledge about etiology and molecular mechanisms of carcinogenesis with the ultimate aim of advancing the cure and prevention of this increasingly devastating disease. To achieve these aims AJCR will publish review articles, original articles and new techniques in cancer research and therapy. It will also publish hypothesis, case reports and letter to the editor. Unlike most other open access online journals, AJCR will keep most of the traditional features of paper print that we are all familiar with, such as continuous volume, issue numbers, as well as continuous page numbers to retain our comfortable familiarity towards an academic journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信