Efficacy and influencing factors of immunotherapy crossover combined with targeted therapy in advanced esophageal cancer patients following first-line chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy failure.
{"title":"Efficacy and influencing factors of immunotherapy crossover combined with targeted therapy in advanced esophageal cancer patients following first-line chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy failure.","authors":"Xiuxiu Li, Fan Fan, Ti Zhang","doi":"10.62347/GBOQ6704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advanced esophageal cancer presents significant treatment challenges, especially after immunochemotherapy failure. This study evaluates the efficacy of further treatment with combination chemotherapy versus combination immunotherapy crossover in terms of tumor regression, quality of life, and identifies factors influencing treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a retrospective case-control study, clinical data from 293 patients with advanced esophageal cancer treated at Shanxi Province Cancer Hospital between February 2021 and February 2023 were analyzed. Patients excluded from radical resection due to failure of first-line immunotherapy were divided into two groups: 95 received combination chemotherapy with Irinotecan and Tigio (S-1, Tegafur/Gimeracil/Oteracil Potassium), and 198 underwent Anlotinib targeted therapy combined with immunotherapy crossover. Treatment efficacy was assessed using tumor regression grading (TRG), and quality of life was evaluated using EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OES18 scales. Potential factors affecting treatment efficacy were examined using multivariate logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline characteristics, including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and history of smoking and alcohol consumption, were comparable between the two groups. TRG showed no significant differences in distribution, with objective response rates of 40% in the Irinotecan/S-1 group and 44.44% in the combined immunotherapy crossover group (P = 0.472). However, quality of life measures indicated superior outcomes from immunotherapy crossover in physical (P = 0.024), emotional (P = 0.002), and general health scores (P = 0.003). Factors negatively impacting treatment success included male gender, smoking, alcohol consumption history, and certain tumor locations. Elevated CEA levels positively correlated with treatment efficacy. Logistic regression analysis identified male gender (OR, 2.109; P = 0.021), smoking (OR, 2.575; P = 0.003), alcohol consumption (OR, 1.995; P = 0.043), and CEA levels (OR, 0.742; P = 0.017) as significant predictors of treatment efficacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Immunotherapy combined with targeted therapy and chemotherapy alone showed comparable efficacy in tumor regression. However, immunotherapy combined with targeted therapy improved certain aspects of quality of life. Factors such as gender, lifestyle habits, and CEA levels can significantly influence treatment outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7437,"journal":{"name":"American journal of cancer research","volume":"15 3","pages":"1321-1334"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11982723/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of cancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/GBOQ6704","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Advanced esophageal cancer presents significant treatment challenges, especially after immunochemotherapy failure. This study evaluates the efficacy of further treatment with combination chemotherapy versus combination immunotherapy crossover in terms of tumor regression, quality of life, and identifies factors influencing treatment outcomes.
Methods: In a retrospective case-control study, clinical data from 293 patients with advanced esophageal cancer treated at Shanxi Province Cancer Hospital between February 2021 and February 2023 were analyzed. Patients excluded from radical resection due to failure of first-line immunotherapy were divided into two groups: 95 received combination chemotherapy with Irinotecan and Tigio (S-1, Tegafur/Gimeracil/Oteracil Potassium), and 198 underwent Anlotinib targeted therapy combined with immunotherapy crossover. Treatment efficacy was assessed using tumor regression grading (TRG), and quality of life was evaluated using EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OES18 scales. Potential factors affecting treatment efficacy were examined using multivariate logistic regression analysis.
Results: Baseline characteristics, including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and history of smoking and alcohol consumption, were comparable between the two groups. TRG showed no significant differences in distribution, with objective response rates of 40% in the Irinotecan/S-1 group and 44.44% in the combined immunotherapy crossover group (P = 0.472). However, quality of life measures indicated superior outcomes from immunotherapy crossover in physical (P = 0.024), emotional (P = 0.002), and general health scores (P = 0.003). Factors negatively impacting treatment success included male gender, smoking, alcohol consumption history, and certain tumor locations. Elevated CEA levels positively correlated with treatment efficacy. Logistic regression analysis identified male gender (OR, 2.109; P = 0.021), smoking (OR, 2.575; P = 0.003), alcohol consumption (OR, 1.995; P = 0.043), and CEA levels (OR, 0.742; P = 0.017) as significant predictors of treatment efficacy.
Conclusion: Immunotherapy combined with targeted therapy and chemotherapy alone showed comparable efficacy in tumor regression. However, immunotherapy combined with targeted therapy improved certain aspects of quality of life. Factors such as gender, lifestyle habits, and CEA levels can significantly influence treatment outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Cancer Research (AJCR) (ISSN 2156-6976), is an independent open access, online only journal to facilitate rapid dissemination of novel discoveries in basic science and treatment of cancer. It was founded by a group of scientists for cancer research and clinical academic oncologists from around the world, who are devoted to the promotion and advancement of our understanding of the cancer and its treatment. The scope of AJCR is intended to encompass that of multi-disciplinary researchers from any scientific discipline where the primary focus of the research is to increase and integrate knowledge about etiology and molecular mechanisms of carcinogenesis with the ultimate aim of advancing the cure and prevention of this increasingly devastating disease. To achieve these aims AJCR will publish review articles, original articles and new techniques in cancer research and therapy. It will also publish hypothesis, case reports and letter to the editor. Unlike most other open access online journals, AJCR will keep most of the traditional features of paper print that we are all familiar with, such as continuous volume, issue numbers, as well as continuous page numbers to retain our comfortable familiarity towards an academic journal.