Clinical effects of stannous fluoride dentifrice on peri-implant mucositis, plaque microbiome, and oxidative stress.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
American journal of dentistry Pub Date : 2025-04-01
Malgorzata Klukoska, Niranjan Ramji, Alejandra Muñoz Bodnar, Ping Hu, Hao Ye, Sancai Xie, Lijuan Li, Julie Ashe, Tim Reichling, Jiazhen Wang, Kimberly Milleman, Jeffery Milleman
{"title":"Clinical effects of stannous fluoride dentifrice on peri-implant mucositis, plaque microbiome, and oxidative stress.","authors":"Malgorzata Klukoska, Niranjan Ramji, Alejandra Muñoz Bodnar, Ping Hu, Hao Ye, Sancai Xie, Lijuan Li, Julie Ashe, Tim Reichling, Jiazhen Wang, Kimberly Milleman, Jeffery Milleman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This single-center, single-treatment, 4-week study evaluated the efficacy of a stannous fluoride (SnF₂) dentifrice in reducing peri-implant mucositis while assessing changes in biomarkers and the oral microbiome profile.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>24 healthy participants 18 years of age or older with osseointegrated implants were included, with 19 participants having mucositis and five without mucositis. The non-mucositis participants served as a reference group for microbiome and biomarker assessments (baseline comparison). All participants used the same 0.454% SnF₂ dentifrice (Crest Pro-Health Sensitive and Enamel Shield) and a soft manual toothbrush twice daily throughout the study. Participants received Modified Gingival Index (MGI) and Gingival Bleeding Index (GBI) assessments at Baseline - Day 1 and at Week 4 - Day 1. Subgingival plaque and peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) were collected on Baseline - Day 2 and Week 4 - Day 2 for oxidative stress markers, bacterial endotoxins, proinflammatory cytokines and 16S analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 4 weeks, participants with mucositis experienced a significant reduction from baseline in MGI and GBI scores (63.4% and 79.3%, respectively) and in the number of bleeding sites (72.5% based on GBI analysis). Microbiome analysis of subgingival plaque showed that mucositis was associated with a higher relative abundance of disease-associated genera (Fusobacterium, Porphyromonas, Treponema, and Prevotella) and a lower relative abundance of commensal genera (Rothia and Actinomyces). Alpha diversity was higher in the mucositis group compared to the non-mucositis group at baseline. By Week 4, the profile of participants with mucositis had shifted to align more closely with that of non-mucositis participants. Participants with mucositis showed significant reduction in biomarkers related to bacterial insult, plaque virulence, oxidative stress, and inflammation. Simulated pathway and process analysis revealed that multiple categories of genes were associated with a state of mucositis, and 4 weeks of use of the experimental dentifrice downregulated several virulence-associated genes.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>In participants with mucositis, use of a SnF₂ dentifrice for 4 weeks reduced clinical signs and key biomarkers of peri-implant inflammation and shifted the oral microbiome toward a healthier profile, highlighting the utility of SnF₂ dentifrice in the control of peri-implant mucositis.</p>","PeriodicalId":7538,"journal":{"name":"American journal of dentistry","volume":"38 2","pages":"59-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This single-center, single-treatment, 4-week study evaluated the efficacy of a stannous fluoride (SnF₂) dentifrice in reducing peri-implant mucositis while assessing changes in biomarkers and the oral microbiome profile.

Methods: 24 healthy participants 18 years of age or older with osseointegrated implants were included, with 19 participants having mucositis and five without mucositis. The non-mucositis participants served as a reference group for microbiome and biomarker assessments (baseline comparison). All participants used the same 0.454% SnF₂ dentifrice (Crest Pro-Health Sensitive and Enamel Shield) and a soft manual toothbrush twice daily throughout the study. Participants received Modified Gingival Index (MGI) and Gingival Bleeding Index (GBI) assessments at Baseline - Day 1 and at Week 4 - Day 1. Subgingival plaque and peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) were collected on Baseline - Day 2 and Week 4 - Day 2 for oxidative stress markers, bacterial endotoxins, proinflammatory cytokines and 16S analysis.

Results: After 4 weeks, participants with mucositis experienced a significant reduction from baseline in MGI and GBI scores (63.4% and 79.3%, respectively) and in the number of bleeding sites (72.5% based on GBI analysis). Microbiome analysis of subgingival plaque showed that mucositis was associated with a higher relative abundance of disease-associated genera (Fusobacterium, Porphyromonas, Treponema, and Prevotella) and a lower relative abundance of commensal genera (Rothia and Actinomyces). Alpha diversity was higher in the mucositis group compared to the non-mucositis group at baseline. By Week 4, the profile of participants with mucositis had shifted to align more closely with that of non-mucositis participants. Participants with mucositis showed significant reduction in biomarkers related to bacterial insult, plaque virulence, oxidative stress, and inflammation. Simulated pathway and process analysis revealed that multiple categories of genes were associated with a state of mucositis, and 4 weeks of use of the experimental dentifrice downregulated several virulence-associated genes.

Clinical significance: In participants with mucositis, use of a SnF₂ dentifrice for 4 weeks reduced clinical signs and key biomarkers of peri-implant inflammation and shifted the oral microbiome toward a healthier profile, highlighting the utility of SnF₂ dentifrice in the control of peri-implant mucositis.

氟化亚锡牙膏对种植体周围黏膜炎、菌斑微生物组和氧化应激的临床影响。
目的:这项单中心、单治疗、为期4周的研究评估了氟化亚锡(SnF 2)牙膏在减少种植周黏膜炎方面的疗效,同时评估了生物标志物和口腔微生物群的变化。方法:纳入24例18岁及以上的健康受试者,其中19例患有粘膜炎,5例无粘膜炎。非粘膜炎参与者作为微生物组和生物标志物评估的参照组(基线比较)。在整个研究过程中,所有参与者每天两次使用相同的0.454% SnF₂牙膏(佳洁士Pro-Health Sensitive和珐琅Shield)和柔软的手动牙刷。受试者在基线第1天和第4周第1天接受改良牙龈指数(MGI)和牙龈出血指数(GBI)评估。在基线第2天和第4周第2天收集龈下菌斑和种植体周围沟液(PICF),进行氧化应激标志物、细菌内毒素、促炎细胞因子和16S分析。结果:4周后,粘膜炎患者的MGI和GBI评分(分别为63.4%和79.3%)和出血部位数量(根据GBI分析,为72.5%)较基线显著降低。龈下菌斑的微生物组分析显示,粘膜炎与较高的疾病相关属(梭杆菌、卟啉单胞菌、密螺旋体和普雷沃菌)和较低的共生属(罗氏菌和放线菌)的相对丰度相关。与非粘膜炎组相比,粘膜炎组的α多样性在基线时更高。到第4周,患有粘膜炎的参与者的情况已经转变为与非粘膜炎参与者的情况更加接近。患有黏膜炎的参与者显示出与细菌损伤、斑块毒力、氧化应激和炎症相关的生物标志物显著减少。模拟途径和过程分析显示,多种类型的基因与粘膜炎状态相关,并且使用实验牙膏4周后下调了几种毒力相关基因。临床意义:在患有粘膜炎的参与者中,使用SnF 2牙膏4周可减少临床体征和种植体周围炎症的关键生物标志物,并将口腔微生物群转向更健康的状态,突出了SnF 2牙膏在控制种植体周围粘膜炎中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of dentistry
American journal of dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Dentistry, published by Mosher & Linder, Inc., provides peer-reviewed scientific articles with clinical significance for the general dental practitioner.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信