{"title":"The Future of Psychosocial Supports in Australia- Are the Recommendations from the National Disability Insurance Scheme Review the Answer?","authors":"Tania Shelby-James, Megan Rattray","doi":"10.1007/s10597-025-01467-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The introduction of the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) in 2013 and the resulting changes in mainstream funding for psychosocial supports have led to disparities in funding between the two existing systems. Currently, people supported under the NDIS receive significantly more funding compared to those supported through federal and state programs. The NDIS review has highlighted this inequity, prompting a commitment to increase state and federal funding for foundational psychosocial supports. However, the specifics of this funding remain unclear. This article synthesises and critically evaluates the recent NDIS review recommendations relating to psychosocial disability and makes recommendations on how both systems could be enhanced to ensure equitable and accessible psychosocial support provision in Australia.</p>","PeriodicalId":10654,"journal":{"name":"Community Mental Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community Mental Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-025-01467-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The introduction of the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) in 2013 and the resulting changes in mainstream funding for psychosocial supports have led to disparities in funding between the two existing systems. Currently, people supported under the NDIS receive significantly more funding compared to those supported through federal and state programs. The NDIS review has highlighted this inequity, prompting a commitment to increase state and federal funding for foundational psychosocial supports. However, the specifics of this funding remain unclear. This article synthesises and critically evaluates the recent NDIS review recommendations relating to psychosocial disability and makes recommendations on how both systems could be enhanced to ensure equitable and accessible psychosocial support provision in Australia.
期刊介绍：
Community Mental Health Journal focuses on the needs of people experiencing serious forms of psychological distress, as well as the structures established to address those needs. Areas of particular interest include critical examination of current paradigms of diagnosis and treatment, socio-structural determinants of mental health, social hierarchies within the public mental health systems, and the intersection of public mental health programs and social/racial justice and health equity. While this is the journal of the American Association for Community Psychiatry, we welcome manuscripts reflecting research from a range of disciplines on recovery-oriented services, public health policy, clinical delivery systems, advocacy, and emerging and innovative practices.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
