Impact of telemental health on suicide prevention care in U.S. emergency departments.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Stephanie K Doupnik, Cadence F Bowden, Diana Worsley, Cameron Keating, Ashley A Foster, William Quarshie, Jungwon Min, Paul Schulz, Ilmul Jahan Tani, Zachary Meisel, Steven C Marcus
{"title":"Impact of telemental health on suicide prevention care in U.S. emergency departments.","authors":"Stephanie K Doupnik, Cadence F Bowden, Diana Worsley, Cameron Keating, Ashley A Foster, William Quarshie, Jungwon Min, Paul Schulz, Ilmul Jahan Tani, Zachary Meisel, Steven C Marcus","doi":"10.1111/acem.70055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mental health concerns are the reason for 7% of U.S. emergency department (ED) visits, and telehealth is increasingly used to provide emergency mental health care. Rural, critical-access hospitals have limited access to in-person mental health care. We sought to describe telemental health care programs in U.S. EDs and test whether access to telemental health care affects use of suicide prevention practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional survey of telemental health care and suicide prevention practices at a nationally representative sample of all U.S. EDs associated with acute care general medical hospitals. We used proportionate allocation and nonresponse weighting to generate national estimates. We used weighted adjusted logistic regression models to measure associations between an ED's access to telemental health care and use of six recommended suicide-prevention practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 606 of 977 eligible EDs completed the survey (62% response rate), weighted to represent 4321 EDs nationally. Telemental health care was used in 68% of EDs, and rural, smaller-volume, and critical-access EDs were more likely to use telemental health care. Critical-access hospitals were more likely to use telemental health care 24/7 and less likely to have access to a telehealth psychiatrist or electronic health record (EHR)-based information sharing. With structural differences being adjusted for, EDs with telemental health care were more likely to assess patients' suicidal intent or plans (adjusted risk ratio [ARR] 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-1.14) and access to lethal means (ARR 1.13, 95% CI 1.01-1.26). Critical-access EDs with telemental health care were also more likely to provide lethal means safety counseling (ARR 2.11, 95% CI 1.14-3.89).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Telemental health care is widely used across all types of EDs, and EDs with telemental health care are more likely to use suicide prevention practices. Critical-access hospitals rely on telemental health care to a great extent and need better access to telehealth psychiatry and EHR information sharing.</p>","PeriodicalId":7105,"journal":{"name":"Academic Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.70055","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mental health concerns are the reason for 7% of U.S. emergency department (ED) visits, and telehealth is increasingly used to provide emergency mental health care. Rural, critical-access hospitals have limited access to in-person mental health care. We sought to describe telemental health care programs in U.S. EDs and test whether access to telemental health care affects use of suicide prevention practices.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of telemental health care and suicide prevention practices at a nationally representative sample of all U.S. EDs associated with acute care general medical hospitals. We used proportionate allocation and nonresponse weighting to generate national estimates. We used weighted adjusted logistic regression models to measure associations between an ED's access to telemental health care and use of six recommended suicide-prevention practices.

Results: A total of 606 of 977 eligible EDs completed the survey (62% response rate), weighted to represent 4321 EDs nationally. Telemental health care was used in 68% of EDs, and rural, smaller-volume, and critical-access EDs were more likely to use telemental health care. Critical-access hospitals were more likely to use telemental health care 24/7 and less likely to have access to a telehealth psychiatrist or electronic health record (EHR)-based information sharing. With structural differences being adjusted for, EDs with telemental health care were more likely to assess patients' suicidal intent or plans (adjusted risk ratio [ARR] 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-1.14) and access to lethal means (ARR 1.13, 95% CI 1.01-1.26). Critical-access EDs with telemental health care were also more likely to provide lethal means safety counseling (ARR 2.11, 95% CI 1.14-3.89).

Conclusions: Telemental health care is widely used across all types of EDs, and EDs with telemental health care are more likely to use suicide prevention practices. Critical-access hospitals rely on telemental health care to a great extent and need better access to telehealth psychiatry and EHR information sharing.

远程心理健康对美国急诊科自杀预防护理的影响
背景:心理健康问题是美国急诊科(ED)就诊的7%的原因,远程医疗越来越多地用于提供紧急心理卫生保健。农村重症医院获得面对面精神保健的机会有限。我们试图描述美国急诊科的远程心理保健项目,并测试远程心理保健是否会影响自杀预防实践的使用。方法:我们在全美所有与急症护理综合医院相关的急症科急诊科进行了一项远程医疗保健和自杀预防实践的横断面调查。我们使用比例分配和非响应加权来产生国家估计。我们使用加权调整的逻辑回归模型来衡量急诊科获得远程卫生保健和使用六种推荐的自杀预防措施之间的关系。结果:977名合格的急诊医生中有606名完成了调查(62%的回复率),加权后代表全国4321名急诊医生。68%的急诊科使用了远程心理保健,农村、小容量急诊科和关键通道急诊科更有可能使用远程心理保健。关键通道医院更有可能使用24/7远程心理保健,而不太可能获得远程保健精神病医生或基于电子健康记录(EHR)的信息共享。在调整了结构差异后,接受过远程精神卫生保健的急诊科更有可能评估患者的自杀意图或计划(调整风险比[ARR] 1.07, 95%可信区间[CI] 1.10-1.14)和获取致命手段(ARR 1.13, 95% CI 1.01-1.26)。具有远程精神卫生保健的急诊科也更有可能提供致命手段安全咨询(ARR 2.11, 95% CI 1.14-3.89)。结论:远程心理保健在所有类型的急诊科中都得到了广泛的应用,有远程心理保健的急诊科更有可能采取自杀预防措施。关键通道医院在很大程度上依赖远程卫生保健,需要更好地获得远程卫生精神病学和电子病历信息共享。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Emergency Medicine
Academic Emergency Medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.80%
发文量
207
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Emergency Medicine (AEM) is the official monthly publication of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) and publishes information relevant to the practice, educational advancements, and investigation of emergency medicine. It is the second-largest peer-reviewed scientific journal in the specialty of emergency medicine. The goal of AEM is to advance the science, education, and clinical practice of emergency medicine, to serve as a voice for the academic emergency medicine community, and to promote SAEM''s goals and objectives. Members and non-members worldwide depend on this journal for translational medicine relevant to emergency medicine, as well as for clinical news, case studies and more. Each issue contains information relevant to the research, educational advancements, and practice in emergency medicine. Subject matter is diverse, including preclinical studies, clinical topics, health policy, and educational methods. The research of SAEM members contributes significantly to the scientific content and development of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信