The Efficacy and Safety of GLP-1 RAs in the Modification of Cardiovascular Morbidity in Patients with Obesity Without Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Involving 32,884 Patients.
Mohammad Tanashat, Yazan A Al-Ajlouni, Mohamed Abuelazm, Obieda Altobaishat, Almothana Manasrah, Mustafa Turkmani, Ubaid Khan, Mohamed Abouzid
{"title":"The Efficacy and Safety of GLP-1 RAs in the Modification of Cardiovascular Morbidity in Patients with Obesity Without Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Involving 32,884 Patients.","authors":"Mohammad Tanashat, Yazan A Al-Ajlouni, Mohamed Abuelazm, Obieda Altobaishat, Almothana Manasrah, Mustafa Turkmani, Ubaid Khan, Mohamed Abouzid","doi":"10.1007/s40256-025-00726-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although the cardioprotective effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are well documented in patients with diabetes mellitus, their impact on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with obesity without diabetes remains under debate. Therefore, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to investigate the effects of GLP-1 RAs on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with obesity without diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases through December 26, 2023. We pooled dichotomous data using risk ratios (RRs) and continuous data using mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We evaluated the quality of each study using the Cochrane RoB2 method, and the study protocol was registered on PROSPERO ID: CRD42024498538.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 19 RCTs with a total of 32,884 patients. Of these, 15 had a low overall risk of bias, two raised concerns, and two had a high risk of bias. There was no difference between GLP-1 RAs and placebo regarding cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.85; 95% CI 0.71-1.01; p = 0.07). However, compared with placebo, GLP-1 RAs significantly decreased the incidence of all-cause mortality (RR 0.82; 95% CI 0.72-0.93; p < 0.0001), non-cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.77; 95% CI 0.63-0.95; p = 0.01), and myocardial infarction (RR 0.73; 95% CI 0.62-0.86; p < 0.0001). Additionally, patients receiving GLP-1 RAs experienced significant overall weight loss (- 8.53 kg; 95% CI - 12.38 to - 4.68; p < 0.0001) and improvements in lipid profiles, including lower levels of total cholesterol (- 0.77 %; 95% CI - 1.03 to - 0.50; p < 0.0001), triglycerides (- 6.78 %; 95% CI - 8.11 to - 5.46; p < 0.0001), low-density lipoproteins (- 2.85 %; 95% CI - 3.74 to - 1.96; p < 0.0001), and very low-density lipoproteins (- 4.47 %; 95% CI - 5.56 to - 3.38; p < 0.0001). GLP-1 RAs also significantly increased the incidence of any adverse events (RR 1.11; 95% CI 1.05-1.16; p < 0.0001), with no difference regarding the incidence of serious adverse events. However, gastrointestinal adverse events were significantly more frequent in patients receiving GLP-1 RAs, with a higher risk of any gastrointestinal adverse events (RR 2.83; 95% CI 1.86-4.3; p < 0.001), nausea (RR 2.70; 95% CI 2.18-3.33; p < 0.001), diarrhea (RR 1.97; 95% CI 1.68-2.31; p < 0.001), vomiting (RR 3.85; 95% CI 3.32-4.48; p < 0.001), and constipation (RR 2.35; 95% CI 1.94-2.85; p < 0.001) than in those receiving placebo.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In obese patients without diabetes, GLP-1 RAs demonstrated substantial benefits in reducing cardiovascular risks, including all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction, and effectively promoted weight loss and improved lipid profiles and blood pressure control. However, their use is accompanied by a higher incidence of gastrointestinal adverse effects and heterogeneity in outcomes, highlighting the need for individualized treatment approaches.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>PROSPERO identifier number: CRD42024498538.</p>","PeriodicalId":7652,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40256-025-00726-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Although the cardioprotective effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are well documented in patients with diabetes mellitus, their impact on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with obesity without diabetes remains under debate. Therefore, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to investigate the effects of GLP-1 RAs on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with obesity without diabetes.
Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases through December 26, 2023. We pooled dichotomous data using risk ratios (RRs) and continuous data using mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We evaluated the quality of each study using the Cochrane RoB2 method, and the study protocol was registered on PROSPERO ID: CRD42024498538.
Results: We included 19 RCTs with a total of 32,884 patients. Of these, 15 had a low overall risk of bias, two raised concerns, and two had a high risk of bias. There was no difference between GLP-1 RAs and placebo regarding cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.85; 95% CI 0.71-1.01; p = 0.07). However, compared with placebo, GLP-1 RAs significantly decreased the incidence of all-cause mortality (RR 0.82; 95% CI 0.72-0.93; p < 0.0001), non-cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.77; 95% CI 0.63-0.95; p = 0.01), and myocardial infarction (RR 0.73; 95% CI 0.62-0.86; p < 0.0001). Additionally, patients receiving GLP-1 RAs experienced significant overall weight loss (- 8.53 kg; 95% CI - 12.38 to - 4.68; p < 0.0001) and improvements in lipid profiles, including lower levels of total cholesterol (- 0.77 %; 95% CI - 1.03 to - 0.50; p < 0.0001), triglycerides (- 6.78 %; 95% CI - 8.11 to - 5.46; p < 0.0001), low-density lipoproteins (- 2.85 %; 95% CI - 3.74 to - 1.96; p < 0.0001), and very low-density lipoproteins (- 4.47 %; 95% CI - 5.56 to - 3.38; p < 0.0001). GLP-1 RAs also significantly increased the incidence of any adverse events (RR 1.11; 95% CI 1.05-1.16; p < 0.0001), with no difference regarding the incidence of serious adverse events. However, gastrointestinal adverse events were significantly more frequent in patients receiving GLP-1 RAs, with a higher risk of any gastrointestinal adverse events (RR 2.83; 95% CI 1.86-4.3; p < 0.001), nausea (RR 2.70; 95% CI 2.18-3.33; p < 0.001), diarrhea (RR 1.97; 95% CI 1.68-2.31; p < 0.001), vomiting (RR 3.85; 95% CI 3.32-4.48; p < 0.001), and constipation (RR 2.35; 95% CI 1.94-2.85; p < 0.001) than in those receiving placebo.
Conclusion: In obese patients without diabetes, GLP-1 RAs demonstrated substantial benefits in reducing cardiovascular risks, including all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction, and effectively promoted weight loss and improved lipid profiles and blood pressure control. However, their use is accompanied by a higher incidence of gastrointestinal adverse effects and heterogeneity in outcomes, highlighting the need for individualized treatment approaches.
期刊介绍:
Promoting rational therapy within the discipline of cardiology, the American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs covers all aspects of the treatment of cardiovascular disorders, particularly the place in therapy of newer and established agents.
Via a program of reviews and original clinical research articles, the journal addresses major issues relating to treatment of these disorders, including the pharmacology, efficacy and adverse effects of the major classes of drugs; information on newly developed drugs and drug classes; the therapeutic implications of latest research into the aetiology of cardiovascular disorders; and the practical management of specific clinical situations.
The American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs offers a range of additional enhanced features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by a Key Points summary, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist patients, caregivers and others in understanding important medical advances. The journal also provides the option to include various other types of enhanced features including slide sets, videos and animations. All enhanced features are peer reviewed to the same high standard as the article itself. Peer review is conducted using Editorial Manager®, supported by a database of international experts. This database is shared with other Adis journals.