Relationship between Tranexamic Acid Use and Safety in Patients with Acute Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Mortality and Thromboembolic Events.

IF 7.4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Seungjoo Lee, Moinay Kim, Sae Min Kwon, Min-Yong Kwon, Chang-Hyun Kim, Nak-Hoon Son, Jae Hyun Kim
{"title":"Relationship between Tranexamic Acid Use and Safety in Patients with Acute Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Mortality and Thromboembolic Events.","authors":"Seungjoo Lee, Moinay Kim, Sae Min Kwon, Min-Yong Kwon, Chang-Hyun Kim, Nak-Hoon Son, Jae Hyun Kim","doi":"10.1007/s40263-025-01185-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tranexamic acid (TXA) is widely used to manage acute brain injuries, including subarachnoid hemorrhage, intracerebral hemorrhage, and traumatic brain injury. Despite its common usage, there is limited evidence on its safety in these conditions. We aimed to evaluate the impact of TXA on mortality and thromboembolic events in patients with acute brain injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted from inception to May 2024. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing TXA with placebo in patients aged 15 years or older with confirmed acute brain injury. Two reviewers independently assessed study quality using the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and extracted data on patient demographics, intervention details, and outcomes, including mortality, thromboembolic events, and seizures. Meta-analyses were performed using random effects models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five RCTs with 16,677 participants (8584 TXA, 8093 control) were included. The relative risk (RR) for overall mortality was 0.96 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.91-1.03, p = 0.2433), indicating a nonsignificant difference between the groups, with no substantial heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 0% [0-45%]). Additionally, no significant differences were observed in 30-, 90-, or 180-day mortality. The RR for total thromboembolic events was 1.11 (95% CI 0.97-1.28, p = 0.1236), indicating a nonsignificant difference between the groups, with low heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 15% [0-51%]). Similarly, no significant differences were observed in the incidences of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack, acute coronary syndrome or myocardial infarction, or seizures. However, the administration of TXA for more than 1 day was associated with a significant increase in thromboembolic events (RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.03-1.44). Administering TXA beyond 8 h of injury was also associated with a significant increase in thromboembolic events (RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.02-1.33).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TXA administration does not significantly affect overall mortality or increase the risk of thromboembolic events in patients with acute brain injuries. However, prolonged use or delayed administration may be associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events. These findings highlight the need for careful consideration of the duration and timing of TXA administration in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":10508,"journal":{"name":"CNS drugs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CNS drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40263-025-01185-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Tranexamic acid (TXA) is widely used to manage acute brain injuries, including subarachnoid hemorrhage, intracerebral hemorrhage, and traumatic brain injury. Despite its common usage, there is limited evidence on its safety in these conditions. We aimed to evaluate the impact of TXA on mortality and thromboembolic events in patients with acute brain injury.

Methods: A systematic search of MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted from inception to May 2024. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing TXA with placebo in patients aged 15 years or older with confirmed acute brain injury. Two reviewers independently assessed study quality using the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and extracted data on patient demographics, intervention details, and outcomes, including mortality, thromboembolic events, and seizures. Meta-analyses were performed using random effects models.

Results: Twenty-five RCTs with 16,677 participants (8584 TXA, 8093 control) were included. The relative risk (RR) for overall mortality was 0.96 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.91-1.03, p = 0.2433), indicating a nonsignificant difference between the groups, with no substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 0% [0-45%]). Additionally, no significant differences were observed in 30-, 90-, or 180-day mortality. The RR for total thromboembolic events was 1.11 (95% CI 0.97-1.28, p = 0.1236), indicating a nonsignificant difference between the groups, with low heterogeneity (I2 = 15% [0-51%]). Similarly, no significant differences were observed in the incidences of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack, acute coronary syndrome or myocardial infarction, or seizures. However, the administration of TXA for more than 1 day was associated with a significant increase in thromboembolic events (RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.03-1.44). Administering TXA beyond 8 h of injury was also associated with a significant increase in thromboembolic events (RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.02-1.33).

Conclusions: TXA administration does not significantly affect overall mortality or increase the risk of thromboembolic events in patients with acute brain injuries. However, prolonged use or delayed administration may be associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events. These findings highlight the need for careful consideration of the duration and timing of TXA administration in clinical practice.

急性脑损伤患者使用氨甲环酸与安全性的关系:死亡率和血栓栓塞事件的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:氨甲环酸(TXA)被广泛用于治疗急性脑损伤,包括蛛网膜下腔出血、脑出血和外伤性脑损伤。尽管它被普遍使用,但在这些条件下其安全性的证据有限。我们的目的是评估TXA对急性脑损伤患者死亡率和血栓栓塞事件的影响。方法:系统检索MEDLINE/PubMed、Embase和Cochrane中央对照试验注册库(Central Register of Controlled Trials),检索时间自成立至2024年5月。我们纳入了比较15岁及以上确诊急性脑损伤患者TXA与安慰剂的随机对照试验(rct)。两位审稿人使用修订后的Cochrane偏倚风险工具独立评估了研究质量,并提取了患者人口统计学、干预细节和结局(包括死亡率、血栓栓塞事件和癫痫发作)的数据。采用随机效应模型进行meta分析。结果:纳入25项随机对照试验,共16,677名受试者(8584名TXA, 8093名对照)。总死亡率的相对危险度(RR)为0.96(95%可信区间(CI) 0.91-1.03, p = 0.2433),组间差异不显著,不存在显著异质性(I2 = 0%[0-45%])。此外,在30天、90天或180天的死亡率中没有观察到显著差异。总血栓栓塞事件的RR为1.11 (95% CI 0.97-1.28, p = 0.1236),组间差异无统计学意义,异质性较低(I2 = 15%[0-51%])。同样,在深静脉血栓形成或肺栓塞、缺血性卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作、急性冠状动脉综合征或心肌梗死、癫痫发作的发生率方面,两组间无显著差异。然而,使用TXA超过1天与血栓栓塞事件显著增加相关(RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.03-1.44)。在损伤后8小时给予TXA也与血栓栓塞事件的显著增加相关(RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.02-1.33)。结论:TXA给药不会显著影响急性脑损伤患者的总死亡率或增加血栓栓塞事件的风险。然而,长期使用或延迟给药可能与血栓栓塞事件的风险增加有关。这些发现强调在临床实践中需要仔细考虑TXA给药的持续时间和时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CNS drugs
CNS drugs 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
82
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: CNS Drugs promotes rational pharmacotherapy within the disciplines of clinical psychiatry and neurology. The Journal includes: - Overviews of contentious or emerging issues. - Comprehensive narrative reviews that provide an authoritative source of information on pharmacological approaches to managing neurological and psychiatric illnesses. - Systematic reviews that collate empirical evidence to answer a specific research question, using explicit, systematic methods as outlined by the PRISMA statement. - Adis Drug Reviews of the properties and place in therapy of both newer and established drugs in neurology and psychiatry. - Original research articles reporting the results of well-designed studies with a strong link to clinical practice, such as clinical pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic studies, clinical trials, meta-analyses, outcomes research, and pharmacoeconomic and pharmacoepidemiological studies. Additional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in CNS Drugs may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信