Blood product use in paediatric trauma: lessons from the TARN data.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Kathryn Mullan, Peter McAlister, Shane Michael Mc Veigh, Sophie Jones, Omar Bouamra, Fiona Lecky, Stephen Mullen
{"title":"Blood product use in paediatric trauma: lessons from the TARN data.","authors":"Kathryn Mullan, Peter McAlister, Shane Michael Mc Veigh, Sophie Jones, Omar Bouamra, Fiona Lecky, Stephen Mullen","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2024-214397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trauma contributes significantly to childhood morbidity and mortality. Uncontrolled haemorrhage leading to cardiovascular collapse remains the leading cause of preventable death in paediatric trauma. Evidence to support the early and accurate identification of paediatric trauma patients requiring blood products is growing. Consensus guidelines advocating for more liberal blood product use based on the concept of damage control resuscitation and the introduction of risk predictor tools to identify children requiring resuscitation with blood products may have altered use in recent years. We aimed to identify trends in blood product prescribing practice in paediatric trauma resuscitation over the last decade.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective, observational study, data were abstracted from Trauma Audit Research Network (TARN) from sites in England, Wales and Northern Ireland over a 10-year period (2012-2021). Eligible cases were defined as injured children or young people aged less than 16 years who received blood products, including in the prehospital environment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 2.5% (n=678) of injured children received blood products within 24 hours of hospital arrival, including the prehospital environment. Blood product administration over the study period remained largely unchanged (p=0.190). Over the 10-year period, we saw a significant increase in blood product use among paediatric trauma patients of increasing age and those with penetrating injuries (p<0.03). By contrast, there was a decrease in blood product use across the same 10-year period among paediatric trauma related to road traffic collisions (p=0.01). On analysing the paediatric trauma population that received blood products, the distribution across locations can be seen as follows: 60.5% received blood products at the scene of the incident, 25% in the ED and 12.8% in critical care settings. The most common blood product given was packed red blood cells (84%), with fresh frozen plasma, platelets and cryoprecipitate administered in 9.7%, 2.4% and 1.6% of cases, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>UK trauma centres have not significantly changed blood product use in paediatric trauma over the last decade. Monitoring and understanding national blood product use in paediatric trauma is integral to understanding trends and current practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"662-668"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2024-214397","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Trauma contributes significantly to childhood morbidity and mortality. Uncontrolled haemorrhage leading to cardiovascular collapse remains the leading cause of preventable death in paediatric trauma. Evidence to support the early and accurate identification of paediatric trauma patients requiring blood products is growing. Consensus guidelines advocating for more liberal blood product use based on the concept of damage control resuscitation and the introduction of risk predictor tools to identify children requiring resuscitation with blood products may have altered use in recent years. We aimed to identify trends in blood product prescribing practice in paediatric trauma resuscitation over the last decade.

Methods: In this retrospective, observational study, data were abstracted from Trauma Audit Research Network (TARN) from sites in England, Wales and Northern Ireland over a 10-year period (2012-2021). Eligible cases were defined as injured children or young people aged less than 16 years who received blood products, including in the prehospital environment.

Results: During the study period, 2.5% (n=678) of injured children received blood products within 24 hours of hospital arrival, including the prehospital environment. Blood product administration over the study period remained largely unchanged (p=0.190). Over the 10-year period, we saw a significant increase in blood product use among paediatric trauma patients of increasing age and those with penetrating injuries (p<0.03). By contrast, there was a decrease in blood product use across the same 10-year period among paediatric trauma related to road traffic collisions (p=0.01). On analysing the paediatric trauma population that received blood products, the distribution across locations can be seen as follows: 60.5% received blood products at the scene of the incident, 25% in the ED and 12.8% in critical care settings. The most common blood product given was packed red blood cells (84%), with fresh frozen plasma, platelets and cryoprecipitate administered in 9.7%, 2.4% and 1.6% of cases, respectively.

Conclusion: UK trauma centres have not significantly changed blood product use in paediatric trauma over the last decade. Monitoring and understanding national blood product use in paediatric trauma is integral to understanding trends and current practice.

血液制品在儿科创伤中的使用:来自TARN数据的教训。
背景:创伤是儿童发病率和死亡率的重要因素。不受控制的出血导致心血管衰竭仍然是儿科创伤中可预防死亡的主要原因。支持早期和准确识别需要血液制品的儿科创伤患者的证据正在增加。基于损害控制复苏的概念,倡导更自由地使用血液制品的共识指南,以及引入风险预测工具来识别需要使用血液制品进行复苏的儿童,这可能改变了近年来的使用情况。我们的目的是确定在过去十年中儿科创伤复苏血液制品处方实践的趋势。方法:在这项回顾性观察性研究中,从英格兰、威尔士和北爱尔兰的创伤审计研究网络(TARN)中提取了10年(2012-2021年)的数据。符合条件的病例被定义为接受血液制品的受伤儿童或16岁以下的年轻人,包括在院前环境中。结果:在研究期间,2.5% (n=678)的受伤儿童在到达医院24小时内接受了血液制品,包括院前环境。在研究期间,血液制品的使用基本保持不变(p=0.190)。在过去的10年里,我们发现年龄增长的儿科创伤患者和那些有穿透性损伤的患者使用血液制品的数量显著增加(结论:英国创伤中心在过去的10年里没有显著改变儿科创伤的血液制品使用。)监测和了解国家血液制品在儿科创伤中的使用情况对于了解趋势和当前做法是不可或缺的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Journal
Emergency Medicine Journal 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
262
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Emergency Medicine Journal is a leading international journal reporting developments and advances in emergency medicine and acute care. It has relevance to all specialties involved in the management of emergencies in the hospital and prehospital environment. Each issue contains editorials, reviews, original research, evidence based reviews, letters and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信