Venous thromboembolic risk in hematological hospitalized patients: a retrospective study.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Annals of Hematology Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-06 DOI:10.1007/s00277-025-06397-9
Stefano Cordella, Valeria Coluccio, Riccardo Cuoghi Costantini, Roberto D'Amico, Mario Luppi, Marco Marietta
{"title":"Venous thromboembolic risk in hematological hospitalized patients: a retrospective study.","authors":"Stefano Cordella, Valeria Coluccio, Riccardo Cuoghi Costantini, Roberto D'Amico, Mario Luppi, Marco Marietta","doi":"10.1007/s00277-025-06397-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although patients with hematological malignancies carry a non-negligible risk of venous thromboembolic events (VTE), no risk assessment models (RAMs) have been developed and validated to predict this risk during their hospital stay. Moreover, the performance of RAMs developed to predict the thromboembolic and hemorrhagic risk in hospitalized medical patients has never been assessed in this specific population. In this observational study we sought to assess the incidence of VTE and hemorrhagic events (HE), to evaluate pharmacological prophylaxis use, and to test existing RAMs for TE and HE (Padua Predictions Score, PPS, and Improve Bleeding Score, IBS, respectively) in a population of 514 hematological patients at their first hospital admission. 165 patients were found to be at high thromboembolic and 114 at high hemorrhagic risk according to PPS and IBS; a total of 148 patients received pharmacological prophylaxis with low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH). An incidence of VTE (3.11%) and HE (1.75%) was found, with most thrombotic (15/16) and hemorrhagic (8/9) events occurring in patients not receiving prophylaxis. At the univariate analysis, the diagnosis of acute leukemia was significantly associated with an increased risk of VTE, whereas prophylaxis was found to be protective. However, at the multivariate analysis the statistical significance was lost for both of these variables (HR = 2.76, p = 0.218 and HR = 0.22, p = 0.170, respectively). PPS poorly performed in this population, but no other factors associated with VTE were found. Larger, multicenter studies to develop better RAMs tailored to HM patients are needed to improve VTE management in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":8068,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Hematology","volume":" ","pages":"2963-2971"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12141132/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-025-06397-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although patients with hematological malignancies carry a non-negligible risk of venous thromboembolic events (VTE), no risk assessment models (RAMs) have been developed and validated to predict this risk during their hospital stay. Moreover, the performance of RAMs developed to predict the thromboembolic and hemorrhagic risk in hospitalized medical patients has never been assessed in this specific population. In this observational study we sought to assess the incidence of VTE and hemorrhagic events (HE), to evaluate pharmacological prophylaxis use, and to test existing RAMs for TE and HE (Padua Predictions Score, PPS, and Improve Bleeding Score, IBS, respectively) in a population of 514 hematological patients at their first hospital admission. 165 patients were found to be at high thromboembolic and 114 at high hemorrhagic risk according to PPS and IBS; a total of 148 patients received pharmacological prophylaxis with low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH). An incidence of VTE (3.11%) and HE (1.75%) was found, with most thrombotic (15/16) and hemorrhagic (8/9) events occurring in patients not receiving prophylaxis. At the univariate analysis, the diagnosis of acute leukemia was significantly associated with an increased risk of VTE, whereas prophylaxis was found to be protective. However, at the multivariate analysis the statistical significance was lost for both of these variables (HR = 2.76, p = 0.218 and HR = 0.22, p = 0.170, respectively). PPS poorly performed in this population, but no other factors associated with VTE were found. Larger, multicenter studies to develop better RAMs tailored to HM patients are needed to improve VTE management in this population.

血液学住院患者静脉血栓栓塞风险:一项回顾性研究
尽管血液系统恶性肿瘤患者具有不可忽视的静脉血栓栓塞事件(VTE)风险,但尚未开发并验证风险评估模型(RAMs)来预测其住院期间的这种风险。此外,用于预测住院患者血栓栓塞和出血风险的RAMs的性能从未在这一特定人群中进行过评估。在这项观察性研究中,我们试图评估静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)和出血事件(HE)的发生率,评估药理学预防使用,并在514例首次入院的血液病患者中测试TE和HE的现有RAMs(分别为帕多瓦预测评分,PPS和改善出血评分,IBS)。根据PPS和IBS, 165例患者有高血栓栓塞风险,114例有高出血风险;共有148名患者接受了低分子肝素(LMWH)的药物预防。​在单变量分析中,急性白血病的诊断与静脉血栓栓塞的风险增加显著相关,而预防被发现具有保护作用。然而,在多变量分析中,这两个变量都失去了统计学意义(HR = 2.76, p = 0.218和HR = 0.22, p = 0.170)。PPS在该人群中表现不佳,但未发现其他与静脉血栓栓塞相关的因素。需要更大的、多中心的研究来开发针对HM患者的更好的ram,以改善该人群的静脉血栓栓塞管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Hematology
Annals of Hematology 医学-血液学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
304
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Hematology covers the whole spectrum of clinical and experimental hematology, hemostaseology, blood transfusion, and related aspects of medical oncology, including diagnosis and treatment of leukemias, lymphatic neoplasias and solid tumors, and transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells. Coverage includes general aspects of oncology, molecular biology and immunology as pertinent to problems of human blood disease. The journal is associated with the German Society for Hematology and Medical Oncology, and the Austrian Society for Hematology and Oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信