Clinical phenotypes of Alzheimer's disease: investigating atrophy patterns and their pathological correlates.

IF 7.9 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Niels Reijner, I Frigerio, M M A Bouwman, B D C Boon, N Guizard, T Jubault, J J M Hoozemans, A J M Rozemuller, F H Bouwman, F Barkhof, E Gordon, W D J van de Berg, L E Jonkman
{"title":"Clinical phenotypes of Alzheimer's disease: investigating atrophy patterns and their pathological correlates.","authors":"Niels Reijner, I Frigerio, M M A Bouwman, B D C Boon, N Guizard, T Jubault, J J M Hoozemans, A J M Rozemuller, F H Bouwman, F Barkhof, E Gordon, W D J van de Berg, L E Jonkman","doi":"10.1186/s13195-025-01727-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Alzheimer's disease (AD), MRI atrophy patterns can distinguish between amnestic (typical) and non-amnestic (atypical) clinical phenotypes and are increasingly used for diagnosis and outcome measures in clinical trials. However, understanding how protein accumulation and other key features of neurodegeneration influence these imaging measurements, are lacking. The current study aimed to assess regional MRI patterns of cortical atrophy across clinical AD phenotypes, and their association with amyloid-beta (Aβ), phosphorylated tau (pTau), neuro-axonal degeneration and microvascular deterioration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Post-mortem in-situ 3DT1 3 T-MRI data was obtained from 33 AD (17 typical, 16 atypical) and 16 control brain donors. Additionally, ante-mortem 3DT1 3 T-MRI scans of brain donors were collected if available. Regional volumes were obtained from MRI scans using an atlas based parcellation software. Eight cortical brain regions were selected from formalin-fixed right hemispheres of brain donors and then immunostained for Aβ, pTau, neurofilament light, and collagen IV. Group comparisons and volume-pathology associations were analyzed using linear mixed models corrected for age, sex, post-mortem delay, and intracranial volume.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to controls, both typical and atypical AD showed volume loss in the temporo-occipital cortex, while typical AD showed additional volume loss in the parietal cortex. Posterior cingulate volume was lower in typical AD compared to atypical AD (- 6.9%, p = 0.043). In AD, a global positive association between MRI cortical volume and Aβ load (βs = 0.21, p = 0.010), and a global negative association with NfL load (βs = - 0.18, p = 0.018) were observed. Regionally, higher superior parietal gyrus volume was associated with higher Aβ load in typical AD (βs = 0.47, p = 0.004), lower middle frontal gyrus volume associated with higher NfL load in atypical AD (βs = - 0.50, p < 0.001), and lower hippocampal volume associated with higher COLIV load in typical AD (βs = - 1.69, p < 0.001). Comparing post-mortem with ante-mortem scans showed minimal volume differences at scan-intervals within 2 years, highlighting the translational aspect of this study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For both clinical phenotypes, cortical volume is affected by Aβ and neuro-axonal damage, but in opposing directions. Differences in volume-pathology relationships between clinical phenotypes are region-specific. The findings of this study could improve the interpretation of MRI datasets in heterogenous AD cohorts, both in research and clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":7516,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy","volume":"17 1","pages":"93"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12032798/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-025-01727-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In Alzheimer's disease (AD), MRI atrophy patterns can distinguish between amnestic (typical) and non-amnestic (atypical) clinical phenotypes and are increasingly used for diagnosis and outcome measures in clinical trials. However, understanding how protein accumulation and other key features of neurodegeneration influence these imaging measurements, are lacking. The current study aimed to assess regional MRI patterns of cortical atrophy across clinical AD phenotypes, and their association with amyloid-beta (Aβ), phosphorylated tau (pTau), neuro-axonal degeneration and microvascular deterioration.

Methods: Post-mortem in-situ 3DT1 3 T-MRI data was obtained from 33 AD (17 typical, 16 atypical) and 16 control brain donors. Additionally, ante-mortem 3DT1 3 T-MRI scans of brain donors were collected if available. Regional volumes were obtained from MRI scans using an atlas based parcellation software. Eight cortical brain regions were selected from formalin-fixed right hemispheres of brain donors and then immunostained for Aβ, pTau, neurofilament light, and collagen IV. Group comparisons and volume-pathology associations were analyzed using linear mixed models corrected for age, sex, post-mortem delay, and intracranial volume.

Results: Compared to controls, both typical and atypical AD showed volume loss in the temporo-occipital cortex, while typical AD showed additional volume loss in the parietal cortex. Posterior cingulate volume was lower in typical AD compared to atypical AD (- 6.9%, p = 0.043). In AD, a global positive association between MRI cortical volume and Aβ load (βs = 0.21, p = 0.010), and a global negative association with NfL load (βs = - 0.18, p = 0.018) were observed. Regionally, higher superior parietal gyrus volume was associated with higher Aβ load in typical AD (βs = 0.47, p = 0.004), lower middle frontal gyrus volume associated with higher NfL load in atypical AD (βs = - 0.50, p < 0.001), and lower hippocampal volume associated with higher COLIV load in typical AD (βs = - 1.69, p < 0.001). Comparing post-mortem with ante-mortem scans showed minimal volume differences at scan-intervals within 2 years, highlighting the translational aspect of this study.

Conclusion: For both clinical phenotypes, cortical volume is affected by Aβ and neuro-axonal damage, but in opposing directions. Differences in volume-pathology relationships between clinical phenotypes are region-specific. The findings of this study could improve the interpretation of MRI datasets in heterogenous AD cohorts, both in research and clinical settings.

阿尔茨海默病的临床表型:研究萎缩模式及其病理相关性。
背景:在阿尔茨海默病(AD)中,MRI萎缩模式可以区分健忘症(典型)和非健忘症(非典型)临床表型,并越来越多地用于临床试验的诊断和结果测量。然而,了解蛋白质积累和神经变性的其他关键特征如何影响这些成像测量,是缺乏的。目前的研究旨在评估不同临床AD表型的皮层萎缩的区域MRI模式,以及它们与淀粉样蛋白β (Aβ)、磷酸化tau (pTau)、神经轴突变性和微血管恶化的关系。方法:33例AD患者(17例典型,16例不典型)和16例对照脑供者的死后原位3DT1 - 3 T-MRI数据。此外,如果可能的话,还收集了脑供者的死前3DT1 - 3 T-MRI扫描。使用基于地图集的包裹软件从MRI扫描中获得区域体积。从福尔马林固定的脑供体右半球中选择8个皮质脑区,然后对Aβ、pTau、神经丝光和胶原蛋白IV进行免疫染色。使用校正了年龄、性别、死后延迟和颅内容积的线性混合模型,分析各组比较和体积-病理相关性。结果:与对照组相比,典型和非典型AD均表现出颞枕皮质体积损失,而典型AD在顶叶皮质中表现出额外的体积损失。典型AD患者的后扣带体积低于非典型AD患者(- 6.9%,p = 0.043)。在AD中,MRI皮质体积与α β负荷呈整体正相关(βs = 0.21, p = 0.010),与NfL负荷呈整体负相关(βs = - 0.18, p = 0.018)。从区域上看,典型阿尔茨海默病患者较高的顶叶上回体积与较高的Aβ负荷相关(βs = 0.47, p = 0.004),非典型阿尔茨海默病患者较高的NfL负荷与额叶中回下部体积相关(βs = - 0.50, p < 0.001),典型阿尔茨海默病患者较低的海马体积与较高的COLIV负荷相关(βs = - 1.69, p < 0.001)。比较死后和死前的扫描显示,两年内扫描间隔的体积差异很小,突出了本研究的翻译方面。结论:对于两种临床表型,皮质体积均受到Aβ和神经轴突损伤的影响,但方向相反。临床表型之间的体积-病理关系差异是区域特异性的。本研究的结果可以在研究和临床环境中改善对异质性AD队列MRI数据集的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy 医学-神经病学
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
172
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Alzheimer's Research & Therapy is an international peer-reviewed journal that focuses on translational research into Alzheimer's disease and other neurodegenerative diseases. It publishes open-access basic research, clinical trials, drug discovery and development studies, and epidemiologic studies. The journal also includes reviews, viewpoints, commentaries, debates, and reports. All articles published in Alzheimer's Research & Therapy are included in several reputable databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, MEDLINE, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded (Web of Science) and Scopus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信