Randomized Clinical Feasibility Trial: Comparing a Restrictive and Protective Range-of-Motion Brace for the Nonsurgical Management of the Medial Collateral Ligament of the Knee.
Dana J Hunter, Katie MacGregor, Ryan Shields, Amanda M Black, Alexander Rezansoff, Nicholas G Mohtadi
{"title":"Randomized Clinical Feasibility Trial: Comparing a Restrictive and Protective Range-of-Motion Brace for the Nonsurgical Management of the Medial Collateral Ligament of the Knee.","authors":"Dana J Hunter, Katie MacGregor, Ryan Shields, Amanda M Black, Alexander Rezansoff, Nicholas G Mohtadi","doi":"10.1097/JSM.0000000000001361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>(1) Assess medial collateral ligament (MCL) laxity differences in nonoperatively treated acute MCL and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-MCL injuries with 2 range of motion (ROM) knee brace settings. (2) Describe knee ROM, brace satisfaction, overall knee score, adherence, pain, quality of life, and knee function. (3) Assess feasibility of larger trial.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective, randomized, single-blinded feasibility clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Sixty-four adults with acute moderate-to-severe isolated MCL or combined ACL-MCL injuries at the University of Calgary Sport Medicine Centre.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Random assignment to the protected (0-90 degrees) or restricted (30-90 degrees) brace group. Four weeks of constant brace wearing, followed by daytime wear until 6 weeks. Rehabilitation exercises prescribed from 2 weeks onward. Follow-up for 12 weeks.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Clinical outcomes included side-to-side difference (SSD) MCL laxity (mm) at 30 degrees knee flexion and 0 degree, ROM, patient-reported pain, overall knee ratings, brace satisfaction, daily adherence, international knee documentation committee subjective, and ACL-quality of life (QOL) collected throughout 12 weeks (baseline, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 weeks). The outcome assessor was masked to treatment group allocation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 12 weeks, 73% had <1 mm SSD valgus laxity at 30 degrees knee flexion, with 82% in the restricted group and 67% in the protected group. All patients reported improved pain; none suffered a loss of knee ROM by 12 weeks. The 30 to 90 degrees brace group trended toward better adherence, satisfaction, function, overall knee scores, and QOL. A larger RCT would be feasible but challenging because of sample size needs and slow recruitment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Favorable outcomes for bracing moderate-to-severe MCL injuries at 30 to 90 degrees for 6 weeks were observed in this feasibility trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":10355,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JSM.0000000000001361","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: (1) Assess medial collateral ligament (MCL) laxity differences in nonoperatively treated acute MCL and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-MCL injuries with 2 range of motion (ROM) knee brace settings. (2) Describe knee ROM, brace satisfaction, overall knee score, adherence, pain, quality of life, and knee function. (3) Assess feasibility of larger trial.
Participants: Sixty-four adults with acute moderate-to-severe isolated MCL or combined ACL-MCL injuries at the University of Calgary Sport Medicine Centre.
Intervention: Random assignment to the protected (0-90 degrees) or restricted (30-90 degrees) brace group. Four weeks of constant brace wearing, followed by daytime wear until 6 weeks. Rehabilitation exercises prescribed from 2 weeks onward. Follow-up for 12 weeks.
Main outcome measures: Clinical outcomes included side-to-side difference (SSD) MCL laxity (mm) at 30 degrees knee flexion and 0 degree, ROM, patient-reported pain, overall knee ratings, brace satisfaction, daily adherence, international knee documentation committee subjective, and ACL-quality of life (QOL) collected throughout 12 weeks (baseline, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 weeks). The outcome assessor was masked to treatment group allocation.
Results: At 12 weeks, 73% had <1 mm SSD valgus laxity at 30 degrees knee flexion, with 82% in the restricted group and 67% in the protected group. All patients reported improved pain; none suffered a loss of knee ROM by 12 weeks. The 30 to 90 degrees brace group trended toward better adherence, satisfaction, function, overall knee scores, and QOL. A larger RCT would be feasible but challenging because of sample size needs and slow recruitment.
Conclusions: Favorable outcomes for bracing moderate-to-severe MCL injuries at 30 to 90 degrees for 6 weeks were observed in this feasibility trial.
期刊介绍：
Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine is an international refereed journal published for clinicians with a primary interest in sports medicine practice. The journal publishes original research and reviews covering diagnostics, therapeutics, and rehabilitation in healthy and physically challenged individuals of all ages and levels of sport and exercise participation.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
