Enhanced associations between subjective cognitive concerns and blood-based AD biomarkers using a novel EMA approach.

IF 7.9 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ángel García de la Garza, Caroline Nester, Cuiling Wang, Jacqueline Mogle, Nelson Roque, Mindy Katz, Carol A Derby, Richard B Lipton, Laura Rabin
{"title":"Enhanced associations between subjective cognitive concerns and blood-based AD biomarkers using a novel EMA approach.","authors":"Ángel García de la Garza, Caroline Nester, Cuiling Wang, Jacqueline Mogle, Nelson Roque, Mindy Katz, Carol A Derby, Richard B Lipton, Laura Rabin","doi":"10.1186/s13195-025-01720-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Subjective cognitive concerns (SCC) have emerged as important early indicators of Alzheimer's disease (AD) risk. Traditional measures of SCC rely on recall-based assessments, which may be limited in capturing real-time fluctuations in cognitive concerns. Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) offers a promising alternative by providing real-time data. This study aimed to link SCC assessed via EMA and traditional measures with blood-based AD biomarkers in a diverse, dementia-free, community-based sample based in the Bronx, NY.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Einstein Aging Study (EAS) participants underwent in-person, recall-based assessments of SCC during an in-clinic visit. Additionally, EMA SCC assessments were collected once per day over two weeks. Linear regressions were conducted to examine the relationships between SCC variables and plasma biomarkers adjusted for demographics and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In N = 254 participants, EMA-reported SCCs demonstrated significant associations with AD biomarkers, particularly p-tau181 (β = 0.21, p = 0.001). Further, significant associations remain across both cognitive (cognitively unimpaired vs. MCI) and racial groups. In contrast, traditional SCC measures exhibited limited associations with these biomarkers. The findings highlight the added value of EMA in capturing SCCs that could indicate early ADRD risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EMA provides a more dynamic and potentially sensitive method for detecting early AD risk compared to traditional SCC assessments. These real-time measures could enhance early detection and clinical intervention, particularly in diverse and under-resourced populations. This study underscores the potential of EMA for broad applicability and inclusivity in monitoring AD progression and facilitating early therapeutic interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":7516,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy","volume":"17 1","pages":"82"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11998261/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-025-01720-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Subjective cognitive concerns (SCC) have emerged as important early indicators of Alzheimer's disease (AD) risk. Traditional measures of SCC rely on recall-based assessments, which may be limited in capturing real-time fluctuations in cognitive concerns. Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) offers a promising alternative by providing real-time data. This study aimed to link SCC assessed via EMA and traditional measures with blood-based AD biomarkers in a diverse, dementia-free, community-based sample based in the Bronx, NY.

Methods: Einstein Aging Study (EAS) participants underwent in-person, recall-based assessments of SCC during an in-clinic visit. Additionally, EMA SCC assessments were collected once per day over two weeks. Linear regressions were conducted to examine the relationships between SCC variables and plasma biomarkers adjusted for demographics and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) status.

Results: In N = 254 participants, EMA-reported SCCs demonstrated significant associations with AD biomarkers, particularly p-tau181 (β = 0.21, p = 0.001). Further, significant associations remain across both cognitive (cognitively unimpaired vs. MCI) and racial groups. In contrast, traditional SCC measures exhibited limited associations with these biomarkers. The findings highlight the added value of EMA in capturing SCCs that could indicate early ADRD risk.

Conclusions: EMA provides a more dynamic and potentially sensitive method for detecting early AD risk compared to traditional SCC assessments. These real-time measures could enhance early detection and clinical intervention, particularly in diverse and under-resourced populations. This study underscores the potential of EMA for broad applicability and inclusivity in monitoring AD progression and facilitating early therapeutic interventions.

使用一种新的EMA方法,增强了主观认知问题与血液AD生物标志物之间的关联。
背景:主观认知担忧(SCC)已成为阿尔茨海默病(AD)风险的重要早期指标。SCC的传统测量方法依赖于基于回忆的评估,这在捕捉认知关注点的实时波动方面可能受到限制。生态瞬时评估(EMA)通过提供实时数据提供了一个有前途的替代方案。该研究旨在将纽约州布朗克斯一个多样化、无痴呆、基于社区的样本中通过EMA和传统方法评估的SCC与基于血液的AD生物标志物联系起来。方法:爱因斯坦衰老研究(EAS)的参与者在门诊访问期间接受了基于回忆的SCC亲自评估。此外,在两周内每天收集一次EMA SCC评估。采用线性回归来检验SCC变量与经人口统计学调整的血浆生物标志物和轻度认知障碍(MCI)状态之间的关系。结果:在N = 254名参与者中,ema报告的SCCs与AD生物标志物,特别是p-tau181有显著相关性(β = 0.21, p = 0.001)。此外,在认知(认知未受损与轻度认知障碍)和种族群体中仍存在显著关联。相比之下,传统的SCC测量与这些生物标志物的关联有限。研究结果强调了EMA在捕获SCCs方面的附加价值,SCCs可能表明早期ADRD风险。结论:与传统的SCC评估相比,EMA提供了一种更动态、更敏感的早期AD风险检测方法。这些实时措施可以加强早期发现和临床干预,特别是在不同和资源不足的人群中。这项研究强调了EMA在监测AD进展和促进早期治疗干预方面具有广泛适用性和包容性的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy 医学-神经病学
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
172
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Alzheimer's Research & Therapy is an international peer-reviewed journal that focuses on translational research into Alzheimer's disease and other neurodegenerative diseases. It publishes open-access basic research, clinical trials, drug discovery and development studies, and epidemiologic studies. The journal also includes reviews, viewpoints, commentaries, debates, and reports. All articles published in Alzheimer's Research & Therapy are included in several reputable databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, MEDLINE, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded (Web of Science) and Scopus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信