Non-technical error leading to patient fatalities in the Australian surgical population.

IF 8.6 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Jesse D Ey, Victoria Kollias, Octavia Lee, Kelly Hou, Matheesha B Herath, John B North, Ellie C Treloar, Martin H Bruening, Adam J Wells, Guy J Maddern
{"title":"Non-technical error leading to patient fatalities in the Australian surgical population.","authors":"Jesse D Ey, Victoria Kollias, Octavia Lee, Kelly Hou, Matheesha B Herath, John B North, Ellie C Treloar, Martin H Bruening, Adam J Wells, Guy J Maddern","doi":"10.1093/bjs/znaf083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Many surgical adverse events are due to errors in non-technical skills (NTS); consequently, improving NTS is a priority. However, evidence to guide NTS improvement activities is lacking. This study aimed to investigate the incidence and characteristics of non-technical errors linked to fatalities in a large, representative surgical-patient population to guide future NTS improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All fatality cases with known or suspected adverse events reported to the Australian and New Zealand Audit of Surgical Mortality (ANZASM) between 2012 and 2019 were retrospectively assessed using a validated tool developed by the study authors. Outcomes included the incidence of non-technical errors linked to death (overall and by NTS domain), the identification of non-technical error predictors through multivariate analysis, and change in non-technical error incidence over time using statistical process control charts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Some 30 971 cases of surgical fatality were reported between 2012 and 2019, of which 3829 met the inclusion criteria. Due to insufficient information, 134 were excluded, leaving 3695 for analysis. Non-technical errors associated with patient death were identified in 63.7%. Of these, 58.4% had Decision-Making errors, 56.4% had Situational Awareness errors, 15.2% had Communication/Teamwork errors, and 5.44% had Leadership errors. Statistically significant predictors of Communication/Teamwork, Decision-Making, and Situational Awareness errors were identified. The incidence of overall non-technical errors decreased significantly between 2012 and 2019 and periods of significant decrease in Communication/Teamwork and Leadership errors were demonstrated. No significant decrease in Decision-Making or Situational Awareness errors were demonstrated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The incidence of non-technical errors associated with surgical mortality rate is high. Future NTS improvement efforts should be targeted towards Decision-Making and Situational Awareness errors.</p>","PeriodicalId":136,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Surgery","volume":"112 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaf083","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Many surgical adverse events are due to errors in non-technical skills (NTS); consequently, improving NTS is a priority. However, evidence to guide NTS improvement activities is lacking. This study aimed to investigate the incidence and characteristics of non-technical errors linked to fatalities in a large, representative surgical-patient population to guide future NTS improvement.

Methods: All fatality cases with known or suspected adverse events reported to the Australian and New Zealand Audit of Surgical Mortality (ANZASM) between 2012 and 2019 were retrospectively assessed using a validated tool developed by the study authors. Outcomes included the incidence of non-technical errors linked to death (overall and by NTS domain), the identification of non-technical error predictors through multivariate analysis, and change in non-technical error incidence over time using statistical process control charts.

Results: Some 30 971 cases of surgical fatality were reported between 2012 and 2019, of which 3829 met the inclusion criteria. Due to insufficient information, 134 were excluded, leaving 3695 for analysis. Non-technical errors associated with patient death were identified in 63.7%. Of these, 58.4% had Decision-Making errors, 56.4% had Situational Awareness errors, 15.2% had Communication/Teamwork errors, and 5.44% had Leadership errors. Statistically significant predictors of Communication/Teamwork, Decision-Making, and Situational Awareness errors were identified. The incidence of overall non-technical errors decreased significantly between 2012 and 2019 and periods of significant decrease in Communication/Teamwork and Leadership errors were demonstrated. No significant decrease in Decision-Making or Situational Awareness errors were demonstrated.

Conclusion: The incidence of non-technical errors associated with surgical mortality rate is high. Future NTS improvement efforts should be targeted towards Decision-Making and Situational Awareness errors.

非技术错误导致澳大利亚外科患者死亡。
导言:许多手术不良事件是由于非技术技能(NTS)错误;因此,改善国家税务系统是当务之急。然而,缺乏指导NTS改进活动的证据。本研究旨在调查大量具有代表性的手术患者中与死亡相关的非技术错误的发生率和特征,以指导未来NTS的改进。方法:使用研究作者开发的经过验证的工具,回顾性评估2012年至2019年期间向澳大利亚和新西兰手术死亡率审计(ANZASM)报告的所有已知或疑似不良事件的死亡病例。结果包括与死亡相关的非技术错误发生率(总体和NTS域),通过多变量分析确定非技术错误预测因子,以及使用统计过程控制图的非技术错误发生率随时间的变化。结果:2012 - 2019年共报告手术死亡病例30 971例,其中3829例符合纳入标准。由于资料不足,排除了134份,剩下3695份进行分析。与患者死亡相关的非技术差错占63.7%。其中58.4%为决策错误,56.4%为态势感知错误,15.2%为沟通/团队合作错误,5.44%为领导错误。统计显著预测沟通/团队合作,决策,和态势感知错误被确定。从2012年到2019年,总体非技术错误的发生率显著下降,沟通/团队合作和领导错误的发生率显著下降。决策错误和情境意识错误没有显著减少。结论:非技术差错发生率高,与手术死亡率相关。未来的NTS改进工作应该针对决策和态势感知错误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1102
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Surgery (BJS), incorporating the European Journal of Surgery, stands as Europe's leading peer-reviewed surgical journal. It serves as an invaluable platform for presenting high-quality clinical and laboratory-based research across a wide range of surgical topics. In addition to providing a comprehensive coverage of traditional surgical practices, BJS also showcases emerging areas in the field, such as minimally invasive therapy and interventional radiology. While the journal appeals to general surgeons, it also holds relevance for specialty surgeons and professionals working in closely related fields. By presenting cutting-edge research and advancements, BJS aims to revolutionize the way surgical knowledge is shared and contribute to the ongoing progress of the surgical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信