In-hospital outcomes of percutaneous ablative therapy for colorectal cancer liver metastasis in patients with and without frailty: nationwide inpatient sample analysis 2005-2020.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
American journal of cancer research Pub Date : 2025-03-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.62347/MQXG6358
Yen-Jung Lu, Chien-Hsin Chen, En-Kwang Lin
{"title":"In-hospital outcomes of percutaneous ablative therapy for colorectal cancer liver metastasis in patients with and without frailty: nationwide inpatient sample analysis 2005-2020.","authors":"Yen-Jung Lu, Chien-Hsin Chen, En-Kwang Lin","doi":"10.62347/MQXG6358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Percutaneous ablative therapies are widely used to treat colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), particularly in patients who are not candidates for surgical resection. Frailty has been associated with poor outcomes in colorectal cancer (CRC) and liver resections. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical impact of frailty on short-term outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous ablative therapies for CRLM. This population-based, retrospective study used data from the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample database (2005-2020). Adults aged ≥ 50 years diagnosed with CRLM who underwent percutaneous ablative therapies were included. Frailty was confirmed using the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS). Associations between frailty and in-hospital mortality, length of hospital stay (LOS), non-home discharge, total hospital charges, and postoperative complications were evaluated using univariate and multivariable regression analyses. A total of 670 patients (mean age: 66.3 years) were included, of whom 23% were categorized as frail (HFRS ≥ 5). Multivariable analysis showed that frail patients had significantly increased risks of complications (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 4.80, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.04-7.59), longer LOS (adjusted Beta [aBeta] = 1.69 days, 95% CI: 1.68-1.70), and higher total hospital charges (aBeta = $22.04 thousand, 95% CI: $21.92-$22.16). Complications with the highest risks in frail patients included, sepsis/shock (aOR = 17.39), surgical site infection (aOR = 3.55), respiratory failure/mechanical ventilation (aOR = 4.43), acute kidney injury (aOR = 9.37), and bleeding (aOR = 4.79). In conclusion, in adults aged ≥ 50 years undergoing percutaneous ablative therapies for CRLM, frailty independently predicted worse short-term outcomes, including higher complication rates, longer LOS, and increased hospital charges. The absence of detailed tumor characteristics and specific types of ablative therapy performed underscores the need for further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":7437,"journal":{"name":"American journal of cancer research","volume":"15 3","pages":"1280-1290"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11982708/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of cancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/MQXG6358","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Percutaneous ablative therapies are widely used to treat colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), particularly in patients who are not candidates for surgical resection. Frailty has been associated with poor outcomes in colorectal cancer (CRC) and liver resections. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical impact of frailty on short-term outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous ablative therapies for CRLM. This population-based, retrospective study used data from the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample database (2005-2020). Adults aged ≥ 50 years diagnosed with CRLM who underwent percutaneous ablative therapies were included. Frailty was confirmed using the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS). Associations between frailty and in-hospital mortality, length of hospital stay (LOS), non-home discharge, total hospital charges, and postoperative complications were evaluated using univariate and multivariable regression analyses. A total of 670 patients (mean age: 66.3 years) were included, of whom 23% were categorized as frail (HFRS ≥ 5). Multivariable analysis showed that frail patients had significantly increased risks of complications (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 4.80, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.04-7.59), longer LOS (adjusted Beta [aBeta] = 1.69 days, 95% CI: 1.68-1.70), and higher total hospital charges (aBeta = $22.04 thousand, 95% CI: $21.92-$22.16). Complications with the highest risks in frail patients included, sepsis/shock (aOR = 17.39), surgical site infection (aOR = 3.55), respiratory failure/mechanical ventilation (aOR = 4.43), acute kidney injury (aOR = 9.37), and bleeding (aOR = 4.79). In conclusion, in adults aged ≥ 50 years undergoing percutaneous ablative therapies for CRLM, frailty independently predicted worse short-term outcomes, including higher complication rates, longer LOS, and increased hospital charges. The absence of detailed tumor characteristics and specific types of ablative therapy performed underscores the need for further research.

经皮消融治疗伴有和不伴有虚弱的结直肠癌肝转移患者的住院结果:2005-2020年全国住院患者样本分析
经皮消融治疗被广泛用于治疗结直肠肝转移(CRLM),特别是那些不适合手术切除的患者。在结直肠癌(CRC)和肝脏切除术中,虚弱与预后不良有关。本研究旨在评估衰弱对接受经皮消融治疗的CRLM患者短期预后的临床影响。这项基于人群的回顾性研究使用了美国全国住院患者样本数据库(2005-2020)的数据。年龄≥50岁诊断为CRLM并接受经皮消融治疗的成年人被纳入研究对象。使用医院虚弱风险评分(HFRS)确认虚弱。使用单变量和多变量回归分析评估虚弱与住院死亡率、住院时间(LOS)、非家庭出院、医院总收费和术后并发症之间的关系。共纳入670例患者(平均年龄:66.3岁),其中23%为体弱(HFRS≥5)。多变量分析显示,体弱患者并发症风险明显增加(调整优势比[aOR] = 4.80, 95%可信区间[CI]: 3.04-7.59), LOS(调整β [aBeta] = 1.69天,95% CI: 1.68-1.70),总住院费用较高(aBeta = 220.4万美元,95% CI: 21.92- 22.16美元)。体弱患者的高危并发症包括败血症/休克(aOR = 17.39)、手术部位感染(aOR = 3.55)、呼吸衰竭/机械通气(aOR = 4.43)、急性肾损伤(aOR = 9.37)和出血(aOR = 4.79)。总之,在年龄≥50岁接受经皮消融治疗的CRLM患者中,虚弱独立预示着更差的短期预后,包括更高的并发症发生率、更长的LOS和更高的住院费用。缺乏详细的肿瘤特征和特定类型的消融治疗强调了进一步研究的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
3.80%
发文量
263
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Cancer Research (AJCR) (ISSN 2156-6976), is an independent open access, online only journal to facilitate rapid dissemination of novel discoveries in basic science and treatment of cancer. It was founded by a group of scientists for cancer research and clinical academic oncologists from around the world, who are devoted to the promotion and advancement of our understanding of the cancer and its treatment. The scope of AJCR is intended to encompass that of multi-disciplinary researchers from any scientific discipline where the primary focus of the research is to increase and integrate knowledge about etiology and molecular mechanisms of carcinogenesis with the ultimate aim of advancing the cure and prevention of this increasingly devastating disease. To achieve these aims AJCR will publish review articles, original articles and new techniques in cancer research and therapy. It will also publish hypothesis, case reports and letter to the editor. Unlike most other open access online journals, AJCR will keep most of the traditional features of paper print that we are all familiar with, such as continuous volume, issue numbers, as well as continuous page numbers to retain our comfortable familiarity towards an academic journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信