Pooling data for primary total knee implants across national registries: is the same implant used in multiple registries and for the same patient group? An observational study.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Lotje Hoogervorst, Rob G H H Nelissen, Liza Van Steenbergen, Alma B Pedersen, Eskild Bendix Kristiansen, Martin Lindberg-Larsen, Marina Torre, Enrico Ciminello, Riccardo Valentini, Alexander W Grimberg, Yinan Wu, Perla J Marang-van de Mheen
{"title":"Pooling data for primary total knee implants across national registries: is the same implant used in multiple registries and for the same patient group? An observational study.","authors":"Lotje Hoogervorst, Rob G H H Nelissen, Liza Van Steenbergen, Alma B Pedersen, Eskild Bendix Kristiansen, Martin Lindberg-Larsen, Marina Torre, Enrico Ciminello, Riccardo Valentini, Alexander W Grimberg, Yinan Wu, Perla J Marang-van de Mheen","doi":"10.2340/17453674.2025.43476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong> Pooling data on the performance of total knee (TK) implants across registries is only possible if the same TK implant is used across multiple registries and if used in patients with similar characteristics. We assessed to what extent specific TK implants: (i) are used across multiple registries or only in a single registry; and (ii) differ in patient characteristics between registries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> All primary TK implants implanted between January 2020 and December 2021 in the Danish, Dutch, German, and Italian registries were included. We determined the number of registries using a specific TK implant (based on combined femoral-tibial component brand name and fixation/congruency/mobile bearing insert/patella usage). Patient characteristics (age/body mass index [BMI]/sex/diagnosis osteoarthritis) were compared across registries for TK implants used in ≥ 2 registries ≥ 100 times.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> 813 different TK implants (577,351 procedures) were used across the 4 registries, of which 53 TK implants (7%) were used in 1 registry (8,000 procedures). 760 different TK implants (569,351 procedures; 99%) were used in ≥ 2 registries of which 47 different TK implants (393,954 procedures; 68%) were used in ≥ 2 registries and ≥ 100 times. Statistically and clinically significant differences in age for the same TK implant across registries were observed for 29 TK implants (62%) and 3 TK implants (6%), respectively; for other characteristics these were for BMI 30 (64%) and 0 (0%) TK implants; for male proportion 23 (49%) and 17 (36%) TK implants; and for diagnosis of osteoarthritis 42 (89%) and 34 (72%) TK implants, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Most specific TK implants and TK procedures were used across multiple registries, but they were often used in patients with different characteristics. This has an impact on comparing implant performances between registries.</p>","PeriodicalId":6916,"journal":{"name":"Acta Orthopaedica","volume":"96 ","pages":"339-347"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12006037/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Orthopaedica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2025.43476","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose:  Pooling data on the performance of total knee (TK) implants across registries is only possible if the same TK implant is used across multiple registries and if used in patients with similar characteristics. We assessed to what extent specific TK implants: (i) are used across multiple registries or only in a single registry; and (ii) differ in patient characteristics between registries.

Methods:  All primary TK implants implanted between January 2020 and December 2021 in the Danish, Dutch, German, and Italian registries were included. We determined the number of registries using a specific TK implant (based on combined femoral-tibial component brand name and fixation/congruency/mobile bearing insert/patella usage). Patient characteristics (age/body mass index [BMI]/sex/diagnosis osteoarthritis) were compared across registries for TK implants used in ≥ 2 registries ≥ 100 times.

Results:  813 different TK implants (577,351 procedures) were used across the 4 registries, of which 53 TK implants (7%) were used in 1 registry (8,000 procedures). 760 different TK implants (569,351 procedures; 99%) were used in ≥ 2 registries of which 47 different TK implants (393,954 procedures; 68%) were used in ≥ 2 registries and ≥ 100 times. Statistically and clinically significant differences in age for the same TK implant across registries were observed for 29 TK implants (62%) and 3 TK implants (6%), respectively; for other characteristics these were for BMI 30 (64%) and 0 (0%) TK implants; for male proportion 23 (49%) and 17 (36%) TK implants; and for diagnosis of osteoarthritis 42 (89%) and 34 (72%) TK implants, respectively.

Conclusion:  Most specific TK implants and TK procedures were used across multiple registries, but they were often used in patients with different characteristics. This has an impact on comparing implant performances between registries.

汇总全国初次全膝关节植入物的数据:同一植入物是否在多个注册中心和同一患者组中使用?一项观察性研究。
背景和目的:只有在多个注册中心使用相同的全膝关节(TK)植入物,并在具有相似特征的患者中使用时,才有可能汇集全膝关节(TK)植入物的性能数据。我们评估了特定TK植入物的程度:(i)跨多个注册中心使用或仅在单个注册中心使用;(ii)不同注册中心的患者特征不同。方法:纳入2020年1月至2021年12月期间在丹麦、荷兰、德国和意大利注册中心植入的所有初级TK植入物。我们确定了使用特定TK植入物的注册数量(基于联合股胫组件品牌名称和固定物/一致性/移动轴承插入物/髌骨使用情况)。患者特征(年龄/体重指数[BMI]/性别/诊断骨关节炎)在≥2个注册中心中使用≥100次的TK植入物进行比较。结果:4个注册中心共使用了813种不同的TK植入物(577,351例手术),其中1个注册中心(8,000例手术)使用了53种TK植入物(7%)。760种不同的TK植入物(569,351例);99%),其中47种不同的TK植入物(393,954例;68%)在≥2个注册中心使用,且使用次数≥100次。在不同的注册表中,29例(62%)和3例(6%)的TK植入物在年龄上存在统计学和临床显著差异;对于其他特征,BMI为30(64%)和0(0%)的TK植入物;男性分别为23例(49%)和17例(36%);用于骨关节炎诊断的TK植入物分别为42(89%)和34(72%)。结论:大多数特定的TK植入物和TK手术在多个注册中心使用,但它们通常用于具有不同特征的患者。这对比较注册表之间的植入性能有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Orthopaedica
Acta Orthopaedica 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
105
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Orthopaedica (previously Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica) presents original articles of basic research interest, as well as clinical studies in the field of orthopedics and related sub disciplines. Ever since the journal was founded in 1930, by a group of Scandinavian orthopedic surgeons, the journal has been published for an international audience. Acta Orthopaedica is owned by the Nordic Orthopaedic Federation and is the official publication of this federation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信