Comparative efficacy of levofloxacin, azithromycin, and doxycycline prophylaxis and treatment in an experimental Ureaplasma murine lung infection model.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Pub Date : 2025-05-07 Epub Date: 2025-04-14 DOI:10.1128/aac.01724-24
Derek Fleming, Maha Y Al-Jabri, Robin Patel
{"title":"Comparative efficacy of levofloxacin, azithromycin, and doxycycline prophylaxis and treatment in an experimental <i>Ureaplasma</i> murine lung infection model.","authors":"Derek Fleming, Maha Y Al-Jabri, Robin Patel","doi":"10.1128/aac.01724-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although lung transplant recipients who develop <i>Ureaplasma-</i>associated hyperammonemia syndrome are treated with <i>Ureaplasma</i>-targeted antibiotics, optimal therapy is incompletely defined, and typically not based on real-time antimicrobial susceptibility testing results. This study compared levofloxacin, azithromycin, and doxycycline prevention and treatment of <i>Ureaplasma urealyticum</i> (UU) and <i>Ureaplasma parvum</i> (UP) infections in an immunosuppressed murine lung infection model. For prophylaxis, mice received antibiotics before infection with UP-FS (susceptible to all study antibiotics), UP-AzmR (azithromycin-resistant), UP-LevR (levofloxacin-resistant), or UU-DoxR (doxycycline-resistant), with lung bacterial loads (color changing units [CCUs]) measured 18 hours following infection. For UP-FS, doxycycline was most active (Δ4.84 log<sub>10</sub> CCU/g; <i>P</i> = 0.0006), followed by levofloxacin (Δ2.45 log<sub>10</sub> CCU/g; <i>P</i> = 0.018), with azithromycin yielding a nonsignificant CCU reduction. Doxycycline (Δ1.9 log<sub>10</sub> CCU/g; <i>P</i> = 0.0025) and levofloxacin (Δ1.3 log<sub>10</sub> CCU/g; <i>P</i> = 0.004) showed activity against UP-AzmR. Only doxycycline showed activity against UP-LevR (Δ2.28 log<sub>10</sub> CCU/g; <i>P</i> = 0.0002), and only azithromycin showed activity against UU-DoxR (Δ0.67 log<sub>10</sub> CCU/g; <i>P</i> = 0.0175). For treatment, antibiotics were administered 24 hours following infection; doxycycline significantly reduced bacterial loads of all study isolates, except UU-DoxR. In addition, azithromycin was active against UP-LevR (Δ1.21 log<sub>10</sub> CCU/g reduction; <i>P</i> = 0.0003). In summary, except for doxycycline-resistant UU, doxycycline was active in preventing and treating <i>Ureaplasma</i> lung infection in immunosuppressed mice.</p>","PeriodicalId":8152,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy","volume":"69 5","pages":"e0172424"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12057339/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.01724-24","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although lung transplant recipients who develop Ureaplasma-associated hyperammonemia syndrome are treated with Ureaplasma-targeted antibiotics, optimal therapy is incompletely defined, and typically not based on real-time antimicrobial susceptibility testing results. This study compared levofloxacin, azithromycin, and doxycycline prevention and treatment of Ureaplasma urealyticum (UU) and Ureaplasma parvum (UP) infections in an immunosuppressed murine lung infection model. For prophylaxis, mice received antibiotics before infection with UP-FS (susceptible to all study antibiotics), UP-AzmR (azithromycin-resistant), UP-LevR (levofloxacin-resistant), or UU-DoxR (doxycycline-resistant), with lung bacterial loads (color changing units [CCUs]) measured 18 hours following infection. For UP-FS, doxycycline was most active (Δ4.84 log10 CCU/g; P = 0.0006), followed by levofloxacin (Δ2.45 log10 CCU/g; P = 0.018), with azithromycin yielding a nonsignificant CCU reduction. Doxycycline (Δ1.9 log10 CCU/g; P = 0.0025) and levofloxacin (Δ1.3 log10 CCU/g; P = 0.004) showed activity against UP-AzmR. Only doxycycline showed activity against UP-LevR (Δ2.28 log10 CCU/g; P = 0.0002), and only azithromycin showed activity against UU-DoxR (Δ0.67 log10 CCU/g; P = 0.0175). For treatment, antibiotics were administered 24 hours following infection; doxycycline significantly reduced bacterial loads of all study isolates, except UU-DoxR. In addition, azithromycin was active against UP-LevR (Δ1.21 log10 CCU/g reduction; P = 0.0003). In summary, except for doxycycline-resistant UU, doxycycline was active in preventing and treating Ureaplasma lung infection in immunosuppressed mice.

左氧氟沙星、阿奇霉素和多西环素预防和治疗小鼠实验性脲原体肺部感染的疗效比较。
尽管出现脲原体相关高氨血症综合征的肺移植受者可使用脲原体靶向抗生素治疗,但最佳治疗方法尚未完全确定,而且通常不是基于实时抗菌药敏试验结果。本研究比较了左氧氟沙星、阿奇霉素和多西环素对免疫抑制小鼠肺部感染模型解脲支原体(UU)和细小脲支原体(UP)感染的预防和治疗效果。在预防方面,小鼠在感染UP-FS(对所有研究抗生素敏感)、UP-AzmR(阿奇霉素耐药)、UP-LevR(左氧氟沙星耐药)或UU-DoxR(多西环素耐药)前接受抗生素治疗,并在感染后18小时测量肺部细菌负荷(颜色变化单位[CCUs])。对于UP-FS,强力霉素最具活性(Δ4.84 log10 CCU/g;P = 0.0006),其次是左氧氟沙星(Δ2.45 log10 CCU/g;P = 0.018),阿奇霉素对CCU的降低不显著。强力霉素(Δ1.9 log10 CCU/g;P = 0.0025)和左氧氟沙星(Δ1.3 log10 CCU/g;P = 0.004)对UP-AzmR有活性。只有强力霉素对UP-LevR有活性(Δ2.28 log10 CCU/g;P = 0.0002),只有阿奇霉素对UU-DoxR有抑制作用(Δ0.67 log10 CCU/g;P = 0.0175)。在治疗方面,感染后24小时给予抗生素;强力霉素显著降低了除UU-DoxR外所有研究分离株的细菌负荷。此外,阿奇霉素对UP-LevR有活性(Δ1.21 log10 CCU/g还原;P = 0.0003)。综上所述,除多西环素耐药UU外,多西环素对免疫抑制小鼠脲原体肺部感染均有预防和治疗作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
8.20%
发文量
762
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (AAC) features interdisciplinary studies that build our understanding of the underlying mechanisms and therapeutic applications of antimicrobial and antiparasitic agents and chemotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信