Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy vs. Axillary Lymph Node Dissection for Early-Stage Breast Cancer and Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis With Special Focus on Locoregional Recurrence and Regional Node Irradiation.

IF 1.8 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Breast Cancer : Basic and Clinical Research Pub Date : 2025-05-08 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/11782234251335409
Sanjit Kumar Agrawal, M Mohammed Imran, Shivank Sethi, Sanjay Kumar Yadav, Pawan Agarwal, Dhananjaya Sharma
{"title":"Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy vs. Axillary Lymph Node Dissection for Early-Stage Breast Cancer and Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis With Special Focus on Locoregional Recurrence and Regional Node Irradiation.","authors":"Sanjit Kumar Agrawal, M Mohammed Imran, Shivank Sethi, Sanjay Kumar Yadav, Pawan Agarwal, Dhananjaya Sharma","doi":"10.1177/11782234251335409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The management of early breast cancer patients with metastatic sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) remains a critical decision point in balancing survival outcomes with surgical morbidities. This study addresses whether sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) with or without regional node irradiation (RNI) can offer comparable survival outcomes to axillary lymph node dissection (ALND).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), locoregional recurrence (LRR), and mortality outcomes of SLNB (with or without RNI) compared with ALND in patients with metastasis-positive SLNs.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We have performed an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing SLNB alone or with RNI vs. ALND for early breast cancer patients with metastatic SLNs.</p><p><strong>Data sources and methods: </strong>Eligibility criteria included RCTs comparing SLNB ± RNI vs ALND for metastasis-positive SLN. PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane library, and online registers were searched for articles comparing SLNB alone vs. ALND for metastasis-positive SLN. Articles were evaluated for risk of bias using Cochrane's revised tool (RoB). The main summary measures using the random effects model were hazard ratio and risk ratio.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. Overall survival and DFS were superior in the SLNB group compared to the ALND group. Locoregional recurrence and mortality were comparable between both the groups. After stratifying RCTs with regards to adjuvant RNI, these parameters were still comparable to ALND.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis suggests that SLNB, with or without RNI, offers comparable OS and DFS to ALND for early breast cancer patients with metastasis-positive SLNs. However, the inclusion of studies that did not differentiate between micrometastases and macrometastases may introduce bias, particularly when assessing the impact of RNI. The role of RNI remains debated specially in those with macrometastases, and future research should focus on stratified analyses to clarify this. While SLNB represents a viable alternative to ALND, further trials are needed to define the optimal role in subgroups with high-risk tumor biology.</p>","PeriodicalId":9163,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer : Basic and Clinical Research","volume":"19 ","pages":"11782234251335409"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12062596/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer : Basic and Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11782234251335409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The management of early breast cancer patients with metastatic sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) remains a critical decision point in balancing survival outcomes with surgical morbidities. This study addresses whether sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) with or without regional node irradiation (RNI) can offer comparable survival outcomes to axillary lymph node dissection (ALND).

Objectives: To evaluate overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), locoregional recurrence (LRR), and mortality outcomes of SLNB (with or without RNI) compared with ALND in patients with metastasis-positive SLNs.

Design: We have performed an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing SLNB alone or with RNI vs. ALND for early breast cancer patients with metastatic SLNs.

Data sources and methods: Eligibility criteria included RCTs comparing SLNB ± RNI vs ALND for metastasis-positive SLN. PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane library, and online registers were searched for articles comparing SLNB alone vs. ALND for metastasis-positive SLN. Articles were evaluated for risk of bias using Cochrane's revised tool (RoB). The main summary measures using the random effects model were hazard ratio and risk ratio.

Results: Seven RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. Overall survival and DFS were superior in the SLNB group compared to the ALND group. Locoregional recurrence and mortality were comparable between both the groups. After stratifying RCTs with regards to adjuvant RNI, these parameters were still comparable to ALND.

Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggests that SLNB, with or without RNI, offers comparable OS and DFS to ALND for early breast cancer patients with metastasis-positive SLNs. However, the inclusion of studies that did not differentiate between micrometastases and macrometastases may introduce bias, particularly when assessing the impact of RNI. The role of RNI remains debated specially in those with macrometastases, and future research should focus on stratified analyses to clarify this. While SLNB represents a viable alternative to ALND, further trials are needed to define the optimal role in subgroups with high-risk tumor biology.

前哨淋巴结活检对早期乳腺癌和前哨淋巴结转移的腋窝淋巴结清扫:一项更新的系统综述和荟萃分析,特别关注局部复发和局部淋巴结照射。
背景:早期乳腺癌转移前哨淋巴结(sln)患者的治疗仍然是平衡生存结果和手术发病率的关键决策点。这项研究探讨了前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)加或不加区域淋巴结照射(RNI)是否能提供与腋窝淋巴结清扫(ALND)相当的生存结果。目的:评估SLNB(伴或不伴RNI)与ALND在转移阳性sln患者中的总生存期(OS)、无病生存期(DFS)、局部复发(LRR)和死亡率结果。设计:我们进行了一项更新的随机对照试验(rct)的荟萃分析,比较SLNB单独或RNI与ALND对早期乳腺癌转移性SLNs患者的疗效。资料来源和方法:入选标准包括比较SLNB±RNI与ALND治疗转移阳性SLN的随机对照试验。检索PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆和在线注册库,比较SLNB单独与ALND治疗转移阳性SLN的文章。使用Cochrane的修正工具(RoB)评估文章的偏倚风险。使用随机效应模型的主要汇总指标是风险比和风险比。结果:meta分析纳入了7项rct。与ALND组相比,SLNB组的总生存期和DFS优于ALND组。两组之间的局部复发率和死亡率具有可比性。在对rct进行辅助RNI分层后,这些参数仍与ALND相当。结论:这项荟萃分析表明,对于转移阳性SLNs的早期乳腺癌患者,SLNB,无论有无RNI,提供的OS和DFS与ALND相当。然而,纳入未区分微转移和大转移的研究可能会引入偏倚,特别是在评估RNI的影响时。RNI的作用仍然存在争议,特别是在那些有大转移的患者中,未来的研究应该集中在分层分析上以澄清这一点。虽然SLNB是ALND的可行替代方案,但需要进一步的试验来确定其在高风险肿瘤生物学亚组中的最佳作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.40%
发文量
22
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Breast Cancer: Basic and Clinical Research is an international, open access, peer-reviewed, journal which considers manuscripts on all areas of breast cancer research and treatment. We welcome original research, short notes, case studies and review articles related to breast cancer-related research. Specific areas of interest include, but are not limited to, breast cancer sub types, pathobiology, metastasis, genetics and epigenetics, mammary gland biology, breast cancer models, prevention, detection, therapy and clinical interventions, and epidemiology and population genetics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信