New steatotic liver disease criteria diagnostic performance in an agricultural population in Chile.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Maria Spencer-Sandino, Franco Godoy, Laura Huidobro, Danilo Alvares, Francisco Cruz, Claudia Marco, Macarena Garrido, Daniel Cabrera, Juan Pablo Arab, Marco Arrese, Francisco Barrera, Catterina Ferreccio
{"title":"New steatotic liver disease criteria diagnostic performance in an agricultural population in Chile.","authors":"Maria Spencer-Sandino, Franco Godoy, Laura Huidobro, Danilo Alvares, Francisco Cruz, Claudia Marco, Macarena Garrido, Daniel Cabrera, Juan Pablo Arab, Marco Arrese, Francisco Barrera, Catterina Ferreccio","doi":"10.1016/j.aohep.2025.101919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and objectives: </strong>This study aims to assess the performance of Steatotic Liver Disease (SLD) criteria in identifying liver steatosis compared to the NAFLD and MAFLD definitions in an agricultural population in Chile.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We performed a cross-sectional analysis on the MAUCO cohort, composed of 9,013 individuals aged 38 to 74. Health conditions, socio-demographics, anthropometrics, hepatic ultrasonography, blood pressure, and biological samples were obtained. Participants were classified as NAFLD, MAFLD, or any of the five SLD categories: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatosis liver disease (MASLD), Metabolic and Alcohol-Associated Liver Disease (MetALD), Alcohol-Associated Liver Disease (ALD), Specific aetiologies, and Cryptogenic. The Framingham cardiovascular risk score and BARD liver fibrosis score were used to assess clinical relevance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Liver steatosis was present in 4,082 participants (45%); SLD criteria captured an additional 176 individuals not classified under NAFLD and 103 not included under MAFLD definition. The main SLD subgroups were MASLD (95%), MetALD (1.9%) and ALD (1.3%). Individuals classified in the MetALD and ALD subgroups exhibited more severe liver steatosis and a higher cardiovascular risk. Notably, participants categorized under specific etiologies and cryptogenic subgroups were younger and had a higher risk for liver fibrosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study reveals that SLD offers a more inclusive classification to identify high-risk individuals in the Chilean population, capturing cases that could be missed by NAFLD or MAFLD definitions by using the same resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":7979,"journal":{"name":"Annals of hepatology","volume":" ","pages":"101919"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aohep.2025.101919","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and objectives: This study aims to assess the performance of Steatotic Liver Disease (SLD) criteria in identifying liver steatosis compared to the NAFLD and MAFLD definitions in an agricultural population in Chile.

Patients and methods: We performed a cross-sectional analysis on the MAUCO cohort, composed of 9,013 individuals aged 38 to 74. Health conditions, socio-demographics, anthropometrics, hepatic ultrasonography, blood pressure, and biological samples were obtained. Participants were classified as NAFLD, MAFLD, or any of the five SLD categories: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatosis liver disease (MASLD), Metabolic and Alcohol-Associated Liver Disease (MetALD), Alcohol-Associated Liver Disease (ALD), Specific aetiologies, and Cryptogenic. The Framingham cardiovascular risk score and BARD liver fibrosis score were used to assess clinical relevance.

Results: Liver steatosis was present in 4,082 participants (45%); SLD criteria captured an additional 176 individuals not classified under NAFLD and 103 not included under MAFLD definition. The main SLD subgroups were MASLD (95%), MetALD (1.9%) and ALD (1.3%). Individuals classified in the MetALD and ALD subgroups exhibited more severe liver steatosis and a higher cardiovascular risk. Notably, participants categorized under specific etiologies and cryptogenic subgroups were younger and had a higher risk for liver fibrosis.

Conclusions: The study reveals that SLD offers a more inclusive classification to identify high-risk individuals in the Chilean population, capturing cases that could be missed by NAFLD or MAFLD definitions by using the same resources.

新的脂肪变性肝病诊断标准在智利农业人口中的表现。
简介和目的:本研究旨在评估脂肪变性肝病(SLD)标准与NAFLD和MAFLD定义在智利农业人群中识别肝脏脂肪变性的性能。患者和方法:我们对MAUCO队列进行了横断面分析,该队列由9013名年龄在38至74岁之间的个体组成。获得健康状况、社会人口统计学、人体测量学、肝脏超声检查、血压和生物样本。参与者被归类为NAFLD、MAFLD或五种SLD类别中的任何一种:代谢功能障碍相关脂肪变性肝病(MASLD)、代谢和酒精相关肝病(MetALD)、酒精相关肝病(ALD)、特定病因和隐源性。Framingham心血管风险评分和BARD肝纤维化评分用于评估临床相关性。结果:4,082名参与者(45%)存在肝脏脂肪变性;SLD标准还包括176名未被归类为NAFLD的个体和103名未被纳入MAFLD定义的个体。主要的SLD亚组为MASLD(95%)、MetALD(1.9%)和ALD(1.3%)。被归类为MetALD和ALD亚组的个体表现出更严重的肝脏脂肪变性和更高的心血管风险。值得注意的是,在特定病因和隐基因亚组分类的参与者更年轻,肝纤维化的风险更高。结论:该研究表明,SLD提供了一个更具包容性的分类来识别智利人群中的高危个体,通过使用相同的资源,捕获了NAFLD或MAFLD定义可能遗漏的病例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of hepatology
Annals of hepatology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Hepatology publishes original research on the biology and diseases of the liver in both humans and experimental models. Contributions may be submitted as regular articles. The journal also publishes concise reviews of both basic and clinical topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信