Comparative efficacy and tolerability of currently approved incretin mimetics: A systematic analysis of placebo-controlled clinical trials.

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Yu Mi Kang, Viktoria Punov, Soo Lim, Michael A Nauck
{"title":"Comparative efficacy and tolerability of currently approved incretin mimetics: A systematic analysis of placebo-controlled clinical trials.","authors":"Yu Mi Kang, Viktoria Punov, Soo Lim, Michael A Nauck","doi":"10.1111/dom.16398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study compares the therapeutic efficacy, gastrointestinal (GI) adverse event (AE) rates and the relationship between the therapeutic efficacy and GI AEs in randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials (RCTs) of GLP-1 RAs and the dual GLP-1/GIP agonist tirzepatide.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic PubMed search identified 38 phase 3 or 4 placebo-controlled RCTs of exenatide (b.i.d. and q.w.), lixisenatide, liraglutide, dulaglutide, albiglutide, semaglutide (s.c. and oral) and tirzepatide with a total of 16 660 individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) across 104 study arms. Changes in HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose and body weight and the proportion of GI AEs (nausea, vomiting or diarrhoea) were calculated by agent, preparation and dose. The correlation between odds ratios (ORs) for GI AEs and the magnitude of therapeutic efficacy was assessed in a linear regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline characteristics were similar across studies: mean age 57 ± 10 years, diabetes duration 8 ± 6 years, body mass index (BMI) 31.9 ± 5.8 kg/m<sup>2</sup> and HbA1c 8.2% ± 0.9%. HbA1c reductions ranged from -0.63% ± 0.03% (lixisenatide, 20 μg q.d.) to -1.79% ± 0.09% (tirzepatide, 15 mg q.w.; p < 0.0001). Weight reductions ranged from -0.75 ± 0.10 kg to -9.65 ± 0.56 kg. Despite the high variability in therapeutic efficacy, ORs for GI AEs were similar across compounds/preparations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The magnitude of efficacy for intended therapeutic actions (HbA1c and body weight reduction) varied widely between incretin mimetic glucose-lowering agents. However, larger therapeutic efficacy was not systematically associated with higher GI AE or drug discontinuation rates, indicating better tolerability of the more effective agents/preparations.</p>","PeriodicalId":158,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.16398","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: This study compares the therapeutic efficacy, gastrointestinal (GI) adverse event (AE) rates and the relationship between the therapeutic efficacy and GI AEs in randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials (RCTs) of GLP-1 RAs and the dual GLP-1/GIP agonist tirzepatide.

Materials and methods: A systematic PubMed search identified 38 phase 3 or 4 placebo-controlled RCTs of exenatide (b.i.d. and q.w.), lixisenatide, liraglutide, dulaglutide, albiglutide, semaglutide (s.c. and oral) and tirzepatide with a total of 16 660 individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) across 104 study arms. Changes in HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose and body weight and the proportion of GI AEs (nausea, vomiting or diarrhoea) were calculated by agent, preparation and dose. The correlation between odds ratios (ORs) for GI AEs and the magnitude of therapeutic efficacy was assessed in a linear regression analysis.

Results: Baseline characteristics were similar across studies: mean age 57 ± 10 years, diabetes duration 8 ± 6 years, body mass index (BMI) 31.9 ± 5.8 kg/m2 and HbA1c 8.2% ± 0.9%. HbA1c reductions ranged from -0.63% ± 0.03% (lixisenatide, 20 μg q.d.) to -1.79% ± 0.09% (tirzepatide, 15 mg q.w.; p < 0.0001). Weight reductions ranged from -0.75 ± 0.10 kg to -9.65 ± 0.56 kg. Despite the high variability in therapeutic efficacy, ORs for GI AEs were similar across compounds/preparations.

Conclusions: The magnitude of efficacy for intended therapeutic actions (HbA1c and body weight reduction) varied widely between incretin mimetic glucose-lowering agents. However, larger therapeutic efficacy was not systematically associated with higher GI AE or drug discontinuation rates, indicating better tolerability of the more effective agents/preparations.

目前批准的肠促胰岛素模拟药物的比较疗效和耐受性:一项安慰剂对照临床试验的系统分析。
目的:本研究比较GLP-1 RAs与GLP-1/GIP双激动剂替西肽的随机、安慰剂对照临床试验(rct)的疗效、胃肠道(GI)不良事件(AE)发生率以及疗效与GI AE的关系。材料和方法:PubMed系统检索了38项3期或4期安慰剂对照随机对照试验,包括艾塞那肽(b.b.d和q.w)、利昔那肽、利拉鲁肽、dulaglutide、albiglutide、semaglutide (s.c和口服)和替西帕肽,共涉及104个研究组的16660名2型糖尿病(T2D)患者。通过药物、制剂和剂量计算HbA1c、空腹血糖和体重的变化以及胃肠道不良反应(恶心、呕吐或腹泻)的比例。通过线性回归分析评估GI ae的优势比(ORs)与治疗效果之间的相关性。结果:各研究的基线特征相似:平均年龄57±10岁,糖尿病病程8±6年,体重指数(BMI) 31.9±5.8 kg/m2,糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c) 8.2%±0.9%。HbA1c降低范围从-0.63%±0.03%(利昔那肽,20 μg q.w)到-1.79%±0.09%(替西帕肽,15 mg q.w);p结论:不同的肠促胰岛素类降糖药的预期治疗效果(HbA1c和体重降低)差异很大。然而,更大的治疗效果与更高的GI AE或停药率没有系统关联,这表明更有效的药物/制剂具有更好的耐受性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
319
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism is primarily a journal of clinical and experimental pharmacology and therapeutics covering the interrelated areas of diabetes, obesity and metabolism. The journal prioritises high-quality original research that reports on the effects of new or existing therapies, including dietary, exercise and lifestyle (non-pharmacological) interventions, in any aspect of metabolic and endocrine disease, either in humans or animal and cellular systems. ‘Metabolism’ may relate to lipids, bone and drug metabolism, or broader aspects of endocrine dysfunction. Preclinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetic studies, meta-analyses and those addressing drug safety and tolerability are also highly suitable for publication in this journal. Original research may be published as a main paper or as a research letter.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信