Barriers and strategies for recruitment of pregnant women in contemporary longitudinal birth cohort studies.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Slawa Rokicki, Amulya Gobburu, Melissa Weidner, Nashwah Azam, Michelle Jansen, Zorimar Rivera-Núñez, Adriana De Resende, Veenat Parmar, Gloria Bachmann, Nancy Reilly, Reynold Panettieri, Maria Gloria Dominguez-Bello, Daniel B Horton, Martin J Blaser, Emily S Barrett
{"title":"Barriers and strategies for recruitment of pregnant women in contemporary longitudinal birth cohort studies.","authors":"Slawa Rokicki, Amulya Gobburu, Melissa Weidner, Nashwah Azam, Michelle Jansen, Zorimar Rivera-Núñez, Adriana De Resende, Veenat Parmar, Gloria Bachmann, Nancy Reilly, Reynold Panettieri, Maria Gloria Dominguez-Bello, Daniel B Horton, Martin J Blaser, Emily S Barrett","doi":"10.1186/s12874-025-02570-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pregnancy and birth cohort studies are essential for studying the social and biological determinants of human health, yet racial and ethnic minority populations are underrepresented due to low recruitment and retention rates. Remote data collection has potential to improve recruitment of underrepresented populations. The aims of this descriptive qualitative study were to explore the perspectives of pregnant and postpartum women about the barriers and facilitators to enrolling themselves, their child, and their partner in a longitudinal birth cohort study, identify data collection strategies to address barriers, and generate recommendations for future cohort studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Online focus groups and in-person interviews in English and Spanish were conducted between August and November 2022 with pregnant and postpartum women. Participants were recruited from Black and Hispanic serving obstetric clinics and community-based health and social organizations to ensure a racially and ethnically diverse sample. Analysis was conducted using an inductive thematic approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>60 women participated in 10 focus groups and 11 interviews. Five themes emerged: challenges in committing time and resources to a research study; utility of compensation and resources; fears that research procedures would negatively impact child; concerns regarding data privacy and children's consent; and benefits for their family, community, and society. Black participants voiced concern about historical discrimination in science and mistrust of research, but also wanted to increase Black representation in research for future generations. Spanish-speaking participants expressed hesitancy related to fear of child injury and misuse of data. Women felt their partners would be reluctant to participate, but that incentives such as parental education would be motivating. Participants liked the flexibility of remote data collection in easing logistical challenges to participation but also expressed importance of personal study contact for facilitating access to resources, enhancing trust in the research process, and motivating retention. Participants also expressed the importance of transparency in data collection procedures and communication on study progress.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Leveraging technological advances in remote data collection may reduce some challenges to recruitment of women and families to birth cohort studies. However, building and maintaining trust among communities with engagement, transparency, and communication is critical for recruitment of underrepresented populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":9114,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","volume":"25 1","pages":"117"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12036123/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-025-02570-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pregnancy and birth cohort studies are essential for studying the social and biological determinants of human health, yet racial and ethnic minority populations are underrepresented due to low recruitment and retention rates. Remote data collection has potential to improve recruitment of underrepresented populations. The aims of this descriptive qualitative study were to explore the perspectives of pregnant and postpartum women about the barriers and facilitators to enrolling themselves, their child, and their partner in a longitudinal birth cohort study, identify data collection strategies to address barriers, and generate recommendations for future cohort studies.

Methods: Online focus groups and in-person interviews in English and Spanish were conducted between August and November 2022 with pregnant and postpartum women. Participants were recruited from Black and Hispanic serving obstetric clinics and community-based health and social organizations to ensure a racially and ethnically diverse sample. Analysis was conducted using an inductive thematic approach.

Results: 60 women participated in 10 focus groups and 11 interviews. Five themes emerged: challenges in committing time and resources to a research study; utility of compensation and resources; fears that research procedures would negatively impact child; concerns regarding data privacy and children's consent; and benefits for their family, community, and society. Black participants voiced concern about historical discrimination in science and mistrust of research, but also wanted to increase Black representation in research for future generations. Spanish-speaking participants expressed hesitancy related to fear of child injury and misuse of data. Women felt their partners would be reluctant to participate, but that incentives such as parental education would be motivating. Participants liked the flexibility of remote data collection in easing logistical challenges to participation but also expressed importance of personal study contact for facilitating access to resources, enhancing trust in the research process, and motivating retention. Participants also expressed the importance of transparency in data collection procedures and communication on study progress.

Conclusions: Leveraging technological advances in remote data collection may reduce some challenges to recruitment of women and families to birth cohort studies. However, building and maintaining trust among communities with engagement, transparency, and communication is critical for recruitment of underrepresented populations.

当代纵向出生队列研究中孕妇招募的障碍和策略。
背景:怀孕和出生队列研究对于研究人类健康的社会和生物决定因素至关重要,但由于招募和保留率低,种族和少数民族人口的代表性不足。远程数据收集有可能改善对代表性不足人口的招聘。本描述性定性研究的目的是探讨孕妇和产后妇女关于将自己、孩子和伴侣纳入纵向出生队列研究的障碍和促进因素的观点,确定数据收集策略以解决障碍,并为未来的队列研究提出建议。方法:于2022年8月至11月对孕妇和产后妇女进行在线焦点小组和面对面访谈。参与者是从为产科诊所服务的黑人和西班牙裔以及社区卫生和社会组织中招募的,以确保样本的种族和族裔多样化。分析采用归纳专题方法进行。结果:60名女性参加了10个焦点小组和11个访谈。出现了五个主题:投入时间和资源进行研究的挑战;报酬和资源的利用;担心研究程序会对儿童产生负面影响;对数据隐私和儿童同意的关注;对他们的家庭、社区和社会都有好处。黑人与会者对科学中的历史歧视和对研究的不信任表示担忧,但也希望为后代增加黑人在研究中的代表性。说西班牙语的与会者表示犹豫,因为担心儿童受伤和数据被滥用。女性认为她们的伴侣会不愿意参与,但父母教育等激励措施会起到激励作用。参与者喜欢远程数据收集的灵活性,因为它减轻了参与的后勤挑战,但也表达了个人研究联系对于促进资源获取、增强对研究过程的信任和激励保留的重要性。与会者还表示,数据收集程序和关于研究进展的通报必须具有透明度。结论:利用远程数据收集方面的技术进步可能会减少招募妇女和家庭参与出生队列研究的一些挑战。然而,通过参与、透明和沟通在社区之间建立和维持信任对于招募代表性不足的人口至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Research Methodology
BMC Medical Research Methodology 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
298
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Research Methodology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in methodological approaches to healthcare research. Articles on the methodology of epidemiological research, clinical trials and meta-analysis/systematic review are particularly encouraged, as are empirical studies of the associations between choice of methodology and study outcomes. BMC Medical Research Methodology does not aim to publish articles describing scientific methods or techniques: these should be directed to the BMC journal covering the relevant biomedical subject area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信