Ergonomics for Cleft Providers: A Systematic Review.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Annals of Plastic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1097/SAP.0000000000004346
Jose A Garcia, Wassim Najjar, Dana Andari, Roland K Assaf, Beyhan Annan, Adam Johnson, Raj Vyas, Jordan W Swanson, Usama S Hamdan
{"title":"Ergonomics for Cleft Providers: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Jose A Garcia, Wassim Najjar, Dana Andari, Roland K Assaf, Beyhan Annan, Adam Johnson, Raj Vyas, Jordan W Swanson, Usama S Hamdan","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cleft care providers, particularly surgeons, are at high risk for work-related musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) due to prolonged and repetitive procedures. Despite increasing recognition of ergonomics, comprehensive strategies to address this issue remain underexplored. This systematic review consolidates evidence on ergonomic challenges, practices, and interventions for cleft care surgeons to enhance their musculoskeletal well-being and optimize performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases was conducted for studies published between January 1, 2000, and July 20, 2023. Eligible studies focused on ergonomic challenges and interventions among cleft care surgeons. Screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were performed in duplicate following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Work-related MSDs were prevalent, with rates ranging from 47.5% to 97%. The most commonly reported symptoms occurred in the neck, shoulders, and lower back. Risk factors included years in practice, poor posture, and lack of ergonomic training. Recommendations included adopting visualization tools (eg, videoscopes, prismatic glasses), ergonomic devices, robotic-assisted surgery, and posture feedback systems. Ergonomic training and curricula were highlighted as essential for early intervention and long-term prevention. Barriers such as accessibility, cost, and implementation feasibility in resource-limited settings were noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MSDs are pervasive among cleft care providers, underscoring the urgent need for ergonomic interventions. Integrating ergonomic principles into practice, enhancing surgical training, and promoting tailored interventions for all cleft care disciplines are critical to improving provider health and career longevity. Implementing ergonomic strategies and integrating them into clinical practice can significantly improve provider well-being, reduce musculoskeletal disorders, and ensure career longevity across diverse clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":"94 5","pages":"612-622"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004346","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cleft care providers, particularly surgeons, are at high risk for work-related musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) due to prolonged and repetitive procedures. Despite increasing recognition of ergonomics, comprehensive strategies to address this issue remain underexplored. This systematic review consolidates evidence on ergonomic challenges, practices, and interventions for cleft care surgeons to enhance their musculoskeletal well-being and optimize performance.

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases was conducted for studies published between January 1, 2000, and July 20, 2023. Eligible studies focused on ergonomic challenges and interventions among cleft care surgeons. Screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were performed in duplicate following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria.

Results: Work-related MSDs were prevalent, with rates ranging from 47.5% to 97%. The most commonly reported symptoms occurred in the neck, shoulders, and lower back. Risk factors included years in practice, poor posture, and lack of ergonomic training. Recommendations included adopting visualization tools (eg, videoscopes, prismatic glasses), ergonomic devices, robotic-assisted surgery, and posture feedback systems. Ergonomic training and curricula were highlighted as essential for early intervention and long-term prevention. Barriers such as accessibility, cost, and implementation feasibility in resource-limited settings were noted.

Conclusions: MSDs are pervasive among cleft care providers, underscoring the urgent need for ergonomic interventions. Integrating ergonomic principles into practice, enhancing surgical training, and promoting tailored interventions for all cleft care disciplines are critical to improving provider health and career longevity. Implementing ergonomic strategies and integrating them into clinical practice can significantly improve provider well-being, reduce musculoskeletal disorders, and ensure career longevity across diverse clinical settings.

腭裂提供者的人体工程学:系统综述。
背景:由于长时间和重复的手术,唇腭裂护理提供者,特别是外科医生,患与工作相关的肌肉骨骼疾病(MSDs)的风险很高。尽管人们越来越认识到人体工程学,但解决这一问题的综合策略仍未得到充分探索。本系统综述整合了人体工程学挑战的证据,实践,以及腭裂护理外科医生的干预措施,以提高他们的肌肉骨骼健康和优化性能。方法:系统检索PubMed、Embase、谷歌Scholar和Cochrane数据库,检索2000年1月1日至2023年7月20日之间发表的研究。符合条件的研究集中于腭裂护理外科医生的人体工程学挑战和干预措施。筛选、数据提取和偏倚风险评估按照系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目一式两份进行。19项研究符合纳入标准。结果:与工作相关的msd普遍存在,比例从47.5%到97%不等。最常见的报告症状发生在颈部、肩部和下背部。危险因素包括多年的练习、不良的姿势和缺乏人体工程学训练。建议包括采用可视化工具(如录像机、棱镜眼镜)、人体工程学设备、机器人辅助手术和姿势反馈系统。强调人体工程学培训和课程对于早期干预和长期预防至关重要。他们指出了在资源有限的情况下可及性、成本和实施可行性等障碍。结论:msd在唇裂护理人员中普遍存在,强调了人体工程学干预的迫切需要。将人体工程学原理整合到实践中,加强外科培训,并促进针对所有唇腭裂护理学科的量身定制干预措施,对于改善提供者健康和职业寿命至关重要。实施人体工程学策略并将其整合到临床实践中可以显着改善提供者的福祉,减少肌肉骨骼疾病,并确保在不同临床环境中的职业寿命。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信