Improving interprofessional collaboration in pain clinics through simulation: a longitudinal Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale assessment.

IF 1.3 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
John Mekail, Ysaac Zegeye, Quinn Lanners, Muhammad Farooq Anwar, Peter K Yi
{"title":"Improving interprofessional collaboration in pain clinics through simulation: a longitudinal Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale assessment.","authors":"John Mekail, Ysaac Zegeye, Quinn Lanners, Muhammad Farooq Anwar, Peter K Yi","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Interprofessional collaboration (IPC) is vital for delivering safe, holistic patient care, particularly in outpatient interventional pain clinics where precision and teamwork are crucial. Despite its importance, IPC within outpatient pain medicine remains understudied, and the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS) has not been used longitudinally in outpatient pain medicine.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The primary objective of this quality improvement (QI) project was to evaluate and enhance readiness for interprofessional learning among clinical staff in an outpatient pain clinic, measured over 6 months in an outpatient pain clinic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This initiative took place from October 2021 to April 2022 in an academic institution's hospital-based outpatient pain clinic. We administered the RIPLS survey to 15 participants of various clinical roles at baseline and again 6 months after a simulation-based intervention. The simulation included small group didactic sessions and immersive clinical scenarios depicting acute complications in interventional pain procedures. We used descriptive statistics to compare preintervention and postintervention survey responses, stratifying by professional role. Qualitative feedback was collected to explore participants' perceptions of the training and its impact.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both physician and non-physician groups reported high baseline RIPLS scores, with no statistically significant difference between or within groups over 6 months. Although mean RIPLS scores did not significantly change, participants consistently described positive attitudes towards collaborative practice. Qualitative feedback underscored the importance of structured simulation for reinforcing team roles, communication strategies and crisis management skills.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This project demonstrates that simulation-based training can sustain high levels of interprofessional readiness among outpatient pain clinic staff over time, suggesting utility for maintaining collaborative behaviours in a setting where safety and teamwork are paramount. Future efforts could investigate whether similar interventions improve IPC in clinics with lower baseline readiness, as well as explore longer follow-up periods or larger sample sizes to detect nuanced changes in collaboration metrics.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"14 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12067847/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Interprofessional collaboration (IPC) is vital for delivering safe, holistic patient care, particularly in outpatient interventional pain clinics where precision and teamwork are crucial. Despite its importance, IPC within outpatient pain medicine remains understudied, and the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS) has not been used longitudinally in outpatient pain medicine.

Objectives: The primary objective of this quality improvement (QI) project was to evaluate and enhance readiness for interprofessional learning among clinical staff in an outpatient pain clinic, measured over 6 months in an outpatient pain clinic.

Methods: This initiative took place from October 2021 to April 2022 in an academic institution's hospital-based outpatient pain clinic. We administered the RIPLS survey to 15 participants of various clinical roles at baseline and again 6 months after a simulation-based intervention. The simulation included small group didactic sessions and immersive clinical scenarios depicting acute complications in interventional pain procedures. We used descriptive statistics to compare preintervention and postintervention survey responses, stratifying by professional role. Qualitative feedback was collected to explore participants' perceptions of the training and its impact.

Results: Both physician and non-physician groups reported high baseline RIPLS scores, with no statistically significant difference between or within groups over 6 months. Although mean RIPLS scores did not significantly change, participants consistently described positive attitudes towards collaborative practice. Qualitative feedback underscored the importance of structured simulation for reinforcing team roles, communication strategies and crisis management skills.

Conclusion: This project demonstrates that simulation-based training can sustain high levels of interprofessional readiness among outpatient pain clinic staff over time, suggesting utility for maintaining collaborative behaviours in a setting where safety and teamwork are paramount. Future efforts could investigate whether similar interventions improve IPC in clinics with lower baseline readiness, as well as explore longer follow-up periods or larger sample sizes to detect nuanced changes in collaboration metrics.

通过模拟改善疼痛诊所的跨专业合作:跨专业学习量表的纵向准备评估。
背景:跨专业合作(IPC)对于提供安全、全面的患者护理至关重要,特别是在门诊介入性疼痛诊所,精确度和团队合作至关重要。尽管IPC具有重要意义,但其在门诊疼痛医学中的研究仍不充分,并且跨专业学习准备量表(RIPLS)尚未在门诊疼痛医学中进行纵向应用。目的:本质量改进(QI)项目的主要目的是评估和提高门诊疼痛诊所临床工作人员跨专业学习的准备程度,在门诊疼痛诊所进行6个月的测量。方法:该计划于2021年10月至2022年4月在一家学术机构的医院门诊疼痛诊所进行。我们在基线和基于模拟的干预6个月后对15名不同临床角色的参与者进行了RIPLS调查。模拟包括小组教学会议和沉浸式临床场景,描述介入性疼痛手术的急性并发症。我们使用描述性统计来比较干预前和干预后的调查结果,按职业角色分层。收集了定性反馈,以探讨参与者对培训及其影响的看法。结果:医生组和非医生组均报告了较高的基线RIPLS评分,6个月以上各组之间或组内无统计学差异。虽然平均RIPLS分数没有显著变化,但参与者一致地描述了对合作实践的积极态度。定性反馈强调了结构化模拟对强化团队角色、沟通策略和危机管理技能的重要性。结论:该项目表明,基于模拟的培训可以在门诊疼痛诊所员工中长期保持高水平的跨专业准备,表明在安全和团队合作至关重要的环境中保持合作行为的效用。未来的努力可以调查类似的干预措施是否能改善基线准备程度较低的诊所的IPC,以及探索更长的随访期或更大的样本量,以发现合作指标的细微变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信