Intraocular lens calculation formula developed using artificial intelligence for ultrasonic biometry.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia Pub Date : 2025-04-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.5935/0004-2749.2024-0083
Victor Antonio Kuiava, Eliseu Luiz Kuiava, Eduardo Ottobeli Chielli, Diane Marinho Ruschel, Samara Bárbara Marafon
{"title":"Intraocular lens calculation formula developed using artificial intelligence for ultrasonic biometry.","authors":"Victor Antonio Kuiava, Eliseu Luiz Kuiava, Eduardo Ottobeli Chielli, Diane Marinho Ruschel, Samara Bárbara Marafon","doi":"10.5935/0004-2749.2024-0083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We developed an artificial intelligence program for calculating intraocular lenses and analyzed its accuracy rate via ultrasonic biometry. This endeavor is aimed at enhancing precision and efficacy in the selection of intraocular lenses, particularly in cases where optical biometry is unavailable.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data was collected from the Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, which included cases of phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation, in which the lens selection was based on ultrasonic biometry. The program, implemented in Python, Java, and PHP, employs the ridge regression method. Two design options were developed: a basic model, which uses only keratometry variables (K1 and K2), axial size and final target refraction in the spherical equivalent, and an advanced model, which incorporates preoperative refraction and the patient's age. The Universal Barrett II formula was used to compare both models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample consisted of 486 eyes from 313 patients, with 350 eyes used for program training and 136 for program validation. The spherical equivalent hit rates, with a variation of ±0.5 D, were 86% and 87.5% for the basic and advanced models, respectively, with no statistically significant difference between them. With the Barret Universal II formula, the success rate was 69%, which was significantly different from the values of the two aforementioned models (p<0.0001). The system was better for medium and long eyes but worse for short eyes (<=22.00 mm).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The developed artificial intelligence program was superior to the Barrett formula in terms of performance, in the general context and within the subgroup of patients with longer eyes. This innovation can considerably contribute to the selection of intraocular lenses, particularly in cases where optical biometry is unavailable.</p>","PeriodicalId":8397,"journal":{"name":"Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia","volume":"88 4","pages":"e20240083"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/0004-2749.2024-0083","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We developed an artificial intelligence program for calculating intraocular lenses and analyzed its accuracy rate via ultrasonic biometry. This endeavor is aimed at enhancing precision and efficacy in the selection of intraocular lenses, particularly in cases where optical biometry is unavailable.

Methods: Data was collected from the Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, which included cases of phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation, in which the lens selection was based on ultrasonic biometry. The program, implemented in Python, Java, and PHP, employs the ridge regression method. Two design options were developed: a basic model, which uses only keratometry variables (K1 and K2), axial size and final target refraction in the spherical equivalent, and an advanced model, which incorporates preoperative refraction and the patient's age. The Universal Barrett II formula was used to compare both models.

Results: The sample consisted of 486 eyes from 313 patients, with 350 eyes used for program training and 136 for program validation. The spherical equivalent hit rates, with a variation of ±0.5 D, were 86% and 87.5% for the basic and advanced models, respectively, with no statistically significant difference between them. With the Barret Universal II formula, the success rate was 69%, which was significantly different from the values of the two aforementioned models (p<0.0001). The system was better for medium and long eyes but worse for short eyes (<=22.00 mm).

Conclusion: The developed artificial intelligence program was superior to the Barrett formula in terms of performance, in the general context and within the subgroup of patients with longer eyes. This innovation can considerably contribute to the selection of intraocular lenses, particularly in cases where optical biometry is unavailable.

利用人工智能开发的人工晶状体计算公式进行超声生物计量。
目的:开发人工智能人工晶状体计算程序,并通过超声生物测量分析其准确率。这一努力旨在提高人工晶状体选择的准确性和有效性,特别是在光学生物测定不可用的情况下。方法:收集Clínicas de Porto Alegre医院超声乳化术合并人工晶状体植入术的病例资料,采用超声生物识别技术选择晶状体。该程序使用Python、Java和PHP实现,采用脊回归方法。开发了两种设计方案:一种是基本模型,仅使用角膜测量变量(K1和K2)、轴向尺寸和球体等效的最终目标屈光度;另一种是高级模型,包含术前屈光度和患者年龄。通用巴雷特II公式用于比较两种模型。结果:样本由来自313名患者的486只眼睛组成,其中350只眼睛用于程序训练,136只用于程序验证。基本型和高级型的球面等效命中率分别为86%和87.5%,变化幅度为±0.5 D,两者之间无统计学差异。Barret Universal II的成功率为69%,与上述两种模型的值有显著差异(p结论:所开发的人工智能程序在一般情况下以及在长眼患者亚组内的性能均优于Barrett公式。这一创新在很大程度上有助于人工晶状体的选择,特别是在无法进行光学生物测定的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
200
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The ABO-ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE OFTALMOLOGIA (ABO, ISSN 0004-2749 - print and ISSN 1678-2925 - (ABO, ISSN 0004-2749 - print and ISSN 1678-2925 - electronic version), the official bimonthly publication of the Brazilian Council of Ophthalmology (CBO), aims to disseminate scientific studies in Ophthalmology, Visual Science and Health public, by promoting research, improvement and updating of professionals related to the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信