Addressing food insecurity: a paediatric academic advocacy collaborative quality initiative.

IF 1.3 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
J Blakely Andrews Amati, Shivani Mehta, Talia Buitrago Mogollon, Lizmarie Maldonado, Kerry K Sease, Debra Best, Kimberly Montez, Emily Vander Schaaf, Elizabeth Erickson, Jeffrey Holloway, Kristina Gustafson, James Roberts, Carolyn Avery
{"title":"Addressing food insecurity: a paediatric academic advocacy collaborative quality initiative.","authors":"J Blakely Andrews Amati, Shivani Mehta, Talia Buitrago Mogollon, Lizmarie Maldonado, Kerry K Sease, Debra Best, Kimberly Montez, Emily Vander Schaaf, Elizabeth Erickson, Jeffrey Holloway, Kristina Gustafson, James Roberts, Carolyn Avery","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This quality improvement (QI) initiative aimed to address food insecurity (FI) by improving FI identification and referral to food assistance programmes for the families served by the eight paediatric academic institutions in North and South Carolina.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The primary process measures were screening 80% of eligible families for FI and coding for FI. The outcome measure was referring 80% of families identified with FI to appropriate resources. The balancing measure was maintaining a rate below 20% of missed opportunities for referral. Change ideas were organised into four main key drivers. The eight teaching clinics of the Carolinas Collaborative completed monthly chart audits using the Quality Improvement Data Aggregator (QIDA). Baseline was December 2020 and implementation occurred January 2021-May 2022. Creation of run charts was later transferred to statistical process control charts. Standard probability or Montgomery rules were used to identify special cause variation. Sites used individual QIDA data to conduct Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles; aggregated data were shared during bimonthly meetings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 4270 eligible charts were audited, 3430 patients screened and 525 identified as having FI. The rate of FI screening shifted from 68.5% to 86%. The rate of FI identified remained at 15%, and food referrals were consistently offered 90% of the time. While FI diagnostic coding did not reach the 80% goal, there was a shift from 38.3% to 70.5%. The balancing measure remained well below the goal of less than 20% of missed opportunities to discuss positive FI (centreline of 9.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A paediatric academic collaborative QI initiative focused on FI demonstrated collective improvement and allowed for rapid implementation, dissemination and spread.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"14 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12083299/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This quality improvement (QI) initiative aimed to address food insecurity (FI) by improving FI identification and referral to food assistance programmes for the families served by the eight paediatric academic institutions in North and South Carolina.

Methods: The primary process measures were screening 80% of eligible families for FI and coding for FI. The outcome measure was referring 80% of families identified with FI to appropriate resources. The balancing measure was maintaining a rate below 20% of missed opportunities for referral. Change ideas were organised into four main key drivers. The eight teaching clinics of the Carolinas Collaborative completed monthly chart audits using the Quality Improvement Data Aggregator (QIDA). Baseline was December 2020 and implementation occurred January 2021-May 2022. Creation of run charts was later transferred to statistical process control charts. Standard probability or Montgomery rules were used to identify special cause variation. Sites used individual QIDA data to conduct Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles; aggregated data were shared during bimonthly meetings.

Results: A total of 4270 eligible charts were audited, 3430 patients screened and 525 identified as having FI. The rate of FI screening shifted from 68.5% to 86%. The rate of FI identified remained at 15%, and food referrals were consistently offered 90% of the time. While FI diagnostic coding did not reach the 80% goal, there was a shift from 38.3% to 70.5%. The balancing measure remained well below the goal of less than 20% of missed opportunities to discuss positive FI (centreline of 9.5%).

Conclusions: A paediatric academic collaborative QI initiative focused on FI demonstrated collective improvement and allowed for rapid implementation, dissemination and spread.

解决粮食不安全问题:儿科学术倡导协作质量倡议。
目标:这一质量改进(QI)倡议旨在通过改善粮食不安全问题的识别和转介到北卡罗来纳州和南卡罗来纳州八所儿科学术机构所服务的家庭的粮食援助方案来解决粮食不安全问题。方法:主要流程措施是筛选80%的符合FI条件的家庭并对FI进行编码。结果衡量指标是将80%被确定为FI的家庭转介到适当的资源。平衡措施是将错过转诊机会的比率维持在20%以下。改变想法被组织成四个主要的关键驱动因素。卡罗来纳合作的八个教学诊所使用质量改进数据聚合器(QIDA)完成了月度图表审计。基准为2020年12月,实施时间为2021年1月至2022年5月。运行图的创建后来转移到统计过程控制图。标准概率或蒙哥马利规则用于识别特殊原因变化。站点使用单个QIDA数据进行计划-执行-研究-行动循环;在两个月一次的会议上分享了汇总数据。结果:共审核了4270张符合条件的图表,筛选了3430名患者,525名患者被确定为FI。FI筛查率由68.5%上升至86%。确定的FI率保持在15%,并且90%的时间内始终提供食物推荐。虽然FI诊断编码没有达到80%的目标,但从38.3%转移到70.5%。平衡措施仍然远低于低于20%的目标,即错过讨论积极FI的机会(中间线为9.5%)。结论:以FI为重点的儿科学术协作性QI倡议证明了集体改善,并允许快速实施、传播和传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信