Trauma referral audit impact assessment on the outcomes of injured patients via an interrupted time-series analysis: an 11-year before-and-after study of trauma cases at the Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai hospital, Thailand.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Patrinee Traisathit, Kaweesak Chittawatanarat, Kamtone Chandacham, Pimwarat Srikummoon, Areerat Kittikhunakon, Chalermrat Nontapa, Narain Chotirosniramit
{"title":"Trauma referral audit impact assessment on the outcomes of injured patients via an interrupted time-series analysis: an 11-year before-and-after study of trauma cases at the Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai hospital, Thailand.","authors":"Patrinee Traisathit, Kaweesak Chittawatanarat, Kamtone Chandacham, Pimwarat Srikummoon, Areerat Kittikhunakon, Chalermrat Nontapa, Narain Chotirosniramit","doi":"10.1186/s12873-025-01220-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Overcrowding in emergency departments (EDs) due to injured patients who do not need urgent treatment can lead to less efficacious healthcare outcomes for those that do. The trauma referral audit (TRA) was developed to support medical staff and ensure that the injured receive treatment timely and efficiently.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on 14,399 injured patients referred to Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital between 2007 and 2017 were analyzed to examine the impact of the full TRA program implemented at the end of 2010. Injury severity was measured by using the injury severity score (ISS) whereby a score > 9 points infers severe injury. The impact of the establishment of TRA was examined using the trend of referrals and an interrupted time-series analysis of monthly mortality among patients with severe injury.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median ISS of the patients in 2010 was 9 [4-18] and slightly increased to the highest score of 16 [8-25] in 2017. The proportion of patients with less severe injuries (ISS ≤ 9) decreased after the full implementation of TRA (55.4% in 2010 compared to 42.3% in 2017). Overall mortality was 6% (5.5% vs. 6.2% for the pre- and post-full TRA periods, respectively), and the mortality rate tended to increase from 4.77% in 2011 to 7.59 in 2017. The monthly mortality rate was estimated at 7.22% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 5.89-8.56%] with a significant increase of mortality in the post-full TRA period by 1.57% [0.16-2.98%] and in the annual trend of 0.11% [0.05-0.16%]. However, when considering severely injured patients only, the level and trend of the mortality rate were no different.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the TRA program could help reduce patient overcrowding in EDs, it does not reduce the risk of mortality. Revision of the referral and in-hospital care guidelines accounting for these relevant factors might lead to a decrease in mortality.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinical trial number: Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9002,"journal":{"name":"BMC Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"64"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12007129/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-025-01220-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Overcrowding in emergency departments (EDs) due to injured patients who do not need urgent treatment can lead to less efficacious healthcare outcomes for those that do. The trauma referral audit (TRA) was developed to support medical staff and ensure that the injured receive treatment timely and efficiently.

Methods: Data on 14,399 injured patients referred to Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital between 2007 and 2017 were analyzed to examine the impact of the full TRA program implemented at the end of 2010. Injury severity was measured by using the injury severity score (ISS) whereby a score > 9 points infers severe injury. The impact of the establishment of TRA was examined using the trend of referrals and an interrupted time-series analysis of monthly mortality among patients with severe injury.

Results: The median ISS of the patients in 2010 was 9 [4-18] and slightly increased to the highest score of 16 [8-25] in 2017. The proportion of patients with less severe injuries (ISS ≤ 9) decreased after the full implementation of TRA (55.4% in 2010 compared to 42.3% in 2017). Overall mortality was 6% (5.5% vs. 6.2% for the pre- and post-full TRA periods, respectively), and the mortality rate tended to increase from 4.77% in 2011 to 7.59 in 2017. The monthly mortality rate was estimated at 7.22% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 5.89-8.56%] with a significant increase of mortality in the post-full TRA period by 1.57% [0.16-2.98%] and in the annual trend of 0.11% [0.05-0.16%]. However, when considering severely injured patients only, the level and trend of the mortality rate were no different.

Conclusions: Although the TRA program could help reduce patient overcrowding in EDs, it does not reduce the risk of mortality. Revision of the referral and in-hospital care guidelines accounting for these relevant factors might lead to a decrease in mortality.

Trial registration: Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

创伤转诊审计通过中断时间序列分析对受伤患者结局的影响评估:泰国清迈Maharaj Nakorn医院11年创伤病例的前后研究。
背景:由于不需要紧急治疗的受伤患者,急诊部门(EDs)人满为患,可能导致那些需要紧急治疗的患者的医疗效果较差。制定创伤转诊审计(TRA)是为了支持医务人员,确保伤者得到及时有效的治疗。方法:分析2007年至2017年在Maharaj Nakorn清迈医院转诊的14,399名受伤患者的数据,以检查2010年底实施的完整TRA计划的影响。使用损伤严重程度评分(ISS)来测量损伤严重程度,其中得分> - 9分推断严重损伤。使用转诊趋势和严重损伤患者每月死亡率的中断时间序列分析来检查TRA的建立的影响。结果:2010年患者的ISS中位数为9分[4-18],2017年略有上升,最高为16分[8-25]。全面实施TRA后,较轻损伤(ISS≤9)患者比例下降(2010年为55.4%,2017年为42.3%)。总死亡率为6%(全部TRA前后分别为5.5%和6.2%),死亡率有从2011年的4.77%上升到2017年的7.59%的趋势。月死亡率估计为7.22%[95%可信区间(CI) = 5.89 ~ 8.56%], TRA完全期后死亡率显著增加1.57%[0.16 ~ 2.98%],年趋势为0.11%[0.05 ~ 0.16%]。然而,当仅考虑严重损伤患者时,死亡率水平和趋势没有差异。结论:尽管TRA项目可以帮助减少急诊科患者的过度拥挤,但它并不能降低死亡风险。考虑到这些相关因素的转诊和住院护理指南的修订可能导致死亡率的降低。试验注册:临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Emergency Medicine
BMC Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
8.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Emergency Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all urgent and emergency aspects of medicine, in both practice and basic research. In addition, the journal covers aspects of disaster medicine and medicine in special locations, such as conflict areas and military medicine, together with articles concerning healthcare services in the emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信