The Role of Genicular Nerve Blocks in Enhancing Postoperative Pain Management After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Study.

IF 1.6 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anesthesiology Research and Practice Pub Date : 2025-05-06 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/anrp/8827996
Yuki Aoyama, Shinichi Sakura, Yoshimi Nakaji, Kornkanok Yuwapattanawong, Tetsuro Nikai
{"title":"The Role of Genicular Nerve Blocks in Enhancing Postoperative Pain Management After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Yuki Aoyama, Shinichi Sakura, Yoshimi Nakaji, Kornkanok Yuwapattanawong, Tetsuro Nikai","doi":"10.1155/anrp/8827996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is associated with intense postoperative pain, for which continuous femoral triangle block (FTB) and infiltration between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee (iPACK) block have been used. Genicular nerves supply sensation to a part of the knee joint that the two blocks do not affect, so we recently started adding genicular nerve blocks (GNBs) to the combination of FTB and iPACK block. In this retrospective study, we examined to see if the addition of GNBs benefited patients undergoing TKA. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a retrospective analysis of data that had been collected prospectively from patients undergoing TKA and receiving our standard analgesic regimen including continuous FTB and iPACK block in our hospital. We compared patients with and without GNBs regarding intra- and postoperative data including the time needed for block performance, visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, analgesic requirements, and adverse events. The two-tailed Student's <i>t</i> test, Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> test, chi-square test, and Fisher's exact test were used for statistical analysis. <b>Results:</b> Seventy-four patients including 41 and 33 patients with and without GNBs, respectively, were evaluated. The demographics of the patients were comparable. VAS pain score at rest on postoperative day 1 was not different between patients who received GNBs and those who did not (20 [0-36] vs. 25 [19-45] in median [IQR], <i>p</i> = 0.205). Other measurements related to postoperative pain were also similar throughout the two postoperative days. No severe complications related to blocks were observed. <b>Conclusion:</b> The results of this exploratory retrospective study suggest that the additional benefits of GNBs, if any, are limited for the early postoperative period when combined with continuous FTB and iPACK block in patients undergoing TKA. However, larger, sufficiently powered, and more robust clinical trials are needed to confirm the present results.</p>","PeriodicalId":7834,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology Research and Practice","volume":"2025 ","pages":"8827996"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12074850/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/anrp/8827996","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is associated with intense postoperative pain, for which continuous femoral triangle block (FTB) and infiltration between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee (iPACK) block have been used. Genicular nerves supply sensation to a part of the knee joint that the two blocks do not affect, so we recently started adding genicular nerve blocks (GNBs) to the combination of FTB and iPACK block. In this retrospective study, we examined to see if the addition of GNBs benefited patients undergoing TKA. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of data that had been collected prospectively from patients undergoing TKA and receiving our standard analgesic regimen including continuous FTB and iPACK block in our hospital. We compared patients with and without GNBs regarding intra- and postoperative data including the time needed for block performance, visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, analgesic requirements, and adverse events. The two-tailed Student's t test, Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test, and Fisher's exact test were used for statistical analysis. Results: Seventy-four patients including 41 and 33 patients with and without GNBs, respectively, were evaluated. The demographics of the patients were comparable. VAS pain score at rest on postoperative day 1 was not different between patients who received GNBs and those who did not (20 [0-36] vs. 25 [19-45] in median [IQR], p = 0.205). Other measurements related to postoperative pain were also similar throughout the two postoperative days. No severe complications related to blocks were observed. Conclusion: The results of this exploratory retrospective study suggest that the additional benefits of GNBs, if any, are limited for the early postoperative period when combined with continuous FTB and iPACK block in patients undergoing TKA. However, larger, sufficiently powered, and more robust clinical trials are needed to confirm the present results.

膝神经阻滞在全膝关节置换术后疼痛管理中的作用:一项回顾性研究。
背景:全膝关节置换术(TKA)与术后剧烈疼痛相关,连续股骨三角阻滞(FTB)和腘动脉与膝关节后囊之间浸润阻滞(iPACK)已被采用。膝部神经为两种阻滞不影响的膝关节部分提供感觉,因此我们最近开始在FTB和iPACK阻滞的组合中加入膝部神经阻滞(GNBs)。在这项回顾性研究中,我们检查了gnb的加入是否对TKA患者有益。方法:我们对在我院接受TKA并接受我们的标准镇痛方案(包括连续FTB和iPACK阻滞)的患者前瞻性收集的数据进行回顾性分析。我们比较了有gnb和没有gnb的患者的手术内和术后数据,包括阻滞表现所需的时间、视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分、镇痛需求和不良事件。采用双尾Student’st检验、Mann-Whitney U检验、卡方检验和Fisher确切检验进行统计分析。结果:74例患者,其中有gnb患者41例,无gnb患者33例。患者的人口统计数据具有可比性。术后第1天,接受GNBs治疗的患者和未接受GNBs治疗的患者休息时VAS疼痛评分无差异(中位数[IQR] 20[0-36]比25 [19-45],p = 0.205)。术后两天内与术后疼痛相关的其他测量也相似。未见与阻滞相关的严重并发症。结论:这项探索性回顾性研究的结果表明,gnb在TKA患者术后早期联合持续FTB和iPACK阻滞时的额外益处(如果有的话)有限。然而,需要更大规模、更有力、更可靠的临床试验来证实目前的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信