Enhancing Transthyretin Binding Affinity Prediction with a Consensus Model: Insights from the Tox24 Challenge.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
Chemical Research in Toxicology Pub Date : 2025-05-19 Epub Date: 2025-04-26 DOI:10.1021/acs.chemrestox.4c00560
Xiaolin Pan, Yaowen Gu, Weijun Zhou, Yingkai Zhang
{"title":"Enhancing Transthyretin Binding Affinity Prediction with a Consensus Model: Insights from the Tox24 Challenge.","authors":"Xiaolin Pan, Yaowen Gu, Weijun Zhou, Yingkai Zhang","doi":"10.1021/acs.chemrestox.4c00560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Transthyretin (TTR) plays a vital role in thyroid hormone transport and homeostasis in both the blood and target tissues. Interactions between exogenous compounds and TTR can disrupt the function of the endocrine system, potentially causing toxicity. In the Tox24 challenge, we leveraged the data set provided by the organizers to develop a deep learning-based consensus model, integrating sPhysNet, KANO, and GGAP-CPI for predicting TTR binding affinity. Each model utilized distinct levels of molecular information, including 2D topology, 3D geometry, and protein-ligand interactions. Our consensus model achieved favorable performance on the blind test set, yielding an RMSE of 20.8 and ranking fifth among all submissions. Following the release of the blind test set, we incorporated the leaderboard test set into our training data, further reducing the RMSE to 20.6 in an offlineretrospective study. These results demonstrate that combining three regression models across different modalities significantly enhances the predictive accuracy. Furthermore, we employ the standard deviation of the consensus model's ensemble outputs as an uncertainty estimate. Our analysis reveals that both the RMSE and interval error of predictions increase with rising uncertainty, indicating that the uncertainty can serve as a useful measure of prediction confidence. We believe that this consensus model can be a valuable resource for identifying potential TTR binders and predicting their binding affinity in silico. The source code for data preparation, model training, and prediction can be accessed at https://github.com/xiaolinpan/tox24_challenge_submission_yingkai_lab.</p>","PeriodicalId":31,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Research in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"900-908"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12093365/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Research in Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.4c00560","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transthyretin (TTR) plays a vital role in thyroid hormone transport and homeostasis in both the blood and target tissues. Interactions between exogenous compounds and TTR can disrupt the function of the endocrine system, potentially causing toxicity. In the Tox24 challenge, we leveraged the data set provided by the organizers to develop a deep learning-based consensus model, integrating sPhysNet, KANO, and GGAP-CPI for predicting TTR binding affinity. Each model utilized distinct levels of molecular information, including 2D topology, 3D geometry, and protein-ligand interactions. Our consensus model achieved favorable performance on the blind test set, yielding an RMSE of 20.8 and ranking fifth among all submissions. Following the release of the blind test set, we incorporated the leaderboard test set into our training data, further reducing the RMSE to 20.6 in an offlineretrospective study. These results demonstrate that combining three regression models across different modalities significantly enhances the predictive accuracy. Furthermore, we employ the standard deviation of the consensus model's ensemble outputs as an uncertainty estimate. Our analysis reveals that both the RMSE and interval error of predictions increase with rising uncertainty, indicating that the uncertainty can serve as a useful measure of prediction confidence. We believe that this consensus model can be a valuable resource for identifying potential TTR binders and predicting their binding affinity in silico. The source code for data preparation, model training, and prediction can be accessed at https://github.com/xiaolinpan/tox24_challenge_submission_yingkai_lab.

用共识模型增强转甲状腺素结合亲和力预测:来自Tox24挑战的见解。
甲状腺转素(TTR)在血液和靶组织中对甲状腺激素的转运和稳态起着至关重要的作用。外源性化合物与TTR之间的相互作用可以破坏内分泌系统的功能,可能导致毒性。在Tox24挑战中,我们利用组织者提供的数据集开发了一个基于深度学习的共识模型,集成了sPhysNet、KANO和GGAP-CPI,用于预测TTR结合亲和力。每个模型利用不同水平的分子信息,包括二维拓扑结构、三维几何结构和蛋白质-配体相互作用。我们的共识模型在盲测集上取得了良好的表现,RMSE为20.8,在所有提交的模型中排名第五。在盲测试集发布之后,我们将排行榜测试集纳入我们的训练数据中,在离线回顾性研究中将RMSE进一步降低到20.6。这些结果表明,将三种不同模式的回归模型组合在一起可以显著提高预测精度。此外,我们采用共识模型的集成输出的标准差作为不确定性估计。我们的分析表明,预测的均方根误差和区间误差都随着不确定性的增加而增加,这表明不确定性可以作为预测置信度的有用度量。我们相信这个共识模型可以成为识别潜在的TTR结合物和预测它们在硅上的结合亲和力的宝贵资源。数据准备、模型训练和预测的源代码可以在https://github.com/xiaolinpan/tox24_challenge_submission_yingkai_lab上访问。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
7.30%
发文量
215
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Chemical Research in Toxicology publishes Articles, Rapid Reports, Chemical Profiles, Reviews, Perspectives, Letters to the Editor, and ToxWatch on a wide range of topics in Toxicology that inform a chemical and molecular understanding and capacity to predict biological outcomes on the basis of structures and processes. The overarching goal of activities reported in the Journal are to provide knowledge and innovative approaches needed to promote intelligent solutions for human safety and ecosystem preservation. The journal emphasizes insight concerning mechanisms of toxicity over phenomenological observations. It upholds rigorous chemical, physical and mathematical standards for characterization and application of modern techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信