Adverse Outcome Pathway and Machine Learning to Predict Drug Induced Seizure Liability.

IF 4.1 3区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
ACS Chemical Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-06-04 Epub Date: 2025-05-14 DOI:10.1021/acschemneuro.5c00177
Thomas R Lane, Scott H Snyder, Joshua S Harris, Fabio Urbina, Sean Ekins
{"title":"Adverse Outcome Pathway and Machine Learning to Predict Drug Induced Seizure Liability.","authors":"Thomas R Lane, Scott H Snyder, Joshua S Harris, Fabio Urbina, Sean Ekins","doi":"10.1021/acschemneuro.5c00177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Central nervous system (CNS) drugs have the highest clinical attrition, often due to CNS-related toxicities such as drug-induced seizures (DIS). Early prediction of DIS risk could reduce failure rates and optimize drug development by prioritizing testing in experimental models of DIS. Using seizure-relevant Adverse Outcome Pathways (AOPs) from various sources, we identified 67 seizure-associated protein targets. Biological activity data (EC<sub>50</sub>, IC<sub>50</sub>, <i>K</i><sub>i</sub>) for these targets were curated from ChEMBL, enabling development of ∼2000 regression and classification (random forest, support vector, XGBoost) models. Support vector regression (SVR) models achieved an average MAE of 0.54  ±  0.09 (-log <i>M</i>), while random forest classifiers yielded mean ROC AUC, accuracy, and recall of 0.88, 0.85, and 0.70, respectively (5-fold CV) across all targets. Multitarget XGBoost models concatenating ECFP6 fingerprints and target encodings (one-hot or ProtBERT) also demonstrated excellent overall performance, although their predictive accuracy was notably lower for leave-out sets compared to individual target-specific models. These models were used to predict activity for a seizure-liability data set with target-annotated DIS risk predictions. Overall, our findings support the utility of using target-specific machine-learning models for DIS prediction to aid in early toxicity testing prioritization and reduce CNS drug attrition.</p>","PeriodicalId":13,"journal":{"name":"ACS Chemical Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"2085-2099"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12136986/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Chemical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.5c00177","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Central nervous system (CNS) drugs have the highest clinical attrition, often due to CNS-related toxicities such as drug-induced seizures (DIS). Early prediction of DIS risk could reduce failure rates and optimize drug development by prioritizing testing in experimental models of DIS. Using seizure-relevant Adverse Outcome Pathways (AOPs) from various sources, we identified 67 seizure-associated protein targets. Biological activity data (EC50, IC50, Ki) for these targets were curated from ChEMBL, enabling development of ∼2000 regression and classification (random forest, support vector, XGBoost) models. Support vector regression (SVR) models achieved an average MAE of 0.54  ±  0.09 (-log M), while random forest classifiers yielded mean ROC AUC, accuracy, and recall of 0.88, 0.85, and 0.70, respectively (5-fold CV) across all targets. Multitarget XGBoost models concatenating ECFP6 fingerprints and target encodings (one-hot or ProtBERT) also demonstrated excellent overall performance, although their predictive accuracy was notably lower for leave-out sets compared to individual target-specific models. These models were used to predict activity for a seizure-liability data set with target-annotated DIS risk predictions. Overall, our findings support the utility of using target-specific machine-learning models for DIS prediction to aid in early toxicity testing prioritization and reduce CNS drug attrition.

不良后果途径和机器学习预测药物诱发癫痫发作责任。
中枢神经系统(CNS)药物具有最高的临床损耗,通常是由于中枢神经系统相关的毒性,如药物引起的癫痫发作(DIS)。早期预测癫痫发作风险可以降低失败率,并通过在疾病发作的实验模型中优先测试来优化药物开发。利用来自不同来源的癫痫发作相关不良结果通路(AOPs),我们确定了67个癫痫发作相关蛋白靶点。这些靶点的生物活性数据(EC50, IC50, Ki)从ChEMBL中进行整理,从而开发了~ 2000回归和分类(随机森林,支持向量,XGBoost)模型。支持向量回归(SVR)模型的平均MAE为0.54 ± 0.09 (-log M),而随机森林分类器在所有目标上的平均ROC AUC、准确率和召回率分别为0.88、0.85和0.70(5倍CV)。连接ECFP6指纹和目标编码(one-hot或ProtBERT)的多目标XGBoost模型也显示出出色的整体性能,尽管与单个目标特定模型相比,它们对遗漏集的预测精度明显较低。这些模型用于预测癫痫发作责任数据集的活动,并伴有目标注释的DIS风险预测。总的来说,我们的研究结果支持使用目标特异性机器学习模型进行DIS预测的效用,以帮助早期毒性测试确定优先级并减少中枢神经系统药物损耗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
ACS Chemical Neuroscience BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY-CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
323
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: ACS Chemical Neuroscience publishes high-quality research articles and reviews that showcase chemical, quantitative biological, biophysical and bioengineering approaches to the understanding of the nervous system and to the development of new treatments for neurological disorders. Research in the journal focuses on aspects of chemical neurobiology and bio-neurochemistry such as the following: Neurotransmitters and receptors Neuropharmaceuticals and therapeutics Neural development—Plasticity, and degeneration Chemical, physical, and computational methods in neuroscience Neuronal diseases—basis, detection, and treatment Mechanism of aging, learning, memory and behavior Pain and sensory processing Neurotoxins Neuroscience-inspired bioengineering Development of methods in chemical neurobiology Neuroimaging agents and technologies Animal models for central nervous system diseases Behavioral research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信