The Impact of Integrated Health Management in Hospital Administration: A Systematic Literature Review Applying the ProKnow-C Methodology

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Damián Encalada Avila, David Naranjo Gil
{"title":"The Impact of Integrated Health Management in Hospital Administration: A Systematic Literature Review Applying the ProKnow-C Methodology","authors":"Damián Encalada Avila,&nbsp;David Naranjo Gil","doi":"10.1111/jep.70125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Rationale, Aims and Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Integrated health management represents a pivotal strategy for enhancing both operational efficiency and the quality of care in hospital environments. This study undertakes a systematic literature review to examine the influence of integrated health management on hospital administration. The principal aim is to synthesise a structured body of knowledge capable of informing strategic clinical decision-making and shaping future research trajectories.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This investigation employed the Constructivist Knowledge Development Process (ProKnow-C), a methodological framework implemented in four sequential stages: (i) the selection of pertinent peer-reviewed literature to construct a representative portfolio; (ii) bibliometric analysis to evaluate the impact and consistency of sources; (iii) systemic analysis to categorise thematic dimensions; and (iv) the identification of research gaps and prospective avenues for investigation. A total of 20 scholarly articles were scrutinised using both quantitative and qualitative criteria.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Three principal approaches to integrated hospital management were identified: (1) the utilisation of management tools—such as the Balanced Scorecard and performance indicators—to improve service delivery efficiency; (2) strategies for performance enhancement, underpinned by strategic planning, detailed operational analysis, and robust internal controls; and (3) financial management approaches, grounded in hospital information systems and evidence-based decision-making. Bibliometric findings confirmed the internal coherence of the selected portfolio, while the systemic analysis demonstrated the presence of shared conceptual frameworks throughout the literature.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This systematic review contributed to the consolidation of a structured knowledge base concerning integrated hospital management and highlighted critical areas for future research. Further enquiry is warranted into models for clinical risk mitigation, the optimisation of resource allocation, and the development of financially viable management practices. The ProKnow-C methodology proved robust and suitable for guiding research within the domains of clinical evaluation and healthcare management.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70125","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale, Aims and Objectives

Integrated health management represents a pivotal strategy for enhancing both operational efficiency and the quality of care in hospital environments. This study undertakes a systematic literature review to examine the influence of integrated health management on hospital administration. The principal aim is to synthesise a structured body of knowledge capable of informing strategic clinical decision-making and shaping future research trajectories.

Methods

This investigation employed the Constructivist Knowledge Development Process (ProKnow-C), a methodological framework implemented in four sequential stages: (i) the selection of pertinent peer-reviewed literature to construct a representative portfolio; (ii) bibliometric analysis to evaluate the impact and consistency of sources; (iii) systemic analysis to categorise thematic dimensions; and (iv) the identification of research gaps and prospective avenues for investigation. A total of 20 scholarly articles were scrutinised using both quantitative and qualitative criteria.

Results

Three principal approaches to integrated hospital management were identified: (1) the utilisation of management tools—such as the Balanced Scorecard and performance indicators—to improve service delivery efficiency; (2) strategies for performance enhancement, underpinned by strategic planning, detailed operational analysis, and robust internal controls; and (3) financial management approaches, grounded in hospital information systems and evidence-based decision-making. Bibliometric findings confirmed the internal coherence of the selected portfolio, while the systemic analysis demonstrated the presence of shared conceptual frameworks throughout the literature.

Conclusions

This systematic review contributed to the consolidation of a structured knowledge base concerning integrated hospital management and highlighted critical areas for future research. Further enquiry is warranted into models for clinical risk mitigation, the optimisation of resource allocation, and the development of financially viable management practices. The ProKnow-C methodology proved robust and suitable for guiding research within the domains of clinical evaluation and healthcare management.

综合健康管理对医院管理的影响:应用ProKnow-C方法的系统文献综述
基本原理、目的和目标综合健康管理是提高医院环境中运营效率和护理质量的关键战略。本研究透过系统的文献回顾,探讨整合健康管理对医院行政管理的影响。主要目的是合成一个结构化的知识体系,能够为战略性临床决策提供信息,并塑造未来的研究轨迹。方法本研究采用建构主义知识发展过程(ProKnow-C),这是一个分四个阶段实施的方法学框架:(i)选择相关的同行评议文献构建具有代表性的作品集;文献计量学分析,评价来源的影响和一致性;系统分析,对主题方面进行分类;(iv)确定研究差距和未来的调查途径。总共有20篇学术文章使用定量和定性标准进行了仔细审查。结果确定了医院综合管理的三种主要方法:(1)利用平衡计分卡和绩效指标等管理工具提高服务提供效率;(2)以战略规划、详细的运营分析和健全的内部控制为基础的绩效提升战略;(3)以医院信息系统和循证决策为基础的财务管理方法。文献计量学结果证实了所选组合的内部一致性,而系统分析则证明了整个文献中存在共享的概念框架。本系统综述有助于巩固有关综合医院管理的结构化知识库,并突出了未来研究的关键领域。进一步的调查是必要的临床风险缓解模型,资源分配的优化,并在财政上可行的管理实践的发展。ProKnow-C方法被证明是强大的,适合于临床评估和医疗保健管理领域的指导研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信