From process simulation to life cycle assessment: Generating life cycle inventory for the eco-design of essential oil extraction – A case study on Eucalyptus intertexta

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Zouhour Limam , Catherine Azzaro-Pantel , Noureddine Hajjaji , Mehrez Romdhane , Jalloul Bouajila
{"title":"From process simulation to life cycle assessment: Generating life cycle inventory for the eco-design of essential oil extraction – A case study on Eucalyptus intertexta","authors":"Zouhour Limam ,&nbsp;Catherine Azzaro-Pantel ,&nbsp;Noureddine Hajjaji ,&nbsp;Mehrez Romdhane ,&nbsp;Jalloul Bouajila","doi":"10.1016/j.compchemeng.2025.109140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Essential oils from aromatic plants are increasingly sought after for applications in the food, cosmetic, and pharmaceutical sectors. This study investigates and compares two eco-friendly extraction processes for essential oils derived from Tunisian Eucalyptus leaves: supercritical fluid extraction and water distillation extraction. A comprehensive environmental impact assessment was conducted using Life Cycle Assessment with a functional unit of 1 kg of essential oil to enable direct comparison.</div><div>Process modeling using Aspen Plus® simulation software is used to generate Life Cycle Inventory of both processes. The Unifac-Dortmund model was employed to estimate liquid-phase activity coefficients, while the Hayden-O'Connell equation of state simulated vapor-phase behavior. The processes were scaled from laboratory and pilot levels to industrial production, achieving an annual capacity of 9 tons of essential oil.</div><div>Results show that supercritical fluid extraction, which uses CO<sub>2</sub> in a supercritical state, is significantly more energy-efficient and environmentally sustainable. Producing 1 kg of essential oil via supercritical fluid extraction required only 1.4 MJ of energy and resulted in 2.32 kg of CO<sub>2</sub>-equivalent emissions, compared to water distillation extraction, which consumed 12.44 MJ of energy and resulted in 5.51 kg of CO<sub>2</sub>-equivalent emissions. To further enhance the sustainability of supercritical fluid extraction, hydrosol—a by-product of distillation—was valorized. Additionally, waste by-products were combusted to generate electricity and heat, which were reintegrated into the process, improving overall energy efficiency.</div><div>An economic allocation approach was applied to distribute environmental impacts fairly across the co-products. This study highlights the environmental and energy performance of supercritical fluid extraction, emphasizing its potential for scaling as a sustainable alternative to conventional extraction methods.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":286,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Chemical Engineering","volume":"200 ","pages":"Article 109140"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0098135425001449","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Essential oils from aromatic plants are increasingly sought after for applications in the food, cosmetic, and pharmaceutical sectors. This study investigates and compares two eco-friendly extraction processes for essential oils derived from Tunisian Eucalyptus leaves: supercritical fluid extraction and water distillation extraction. A comprehensive environmental impact assessment was conducted using Life Cycle Assessment with a functional unit of 1 kg of essential oil to enable direct comparison.
Process modeling using Aspen Plus® simulation software is used to generate Life Cycle Inventory of both processes. The Unifac-Dortmund model was employed to estimate liquid-phase activity coefficients, while the Hayden-O'Connell equation of state simulated vapor-phase behavior. The processes were scaled from laboratory and pilot levels to industrial production, achieving an annual capacity of 9 tons of essential oil.
Results show that supercritical fluid extraction, which uses CO2 in a supercritical state, is significantly more energy-efficient and environmentally sustainable. Producing 1 kg of essential oil via supercritical fluid extraction required only 1.4 MJ of energy and resulted in 2.32 kg of CO2-equivalent emissions, compared to water distillation extraction, which consumed 12.44 MJ of energy and resulted in 5.51 kg of CO2-equivalent emissions. To further enhance the sustainability of supercritical fluid extraction, hydrosol—a by-product of distillation—was valorized. Additionally, waste by-products were combusted to generate electricity and heat, which were reintegrated into the process, improving overall energy efficiency.
An economic allocation approach was applied to distribute environmental impacts fairly across the co-products. This study highlights the environmental and energy performance of supercritical fluid extraction, emphasizing its potential for scaling as a sustainable alternative to conventional extraction methods.
从过程模拟到生命周期评估:为精油提取的生态设计生成生命周期清单——桉叶桉的案例研究
芳香植物的精油在食品、化妆品和制药领域的应用越来越受到追捧。本研究调查并比较了突尼斯桉树叶精油的两种环保提取工艺:超临界流体提取和水蒸馏提取。采用生命周期评估方法进行全面的环境影响评估,功能单位为1公斤精油,以便进行直接比较。使用Aspen Plus®仿真软件进行过程建模,用于生成两个过程的生命周期清单。采用uniface - dortmund模型估计液相活度系数,Hayden-O'Connell状态方程模拟气相行为。这些工艺从实验室和试点水平扩展到工业生产,实现了9吨精油的年生产能力。结果表明,超临界流体萃取在超临界状态下使用二氧化碳,具有显著的节能和环境可持续性。通过超临界流体萃取生产1公斤精油只需要1.4兆焦耳的能量,导致2.32公斤的二氧化碳当量排放,而水蒸馏提取消耗12.44兆焦耳的能量,导致5.51公斤的二氧化碳当量排放。为了进一步提高超临界流体萃取的可持续性,对蒸馏副产物氢溶胶进行了评价。此外,废物副产品被燃烧以产生电能和热能,这些电能和热能被重新整合到生产过程中,从而提高了整体能源效率。采用经济分配方法将环境影响公平地分配给各副产品。这项研究强调了超临界流体萃取的环境和能源性能,强调了它作为传统萃取方法的可持续替代方案的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computers & Chemical Engineering
Computers & Chemical Engineering 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
14.00%
发文量
374
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Computers & Chemical Engineering is primarily a journal of record for new developments in the application of computing and systems technology to chemical engineering problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信