From headlines to hashtags: How media platforms shape smart city acceptance

IF 3.4 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Reza Shaker
{"title":"From headlines to hashtags: How media platforms shape smart city acceptance","authors":"Reza Shaker","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper examines the evolution of legitimation strategies in smart urban transformation through a cross-platform analysis of Singapore’s Smart Nation initiative. Drawing on multiple theoretical perspectives—including discursive legitimation theory, strategic ambiguity theory, collaborative ecosystem frameworks, and elements of justification theory—we analyse 3,146 newspaper articles (1989–2024) and 1,713 tweets (2014–2023) using a mixed-methods approach. Our findings reveal three distinct phases in legitimation strategies: an early technology-centric phase (1989–2013), a transitional citizen-focused phase (2014–2018), and a contemporary phase addressing AI and ethical considerations (2019–2024). We develop the Platform-Specific Legitimation Framework (PSLF) to theorise how traditional media enables “institutional anchoring” through authorisation-based legitimation and industrial worth, while social media facilitates “distributed interpretation” through moral evaluation and civic worth. The framework identifies three key cross-platform dynamics—narrative reinforcement, strategic ambiguity, and adaptive governance—mediated by intermediaries who translate institutional narratives across platforms. This study advances urban studies scholarship by demonstrating how different orders of worth operate across media environments, revealing the temporal dynamics of cross-platform legitimation, and theorising how institutional and social media discourses interact in urban transformation. Our findings suggest the need for collaborative ecosystem governance approaches that can effectively operate across diverse media environments while maintaining coherent smart city narratives.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"163 ","pages":"Article 104320"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718525001204","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines the evolution of legitimation strategies in smart urban transformation through a cross-platform analysis of Singapore’s Smart Nation initiative. Drawing on multiple theoretical perspectives—including discursive legitimation theory, strategic ambiguity theory, collaborative ecosystem frameworks, and elements of justification theory—we analyse 3,146 newspaper articles (1989–2024) and 1,713 tweets (2014–2023) using a mixed-methods approach. Our findings reveal three distinct phases in legitimation strategies: an early technology-centric phase (1989–2013), a transitional citizen-focused phase (2014–2018), and a contemporary phase addressing AI and ethical considerations (2019–2024). We develop the Platform-Specific Legitimation Framework (PSLF) to theorise how traditional media enables “institutional anchoring” through authorisation-based legitimation and industrial worth, while social media facilitates “distributed interpretation” through moral evaluation and civic worth. The framework identifies three key cross-platform dynamics—narrative reinforcement, strategic ambiguity, and adaptive governance—mediated by intermediaries who translate institutional narratives across platforms. This study advances urban studies scholarship by demonstrating how different orders of worth operate across media environments, revealing the temporal dynamics of cross-platform legitimation, and theorising how institutional and social media discourses interact in urban transformation. Our findings suggest the need for collaborative ecosystem governance approaches that can effectively operate across diverse media environments while maintaining coherent smart city narratives.
从标题到标签:媒体平台如何塑造智慧城市的接受度
本文通过对新加坡智慧国家倡议的跨平台分析,考察了智慧城市转型中合法化战略的演变。利用多种理论视角——包括话语合法化理论、战略歧义理论、协作生态系统框架和正当化理论的要素——我们使用混合方法分析了3146篇报纸文章(1989-2024)和1713条推文(2014-2023)。我们的研究结果揭示了合法化战略的三个不同阶段:早期以技术为中心的阶段(1989-2013),过渡的以公民为中心的阶段(2014-2018),以及解决人工智能和伦理考虑的当代阶段(2019-2024)。我们开发了平台特定的合法化框架(PSLF),以理论化传统媒体如何通过基于授权的合法化和产业价值实现“制度锚定”,而社交媒体如何通过道德评价和公民价值促进“分布式解释”。该框架确定了三个关键的跨平台动态——叙事强化、战略模糊性和适应性治理——由中介机构在平台上翻译制度叙事。本研究通过展示不同的价值秩序如何在媒体环境中运作,揭示跨平台合法化的时间动态,并将制度和社交媒体话语如何在城市转型中相互作用理论化,从而推进了城市研究的学术研究。我们的研究结果表明,需要协作的生态系统治理方法,在保持连贯的智慧城市叙事的同时,有效地在不同的媒体环境中运作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geoforum
Geoforum GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
201
期刊介绍: Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信