Refining the known extent of major onshore Quaternary glaciation in the UK — Types of evidence, nomenclature and uncertainty

IF 1.2 4区 地球科学 Q2 Earth and Planetary Sciences
Jonathan R. Lee , Sam Roberson
{"title":"Refining the known extent of major onshore Quaternary glaciation in the UK — Types of evidence, nomenclature and uncertainty","authors":"Jonathan R. Lee ,&nbsp;Sam Roberson","doi":"10.1016/j.pgeola.2024.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Repeated cycles of Quaternary glaciation have had a major impact on the morphology and shallow sub-surface properties of much of the UK landscape and continental shelf. Understanding the extent of glaciation involves understanding of our landscape history but is also critical to the broad range of applied users that interact with the shallow sub-surface including engineers, hydrogeologists, planners and decision makers. Numerous interpretations of the onshore extent of the Anglian and Late Devensian glaciations have been published. However, many are not clearly evidenced or justified, being sometimes based on anecdotal evidence or supposition, with the levels of associated uncertainty not effectively communicated. As part of this work, the long-term record of Quaternary glaciation within the UK is reviewed and the types of geological and geomorphological information that can be employed to interpret their former extent are assessed. We also examine the range of factors that may influence the relative preservation of this evidence. As part of this assessment, we recommend abandoning the term ‘glacial limit’ (and other related synonyms) when interpreting the extent of glaciation within the geological record. Instead, we recommend using the term <em>limit of preserved evidence</em> which more accurately reflects the spatial context of such evidence. Finally, we present new onshore linework for the limit of preserved evidence of both the Anglian and Late Devensian glaciations, presenting how this linework was captured and the associated levels of uncertainty.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49672,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Geologists Association","volume":"136 3","pages":"Article 101087"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Geologists Association","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016787824000683","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Repeated cycles of Quaternary glaciation have had a major impact on the morphology and shallow sub-surface properties of much of the UK landscape and continental shelf. Understanding the extent of glaciation involves understanding of our landscape history but is also critical to the broad range of applied users that interact with the shallow sub-surface including engineers, hydrogeologists, planners and decision makers. Numerous interpretations of the onshore extent of the Anglian and Late Devensian glaciations have been published. However, many are not clearly evidenced or justified, being sometimes based on anecdotal evidence or supposition, with the levels of associated uncertainty not effectively communicated. As part of this work, the long-term record of Quaternary glaciation within the UK is reviewed and the types of geological and geomorphological information that can be employed to interpret their former extent are assessed. We also examine the range of factors that may influence the relative preservation of this evidence. As part of this assessment, we recommend abandoning the term ‘glacial limit’ (and other related synonyms) when interpreting the extent of glaciation within the geological record. Instead, we recommend using the term limit of preserved evidence which more accurately reflects the spatial context of such evidence. Finally, we present new onshore linework for the limit of preserved evidence of both the Anglian and Late Devensian glaciations, presenting how this linework was captured and the associated levels of uncertainty.
细化英国主要陆上第四纪冰川的已知范围——证据类型、命名法和不确定性
第四纪冰期的反复循环对英国大部分景观和大陆架的形态和浅层次表层特性产生了重大影响。了解冰川作用的程度包括了解我们的景观历史,但对与浅层地下互动的广泛应用用户(包括工程师、水文地质学家、规划师和决策者)也至关重要。已经发表了许多关于盎格鲁和晚德文世冰期的陆上范围的解释。然而,许多都没有明确的证据或理由,有时是基于轶事证据或假设,相关的不确定性程度没有得到有效沟通。作为这项工作的一部分,回顾了英国第四纪冰川的长期记录,并评估了可用于解释其以前范围的地质和地貌信息类型。我们还研究了可能影响这一证据相对保存的各种因素。作为评估的一部分,我们建议在解释地质记录中的冰川作用范围时放弃使用“冰川极限”(以及其他相关的同义词)一词。相反,我们建议使用保存证据的期限限制,这更准确地反映了这些证据的空间背景。最后,我们针对保存下来的盎格鲁和晚德文世冰期证据的限制,提出了新的陆上线条图,并介绍了如何捕获这些线条图以及相关的不确定性水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
54
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Proceedings of the Geologists'' Association is an international geoscience journal that was founded in 1859 and publishes research and review papers on all aspects of Earth Science. In particular, papers will focus on the geology of northwestern Europe and the Mediterranean, including both the onshore and offshore record. Following a long tradition, the PGA will focus on: i) a range of article types (see below) on topics of wide relevance to Earth Sciences ii) papers on aspects of Earth Science that have societal relevance including geoconservation and Earth management, iii) papers on palaeoenvironments and palaeontology of the Mesozoic and Cenozoic, iv) papers on aspects of Quaternary geology and climate change, and v) papers on the history of geology with particular reference to individuals that have shaped the subject. These topics will also steer the content of the themes of the Special Issues that are published in the PGA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信