Bayesian Inference of Binding Kinetics from Fluorescence Time Series

IF 2.9 2区 化学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
J. Shepard Bryan IV, Stanimir Asenov Tashev, Mohamadreza Fazel, Michael Scheckenbach, Philip Tinnefeld, Dirk-Peter Herten* and Steve Pressé*, 
{"title":"Bayesian Inference of Binding Kinetics from Fluorescence Time Series","authors":"J. Shepard Bryan IV,&nbsp;Stanimir Asenov Tashev,&nbsp;Mohamadreza Fazel,&nbsp;Michael Scheckenbach,&nbsp;Philip Tinnefeld,&nbsp;Dirk-Peter Herten* and Steve Pressé*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.jpcb.5c0118010.1021/acs.jpcb.5c01180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >The study of binding kinetics via the analysis of fluorescence time traces is often confounded by measurement noise and photophysics. Although photoblinking can be mitigated by using labels less likely to photoswitch, photobleaching generally cannot be eliminated. Current methods for measuring binding and unbinding rates are, therefore, limited by concurrent photobleaching events. Here, we propose a method to infer binding and unbinding rates alongside photobleaching rates using fluorescence intensity traces. Our approach is a two-stage process involving analyzing individual regions of interest (ROIs) with a hidden Markov model to infer the fluorescence intensity levels of each trace. We then use the inferred intensity level state trajectory from all of the ROIs to infer kinetic rates. Our method has several advantages, including the ability to analyze noisy traces, account for the presence of photobleaching events, and provide uncertainties associated with the inferred binding kinetics. We demonstrate the effectiveness and reliability of our method through simulations and data from DNA origami binding experiments.</p>","PeriodicalId":60,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Physical Chemistry B","volume":"129 19","pages":"4670–4681 4670–4681"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Physical Chemistry B","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpcb.5c01180","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study of binding kinetics via the analysis of fluorescence time traces is often confounded by measurement noise and photophysics. Although photoblinking can be mitigated by using labels less likely to photoswitch, photobleaching generally cannot be eliminated. Current methods for measuring binding and unbinding rates are, therefore, limited by concurrent photobleaching events. Here, we propose a method to infer binding and unbinding rates alongside photobleaching rates using fluorescence intensity traces. Our approach is a two-stage process involving analyzing individual regions of interest (ROIs) with a hidden Markov model to infer the fluorescence intensity levels of each trace. We then use the inferred intensity level state trajectory from all of the ROIs to infer kinetic rates. Our method has several advantages, including the ability to analyze noisy traces, account for the presence of photobleaching events, and provide uncertainties associated with the inferred binding kinetics. We demonstrate the effectiveness and reliability of our method through simulations and data from DNA origami binding experiments.

Abstract Image

荧光时间序列结合动力学的贝叶斯推断
通过分析荧光时间轨迹来研究结合动力学常常受到测量噪声和光物理的干扰。虽然使用不太可能发生光开关的标签可以减轻光闪烁,但通常不能消除光漂白。因此,目前测量结合和解结合率的方法受到同时发生的光漂白事件的限制。在这里,我们提出了一种方法来推断结合和解结合率和光漂白率使用荧光强度痕迹。我们的方法是一个两阶段的过程,包括用隐马尔可夫模型分析单个感兴趣区域(roi),以推断每个痕量的荧光强度水平。然后,我们使用从所有roi推断的强度水平状态轨迹来推断动力学速率。我们的方法有几个优点,包括分析噪声痕迹的能力,解释光漂白事件的存在,并提供与推断的结合动力学相关的不确定性。通过模拟实验和DNA折纸结合实验数据验证了该方法的有效性和可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
965
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: An essential criterion for acceptance of research articles in the journal is that they provide new physical insight. Please refer to the New Physical Insights virtual issue on what constitutes new physical insight. Manuscripts that are essentially reporting data or applications of data are, in general, not suitable for publication in JPC B.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信