Incidence and risk stratification of caller noncompliance with dispatcher instructions for cardiopulmonary resuscitation

IF 1.5 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Keita Shibahashi, Norikazu Nonoguchi, Ken Inoue, Taichi Kato, Kazuhiro Sugiyama
{"title":"Incidence and risk stratification of caller noncompliance with dispatcher instructions for cardiopulmonary resuscitation","authors":"Keita Shibahashi,&nbsp;Norikazu Nonoguchi,&nbsp;Ken Inoue,&nbsp;Taichi Kato,&nbsp;Kazuhiro Sugiyama","doi":"10.1002/ams2.70057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to describe the incidence of, identify risk factors for, and develop a simple risk-scoring model for cases where callers fail to follow dispatcher instructions regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Using the Tokyo Fire Department's database, cases of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in adults where callers received dispatcher instructions regarding CPR between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2022 were identified. Factors associated with noncompliance with CPR instructions were determined using multivariable logistic regression analysis. A simple scoring model was developed to stratify the caller noncompliance probability.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Overall, 19,525 cases were included. Bystander CPR was not provided in 11,443 (58.6%) of these cases; the 1-month favorable neurological outcome rate was significantly lower in this group (1.1% vs. 2.2%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Regression analysis revealed that patient age, male patient sex, emergency call at night, cardiac arrest in the bathroom, and a familial relationship between the caller and the patient were significantly associated with noncompliance. The scoring model assigned 1 point for each of the following criteria: patient aged ≥65 years, familial relationship between the caller and the patient, and cardiac arrest in the bathroom. It also stratified caller noncompliance probability, with scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3 corresponding to probabilities of 48.0%, 50.8%, 61.3%, and 70.5%, respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>We found that callers frequently did not follow dispatcher CPR instructions and identified risk factors for caller noncompliance. Furthermore, the simple scoring model developed effectively stratified the probability of caller noncompliance associated with dispatcher instructions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7196,"journal":{"name":"Acute Medicine & Surgery","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ams2.70057","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acute Medicine & Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ams2.70057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

This study aimed to describe the incidence of, identify risk factors for, and develop a simple risk-scoring model for cases where callers fail to follow dispatcher instructions regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Methods

Using the Tokyo Fire Department's database, cases of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in adults where callers received dispatcher instructions regarding CPR between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2022 were identified. Factors associated with noncompliance with CPR instructions were determined using multivariable logistic regression analysis. A simple scoring model was developed to stratify the caller noncompliance probability.

Results

Overall, 19,525 cases were included. Bystander CPR was not provided in 11,443 (58.6%) of these cases; the 1-month favorable neurological outcome rate was significantly lower in this group (1.1% vs. 2.2%, p < 0.001). Regression analysis revealed that patient age, male patient sex, emergency call at night, cardiac arrest in the bathroom, and a familial relationship between the caller and the patient were significantly associated with noncompliance. The scoring model assigned 1 point for each of the following criteria: patient aged ≥65 years, familial relationship between the caller and the patient, and cardiac arrest in the bathroom. It also stratified caller noncompliance probability, with scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3 corresponding to probabilities of 48.0%, 50.8%, 61.3%, and 70.5%, respectively.

Conclusion

We found that callers frequently did not follow dispatcher CPR instructions and identified risk factors for caller noncompliance. Furthermore, the simple scoring model developed effectively stratified the probability of caller noncompliance associated with dispatcher instructions.

呼叫者不遵守调度员心肺复苏指示的发生率和风险分层
本研究旨在描述院外心脏骤停的发生率,识别危险因素,并开发一个简单的风险评分模型,用于呼叫者未能遵循调度员关于心肺复苏(CPR)的指示。方法利用东京消防局的数据库,确定2018年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间呼救者收到调度员有关心肺复苏指示的成人院外心脏骤停病例。使用多变量logistic回归分析确定与不遵守CPR指示相关的因素。建立了一个简单的评分模型,对呼叫者不服从概率进行分层。结果共纳入19525例。11443例(58.6%)患者未接受旁观者心肺复苏术;该组1个月良好神经转归率显著低于对照组(1.1% vs. 2.2%, p < 0.001)。回归分析显示,患者年龄、男性患者性别、夜间紧急呼叫、浴室内心脏骤停以及呼叫者与患者之间的家庭关系与不遵医嘱显著相关。评分模型对以下标准分别给予1分:患者年龄≥65岁,呼叫者与患者之间的家庭关系,以及在浴室中心脏骤停。它还对呼叫者不服从概率进行了分层,得分0、1、2和3分别对应48.0%、50.8%、61.3%和70.5%的概率。结论:我们发现呼叫者经常不遵守调度员的CPR指令,并确定了呼叫者不遵守指令的危险因素。此外,开发的简单评分模型有效地分层了与调度指令相关的调用者不遵守的概率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acute Medicine & Surgery
Acute Medicine & Surgery MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
12.50%
发文量
87
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信