Identifying risk factors for adverse lung health outcomes among rural Appalachian women

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jessica R. Thompson PhD, Courtney J. Walker PhD, John C. Flunker PhD, W. Jay Christian PhD, Wayne T. Sanderson PhD, Nancy E. Schoenberg PhD, Steven R. Browning PhD
{"title":"Identifying risk factors for adverse lung health outcomes among rural Appalachian women","authors":"Jessica R. Thompson PhD,&nbsp;Courtney J. Walker PhD,&nbsp;John C. Flunker PhD,&nbsp;W. Jay Christian PhD,&nbsp;Wayne T. Sanderson PhD,&nbsp;Nancy E. Schoenberg PhD,&nbsp;Steven R. Browning PhD","doi":"10.1111/jrh.70035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Despite high rates of lung disease and lung cancer among women, few studies have focused on adverse lung health risk factors among rural Appalachian women. We aim to describe the prevalence of demographic, behavioral, and economic characteristics among a cohort of rural Appalachian women and ascertain the association between these risk factors and lung function.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Through a cross-sectional study in two rural Appalachian Kentucky counties (2015–2017), we collected demographics, health history/behaviors, and lung function via pulmonary function tests. Restricting to female participants with interpretable pulmonary function tests (<i>N</i> = 456), we estimated prevalence ratios of the association between individual-level characteristics and lung function using log binomial regression.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Reduced lung function was high among this sample, including 20.8% with restrictive function and 18.4% with obstructive function. After adjustment, those age 65+ had 7× the prevalence of obstructive function compared to those &lt;45 years, and current smokers had 6× the prevalence of never-smokers. Conversely, those age 45–64 had over 5× the prevalence of restrictive function compared to those &lt;45 years, and participants with an obese-classified BMI or 2+ co-morbidities had nearly 4× the prevalence of restrictive function compared to those with normal BMI or without a comorbid condition, respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This study highlights the high levels of reduced lung function among rural Appalachian women, including varying risk factors between those with restrictive and obstructive function. The high prevalence of restrictive function among middle-aged women with high BMI, poor cardiovascular health, and multiple comorbidities suggests the need for culturally tailored health behavior interventions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"41 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jrh.70035","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.70035","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Despite high rates of lung disease and lung cancer among women, few studies have focused on adverse lung health risk factors among rural Appalachian women. We aim to describe the prevalence of demographic, behavioral, and economic characteristics among a cohort of rural Appalachian women and ascertain the association between these risk factors and lung function.

Methods

Through a cross-sectional study in two rural Appalachian Kentucky counties (2015–2017), we collected demographics, health history/behaviors, and lung function via pulmonary function tests. Restricting to female participants with interpretable pulmonary function tests (N = 456), we estimated prevalence ratios of the association between individual-level characteristics and lung function using log binomial regression.

Findings

Reduced lung function was high among this sample, including 20.8% with restrictive function and 18.4% with obstructive function. After adjustment, those age 65+ had 7× the prevalence of obstructive function compared to those <45 years, and current smokers had 6× the prevalence of never-smokers. Conversely, those age 45–64 had over 5× the prevalence of restrictive function compared to those <45 years, and participants with an obese-classified BMI or 2+ co-morbidities had nearly 4× the prevalence of restrictive function compared to those with normal BMI or without a comorbid condition, respectively.

Conclusions

This study highlights the high levels of reduced lung function among rural Appalachian women, including varying risk factors between those with restrictive and obstructive function. The high prevalence of restrictive function among middle-aged women with high BMI, poor cardiovascular health, and multiple comorbidities suggests the need for culturally tailored health behavior interventions.

Abstract Image

确定阿巴拉契亚农村妇女不良肺部健康结果的危险因素
尽管妇女中肺病和肺癌的发病率很高,但很少有研究关注阿巴拉契亚农村妇女中不利的肺部健康风险因素。我们的目的是描述阿巴拉契亚农村妇女队列中人口统计学、行为和经济特征的患病率,并确定这些危险因素与肺功能之间的关系。方法通过对肯塔基州阿巴拉契亚两个农村县(2015-2017)的横断面研究,通过肺功能测试收集人口统计学、健康史/行为和肺功能。研究对象为具有可解释肺功能测试的女性受试者(N = 456),我们使用对数二项回归估计了个体水平特征与肺功能之间关联的患病率。本组患者肺功能降低率较高,其中限制性肺功能20.8%,阻塞性肺功能18.4%。调整后,65岁以上人群的阻塞性功能患病率是45岁人群的7倍,目前吸烟者的患病率是不吸烟者的6倍。相反,45 - 64岁的参与者的限制性功能患病率是45岁人群的5倍以上,BMI为肥胖或2+合并症的参与者的限制性功能患病率是BMI正常或无合并症的参与者的近4倍。结论:该研究强调了阿巴拉契亚农村妇女肺功能降低的高水平,包括限制性和阻塞性肺功能的不同危险因素。在具有高BMI、心血管健康状况差和多种合并症的中年妇女中,限制性功能的高流行率表明,需要针对不同文化进行健康行为干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Rural Health
Journal of Rural Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Health, a quarterly journal published by the NRHA, offers a variety of original research relevant and important to rural health. Some examples include evaluations, case studies, and analyses related to health status and behavior, as well as to health work force, policy and access issues. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies are welcome. Highest priority is given to manuscripts that reflect scholarly quality, demonstrate methodological rigor, and emphasize practical implications. The journal also publishes articles with an international rural health perspective, commentaries, book reviews and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信