Optimization of radiochemical purity assessment for [68Ga]Ga-EDOTREOTIDE (Somakit-TOC®): a shortened r-TLC method for improved PET radiopharmaceutical workflow

IF 4.4 Q1 CHEMISTRY, INORGANIC & NUCLEAR
Arnaud Deschavannes, Kazuma Terashi, Marie Piquemal, Catherine Rioufol, Anthony Clotagatide
{"title":"Optimization of radiochemical purity assessment for [68Ga]Ga-EDOTREOTIDE (Somakit-TOC®): a shortened r-TLC method for improved PET radiopharmaceutical workflow","authors":"Arnaud Deschavannes,&nbsp;Kazuma Terashi,&nbsp;Marie Piquemal,&nbsp;Catherine Rioufol,&nbsp;Anthony Clotagatide","doi":"10.1186/s41181-025-00341-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The increasing use of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-based radiopharmaceuticals in PET imaging, requires efficient quality control procedures. The standard r-TLC method for verifying [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-EDOTREOTIDE (Somakit-TOC<sup>®</sup>) radiochemical purity (RCP) is time-consuming, creating workflow challenges in radiopharmacies. This study evaluates an optimized r-TLC method with a reduced migration distance (4 cm vs. 9 cm) to improve efficiency while maintaining analytical reliability. Tests for specificity, accuracy and robustness were performed using ITLC-SG – Acetate and ITLC-SG – Citrate systems. Additionally, migration time was analyzed to evaluate whether the alternative method could offer added benefits.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean Rs for ITLC-SG – Acetate at 4 cm was 2.43 ± 0.28, while for ITLC-SG – Citrate with added [⁶⁸Ga]GaCl₃ was 5.58 ± 0.23, both exceeding the threshold of 1.5. The mean RCP at 4 cm was 98.90% ± 0.25%, and 99.21% ± 0.19% at 9 cm, with [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-uncomplexed remaining within acceptable limits. No [⁶⁸Ga]GaCl₃ was detected. The coefficient of variation (CV) for RCP between methods was &lt; 2% (0.22%). Operator-based analysis yielded a mean Rs of 3.95 ± 0.06 (CV = 1.52%) and a mean [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-EDOTREOTIDE percentage of 99.60% ± 0.03% (CV = 0.03%). Migration times were significantly reduced with the alternative method (85% reduction).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Shortening the migration distance in r-TLC did not compromise specificity, accuracy or robustness while significantly reducing analysis time. The proposed method enhances PET radiopharmaceutical workflows, allowing faster patient dose preparation without quality loss. This approach could be investigated to other [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-labeled compounds, supporting improved clinical and research applications in nuclear medicine.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":534,"journal":{"name":"EJNMMI Radiopharmacy and Chemistry","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ejnmmipharmchem.springeropen.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s41181-025-00341-y","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJNMMI Radiopharmacy and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41181-025-00341-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, INORGANIC & NUCLEAR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The increasing use of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-based radiopharmaceuticals in PET imaging, requires efficient quality control procedures. The standard r-TLC method for verifying [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-EDOTREOTIDE (Somakit-TOC®) radiochemical purity (RCP) is time-consuming, creating workflow challenges in radiopharmacies. This study evaluates an optimized r-TLC method with a reduced migration distance (4 cm vs. 9 cm) to improve efficiency while maintaining analytical reliability. Tests for specificity, accuracy and robustness were performed using ITLC-SG – Acetate and ITLC-SG – Citrate systems. Additionally, migration time was analyzed to evaluate whether the alternative method could offer added benefits.

Results

The mean Rs for ITLC-SG – Acetate at 4 cm was 2.43 ± 0.28, while for ITLC-SG – Citrate with added [⁶⁸Ga]GaCl₃ was 5.58 ± 0.23, both exceeding the threshold of 1.5. The mean RCP at 4 cm was 98.90% ± 0.25%, and 99.21% ± 0.19% at 9 cm, with [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-uncomplexed remaining within acceptable limits. No [⁶⁸Ga]GaCl₃ was detected. The coefficient of variation (CV) for RCP between methods was < 2% (0.22%). Operator-based analysis yielded a mean Rs of 3.95 ± 0.06 (CV = 1.52%) and a mean [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-EDOTREOTIDE percentage of 99.60% ± 0.03% (CV = 0.03%). Migration times were significantly reduced with the alternative method (85% reduction).

Conclusion

Shortening the migration distance in r-TLC did not compromise specificity, accuracy or robustness while significantly reducing analysis time. The proposed method enhances PET radiopharmaceutical workflows, allowing faster patient dose preparation without quality loss. This approach could be investigated to other [68Ga]Ga-labeled compounds, supporting improved clinical and research applications in nuclear medicine.

[68Ga]Ga-EDOTREOTIDE (Somakit-TOC®)放射化学纯度评估优化:缩短r-TLC方法改进PET放射制药工作流程
[⁶⁸Ga]基于Ga的放射性药物在PET成像中的使用越来越多,需要有效的质量控制程序。用于验证[⁶⁸Ga]Ga- edotreotide (Somakit-TOC®)放射化学纯度(RCP)的标准r-TLC方法非常耗时,给放射性制药行业的工作流程带来了挑战。本研究评估了一种优化的r-TLC方法,该方法减少了迁移距离(4 cm vs. 9 cm),以提高效率,同时保持分析可靠性。采用ITLC-SG - Acetate和ITLC-SG - Citrate体系进行特异性、准确性和稳健性测试。此外,还分析了迁移时间,以评估替代方法是否可以提供额外的好处。结果ITLC-SG - Acetate在4 cm处的平均Rs为2.43±0.28,添加[⁶⁸Ga]GaCl₃的ITLC-SG - Citrate在4 cm处的平均Rs为5.58±0.23,均超过1.5的阈值。在4 cm处的平均RCP为98.90%±0.25%,在9 cm处的平均RCP为99.21%±0.19%,[⁶⁸Ga]Ga- un络合物均在可接受范围内。未检出[⁶⁸Ga]GaCl₃。方法间RCP的变异系数(CV)为2%(0.22%)。基于算子分析的平均Rs为3.95±0.06 (CV = 1.52%),平均[⁶⁸Ga]Ga- edotreotide百分比为99.60%±0.03% (CV = 0.03%)。替代方法显著减少迁移时间(减少85%)。结论缩短r-TLC迁移距离不影响特异性、准确性和鲁棒性,但显著缩短了分析时间。所提出的方法增强了PET放射性药物工作流程,允许更快的患者剂量制备而不损失质量。该方法可用于其他[68Ga] ga标记化合物的研究,支持改进核医学的临床和研究应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
30
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信