Default mode network synchrony reflects shared understanding

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Tal Ohad , Yohay Zvi , Yaara Yeshurun
{"title":"Default mode network synchrony reflects shared understanding","authors":"Tal Ohad ,&nbsp;Yohay Zvi ,&nbsp;Yaara Yeshurun","doi":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The default mode network (DMN) has been linked to self-reflection and theory of mind, suggesting that it facilitates understanding others by reflecting on ourselves. This raises the question of whether shared (synchronized) DMN responses are associated with mutual understanding. The current paper reviews studies on DMN synchronization during shared understanding of external events, regarding experimentally manipulated states (with presentation of external contexts), inherent traits (e.g. paranoia), interpersonal closeness (e.g. friends), and group identity (e.g. political affiliation). It also reviews DMN synchronization in shared understanding of interpersonal events, as in communication (e.g. teachers and students). We propose four research directions: investigating the role of DMN synchronization in simulating others’ mental states, testing if DMN synchronization is a trait, exploring its causal role in shared understanding, and testing coupling beyond synchronization. Advancing knowledge on DMN synchronization could answer fundamental questions about shared understanding and foster positive interactions among individuals and groups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56191,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","volume":"64 ","pages":"Article 101540"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352154625000592","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The default mode network (DMN) has been linked to self-reflection and theory of mind, suggesting that it facilitates understanding others by reflecting on ourselves. This raises the question of whether shared (synchronized) DMN responses are associated with mutual understanding. The current paper reviews studies on DMN synchronization during shared understanding of external events, regarding experimentally manipulated states (with presentation of external contexts), inherent traits (e.g. paranoia), interpersonal closeness (e.g. friends), and group identity (e.g. political affiliation). It also reviews DMN synchronization in shared understanding of interpersonal events, as in communication (e.g. teachers and students). We propose four research directions: investigating the role of DMN synchronization in simulating others’ mental states, testing if DMN synchronization is a trait, exploring its causal role in shared understanding, and testing coupling beyond synchronization. Advancing knowledge on DMN synchronization could answer fundamental questions about shared understanding and foster positive interactions among individuals and groups.
默认模式网络同步反映了共享的理解
默认模式网络(DMN)与自我反思和心智理论有关,表明它通过反思自己来促进理解他人。这就提出了一个问题,即共享(同步)DMN反应是否与相互理解有关。本文综述了在外部事件的共同理解过程中DMN同步的研究,包括实验操纵状态(具有外部上下文的呈现)、固有特征(如偏执)、人际关系亲密(如朋友)和群体认同(如政治派别)。它还回顾了对人际事件的共同理解中的DMN同步,如在交流中(例如教师和学生)。我们提出了四个研究方向:研究DMN同步性在模拟他人心理状态中的作用、测试DMN同步性是否为一种特质、探索其在共享理解中的因果作用以及测试同步性之外的耦合。推进DMN同步的知识可以回答关于共享理解的基本问题,并促进个人和群体之间的积极互动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences Neuroscience-Cognitive Neuroscience
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
2.00%
发文量
135
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences is a systematic, integrative review journal that provides a unique and educational platform for updates on the expanding volume of information published in the field of behavioral sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信