Bayesian inference-based stochastic group priorities acceptability analysis for group decision making with triangular fuzzy preference relations

IF 8.1 1区 计算机科学 0 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Jinpei Liu , Wenqian Wei , Longlong Shao , Shijuan Yang , Ligang Zhou , Feifei Jin
{"title":"Bayesian inference-based stochastic group priorities acceptability analysis for group decision making with triangular fuzzy preference relations","authors":"Jinpei Liu ,&nbsp;Wenqian Wei ,&nbsp;Longlong Shao ,&nbsp;Shijuan Yang ,&nbsp;Ligang Zhou ,&nbsp;Feifei Jin","doi":"10.1016/j.ins.2025.122287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Triangular fuzzy preference relation (TFPR) is one of the most prevalent tools utilized by decision-makers to express opinions in group decision making (GDM). However, many existing GDM methods with TFPRs not only result in information distortion caused by consistency adjustment but also lead to significant information loss during the integration process. To address these issues, this paper proposes a unique GDM method based on Bayesian inference and stochastic group priorities acceptability analysis, which samples fuzzy preference relations (FPRs) and expert weights using stochastic simulation techniques, and applies the Bayesian inference algorithm to obtain the posterior distribution of group priority vector. First, we establish an additive regression model for a given FPR, and present Bayesian inference algorithms to derive the posterior distribution of priority vector. For GDM with TFPRs, the Bayesian inference-based stochastic group priorities acceptability analysis method, which takes into account the inherent uncertainty in fuzzy preference information, is proposed to obtain the optimal ranking of all alternatives. Additionally, a new framework is constructed to facilitate the computation of descriptive measurements, thereby significantly enhancing the capacity to obtain the optimal ranking. Finally, numerical examples and comparative analysis are employed to demonstrate the applicability and benefits of our proposed method.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51063,"journal":{"name":"Information Sciences","volume":"717 ","pages":"Article 122287"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020025525004190","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Triangular fuzzy preference relation (TFPR) is one of the most prevalent tools utilized by decision-makers to express opinions in group decision making (GDM). However, many existing GDM methods with TFPRs not only result in information distortion caused by consistency adjustment but also lead to significant information loss during the integration process. To address these issues, this paper proposes a unique GDM method based on Bayesian inference and stochastic group priorities acceptability analysis, which samples fuzzy preference relations (FPRs) and expert weights using stochastic simulation techniques, and applies the Bayesian inference algorithm to obtain the posterior distribution of group priority vector. First, we establish an additive regression model for a given FPR, and present Bayesian inference algorithms to derive the posterior distribution of priority vector. For GDM with TFPRs, the Bayesian inference-based stochastic group priorities acceptability analysis method, which takes into account the inherent uncertainty in fuzzy preference information, is proposed to obtain the optimal ranking of all alternatives. Additionally, a new framework is constructed to facilitate the computation of descriptive measurements, thereby significantly enhancing the capacity to obtain the optimal ranking. Finally, numerical examples and comparative analysis are employed to demonstrate the applicability and benefits of our proposed method.
基于贝叶斯推理的三角模糊偏好关系群体决策的随机群体优先可接受性分析
三角模糊偏好关系(TFPR)是群体决策中决策者表达意见最常用的工具之一。然而,现有的许多带tfpr的GDM方法不仅会导致一致性调整引起的信息失真,而且在集成过程中还会造成严重的信息丢失。针对这些问题,本文提出了一种独特的基于贝叶斯推理和随机群体优先度可接受性分析的GDM方法,该方法利用随机模拟技术对模糊偏好关系(fpr)和专家权重进行抽样,并应用贝叶斯推理算法获得群体优先度向量的后验分布。首先,我们建立了给定FPR的加性回归模型,并给出了贝叶斯推理算法来推导优先向量的后验分布。针对带tfpr的GDM,考虑模糊偏好信息固有的不确定性,提出了基于贝叶斯推理的随机群体优先级可接受性分析方法,以获得各方案的最优排序。此外,构建了一个新的框架来简化描述性度量的计算,从而大大提高了获得最优排名的能力。最后,通过数值算例和对比分析验证了所提方法的适用性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Information Sciences
Information Sciences 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
17.30%
发文量
1322
审稿时长
10.4 months
期刊介绍: Informatics and Computer Science Intelligent Systems Applications is an esteemed international journal that focuses on publishing original and creative research findings in the field of information sciences. We also feature a limited number of timely tutorial and surveying contributions. Our journal aims to cater to a diverse audience, including researchers, developers, managers, strategic planners, graduate students, and anyone interested in staying up-to-date with cutting-edge research in information science, knowledge engineering, and intelligent systems. While readers are expected to share a common interest in information science, they come from varying backgrounds such as engineering, mathematics, statistics, physics, computer science, cell biology, molecular biology, management science, cognitive science, neurobiology, behavioral sciences, and biochemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信