Using deep learning to predict postoperative pain in reverse shoulder arthroplasty patients

Q2 Medicine
Tim Schneller MSc , Andrea Cina MSc , Philipp Moroder MD , Markus Scheibel MD ∗ , Asimina Lazaridou PhD ∗
{"title":"Using deep learning to predict postoperative pain in reverse shoulder arthroplasty patients","authors":"Tim Schneller MSc ,&nbsp;Andrea Cina MSc ,&nbsp;Philipp Moroder MD ,&nbsp;Markus Scheibel MD ∗ ,&nbsp;Asimina Lazaridou PhD ∗","doi":"10.1016/j.jseint.2024.11.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Most research on shoulder arthroplasty has predominantly concentrated on optimizing treatment to enhance shoulder function with comparatively less emphasis on postsurgical pain. Yet, pain is an equally significant or even more important outcome in orthopedic surgery. The aim of this study was to develop a deep learning algorithm for predicting postsurgical pain after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Clinical data of rTSA patients were extracted from a local shoulder arthroplasty registry and used to build an artificial neural network, which was set up with input from 34 preoperative features including demographics, disease-related information, clinical, and self-report assessments. The target variable was a binary classification derived from a numeric pain rating scale (0-10): if the pain scored 3 or higher, it was classified as positive; if the pain score was 2 or lower, it was classified as negative. The model was internally validated with a test dataset that was comprised of 20% of the whole dataset. Model performance was evaluated on the testset using the metrics accuracy, precision, recall, and f1-score.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Our model, including data from 1707 patients (pain: n = 705, no pain: n = 1002), achieved a 63% accuracy rate in predicting postsurgical pain 2 years following rTSA. Identification of the most critical factors indicating low postsurgical pain was performed by SHapley Additive exPlanations analysis, which included a low American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, a low Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire score, private insurance status, primary OA, being admitted due to illness as opposed to due to an accident, low pain levels, occasional alcohol consumption, low shoulder pain and disability index and functional scores.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>We successfully developed an artificial neural network to predict postsurgical pain after rTSA. Additional efforts are still required to refine the models’ performance, such as including further parameters predictive of pain and considering other machine learning algorithms. In a clinical setting, the implementation of such a prediction model could optimize surgical indications and help manage patient expectations more effectively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34444,"journal":{"name":"JSES International","volume":"9 3","pages":"Pages 748-755"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSES International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638324004833","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Most research on shoulder arthroplasty has predominantly concentrated on optimizing treatment to enhance shoulder function with comparatively less emphasis on postsurgical pain. Yet, pain is an equally significant or even more important outcome in orthopedic surgery. The aim of this study was to develop a deep learning algorithm for predicting postsurgical pain after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA).

Methods

Clinical data of rTSA patients were extracted from a local shoulder arthroplasty registry and used to build an artificial neural network, which was set up with input from 34 preoperative features including demographics, disease-related information, clinical, and self-report assessments. The target variable was a binary classification derived from a numeric pain rating scale (0-10): if the pain scored 3 or higher, it was classified as positive; if the pain score was 2 or lower, it was classified as negative. The model was internally validated with a test dataset that was comprised of 20% of the whole dataset. Model performance was evaluated on the testset using the metrics accuracy, precision, recall, and f1-score.

Results

Our model, including data from 1707 patients (pain: n = 705, no pain: n = 1002), achieved a 63% accuracy rate in predicting postsurgical pain 2 years following rTSA. Identification of the most critical factors indicating low postsurgical pain was performed by SHapley Additive exPlanations analysis, which included a low American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, a low Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire score, private insurance status, primary OA, being admitted due to illness as opposed to due to an accident, low pain levels, occasional alcohol consumption, low shoulder pain and disability index and functional scores.

Conclusion

We successfully developed an artificial neural network to predict postsurgical pain after rTSA. Additional efforts are still required to refine the models’ performance, such as including further parameters predictive of pain and considering other machine learning algorithms. In a clinical setting, the implementation of such a prediction model could optimize surgical indications and help manage patient expectations more effectively.
应用深度学习预测肩关节置换术患者术后疼痛
大多数关于肩关节置换术的研究主要集中在优化治疗以增强肩关节功能,而对术后疼痛的关注相对较少。然而,在骨科手术中,疼痛是一个同样重要甚至更重要的结果。本研究的目的是开发一种深度学习算法来预测逆行全肩关节置换术(rTSA)术后疼痛。方法从当地肩关节置换术登记中提取rTSA患者的临床数据,并使用34个术前特征(包括人口统计学、疾病相关信息、临床和自我报告评估)构建人工神经网络。目标变量是由数字疼痛评定量表(0-10)得出的二元分类:如果疼痛得分为3分或更高,则被归类为阳性;如果疼痛评分为2分或更低,则归类为阴性。该模型使用由整个数据集的20%组成的测试数据集进行内部验证。模型性能在测试集上使用指标准确性、精密度、召回率和f1-score进行评估。结果我们的模型包括来自1707例患者(疼痛:n = 705,无疼痛:n = 1002)的数据,在预测rTSA术后2年疼痛方面的准确率达到63%。通过SHapley加性解释分析来确定表明术后疼痛程度较低的最关键因素,包括美国麻醉医师协会的身体状况分类较低,手臂、肩膀和手的快速残疾问卷得分较低,私人保险状况,原发性OA,因疾病而不是因事故而入院,低疼痛水平,偶尔饮酒,低肩痛,残疾指数和功能评分。结论成功建立了人工神经网络预测rTSA术后疼痛的方法。还需要进一步的努力来完善模型的性能,例如包括更多的预测疼痛的参数,并考虑其他机器学习算法。在临床环境中,这种预测模型的实施可以优化手术指征,帮助更有效地管理患者的期望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JSES International
JSES International Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信