Older age and diabetes mellitus are negative prognostic factors for shoulder manipulation under ultrasound-guided cervical nerve root block for frozen shoulder: a retrospective cohort study

Q2 Medicine
Ryosuke Takahashi MD , Ryosuke Sagami MD , Yohei Harada MD, PhD , Yukihiro Kajita MD, PhD
{"title":"Older age and diabetes mellitus are negative prognostic factors for shoulder manipulation under ultrasound-guided cervical nerve root block for frozen shoulder: a retrospective cohort study","authors":"Ryosuke Takahashi MD ,&nbsp;Ryosuke Sagami MD ,&nbsp;Yohei Harada MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Yukihiro Kajita MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jseint.2024.11.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Manipulation under ultrasound-guided cervical nerve root block (MUC) for frozen shoulder has successful clinical outcomes; however, some cases remain refractory. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the outcomes of MUC for frozen shoulder.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively reviewed 126 frozen shoulders in 113 patients who underwent MUC. We defined frozen shoulder as a limited shoulder range of motion (ROM) (passive forward flexion &lt;120°, external rotation &lt;30°, or internal rotation lower than L3). Patients who fulfilled any one of the criteria were considered to have frozen shoulder. The refractory group included patients who fulfilled any of the criteria for frozen shoulder at 12 months after MUC; those in the success group fulfilled none of the criteria. The ROM, Constant Shoulder score, and University of California, Los Angeles score were evaluated before and 12 months after MUC. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twelve months after MUC, both the success (n = 112 frozen shoulders in 100 patients) and refractory groups (n = 14 frozen shoulders in 13 patients) showed significantly improved ROM and functional scores. Although the groups did not differ significantly before MUC, the refractory group showed significantly inferior outcomes to the success group at 12 months after MUC. Age and the presence of diabetes mellitus (DM) were significantly higher in the refractory group than in the success group. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed older age and the presence of DM as independent risk factors for refractory clinical outcomes. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the cutoff value of age for refractory of MUC was 56 years.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Older age and the presence of DM are negative prognostic factors for MUC in frozen shoulder. This result may be useful when counseling patients with these conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34444,"journal":{"name":"JSES International","volume":"9 3","pages":"Pages 672-677"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSES International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638324004948","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Manipulation under ultrasound-guided cervical nerve root block (MUC) for frozen shoulder has successful clinical outcomes; however, some cases remain refractory. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the outcomes of MUC for frozen shoulder.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 126 frozen shoulders in 113 patients who underwent MUC. We defined frozen shoulder as a limited shoulder range of motion (ROM) (passive forward flexion <120°, external rotation <30°, or internal rotation lower than L3). Patients who fulfilled any one of the criteria were considered to have frozen shoulder. The refractory group included patients who fulfilled any of the criteria for frozen shoulder at 12 months after MUC; those in the success group fulfilled none of the criteria. The ROM, Constant Shoulder score, and University of California, Los Angeles score were evaluated before and 12 months after MUC. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors.

Results

Twelve months after MUC, both the success (n = 112 frozen shoulders in 100 patients) and refractory groups (n = 14 frozen shoulders in 13 patients) showed significantly improved ROM and functional scores. Although the groups did not differ significantly before MUC, the refractory group showed significantly inferior outcomes to the success group at 12 months after MUC. Age and the presence of diabetes mellitus (DM) were significantly higher in the refractory group than in the success group. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed older age and the presence of DM as independent risk factors for refractory clinical outcomes. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the cutoff value of age for refractory of MUC was 56 years.

Conclusion

Older age and the presence of DM are negative prognostic factors for MUC in frozen shoulder. This result may be useful when counseling patients with these conditions.
年龄和糖尿病是超声引导颈神经根阻滞治疗肩关节冷冻肩关节的不良预后因素:一项回顾性队列研究
超声引导下颈神经根阻滞(MUC)治疗肩周炎具有成功的临床效果;然而,有些病例仍然难治性。因此,我们的目的是研究MUC治疗肩周炎的结果。方法回顾性分析113例MUC患者的126例肩周炎。我们将冻肩关节定义为肩关节活动范围有限(被动前屈120°,外旋30°,或内旋低于L3)。满足任何一个标准的患者被认为患有肩周炎。顽固性组包括在MUC术后12个月满足任何冻疮标准的患者;成功组的人没有达到任何标准。在MUC前和MUC后12个月评估ROM、Constant Shoulder评分和加州大学洛杉矶分校评分。采用多元logistic回归分析确定危险因素。结果MUC术后12个月,成功组(100例患者中n = 112例肩关节)和难治组(13例患者中n = 14例肩关节)的ROM和功能评分均有显著改善。尽管两组在MUC前无显著差异,但在MUC后12个月,难治组的预后明显低于成功组。难治性组患者的年龄和糖尿病发生率明显高于成功组。多元logistic回归分析显示,年龄和糖尿病的存在是难治性临床结果的独立危险因素。患者工作特征曲线分析表明,MUC难治性患者的年龄临界值为56岁。结论年龄和糖尿病是冻结肩MUC的不良预后因素。这一结果在为患有这些疾病的患者提供咨询时可能是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JSES International
JSES International Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信