Strategic conflicts in the aviation industry: Evolution and impact analysis using Graph Model with application to airspace conflict between European Countries and Russia

Shawei He , Changmin Jiang
{"title":"Strategic conflicts in the aviation industry: Evolution and impact analysis using Graph Model with application to airspace conflict between European Countries and Russia","authors":"Shawei He ,&nbsp;Changmin Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.team.2025.04.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this paper, a general framework of analyzing strategic conflicts in aviation industry is proposed based on Graph Model for Conflict Resolution (GMCR). The ongoing conflict regarding the mutual closure of airspace between Russia and the European countries (EUC) and the nationalization of leased aircrafts by Russia are investigated using GMCR for the first time. Outcomes at five possible scenarios are analyzed by calculating the equilibria in which decision makers (DM) behave with different preferences, or with new choice of actions. The evolution analysis is further carried out at each scenario to demonstrate how the conflict could evolve from the starting state to the calculated equilibria. Amidst the ongoing military conflict, it can be suggested whether the conflicts regarding the airspace closure and the nationalization of aircraft can be solved at various scenarios and under what conditions, through convenient modeling and rigorous computation. The calculation result indicates that negotiation could help solve the conflict, while sanctions along could not force Russia to reopen its airspace. This research can provide an enhanced understanding of the conflict regarding airspace sanctions between Russia and the EUC and the guidance of actions for concerned decision makers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101258,"journal":{"name":"Transport Economics and Management","volume":"3 ","pages":"Pages 199-213"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Economics and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949899625000139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, a general framework of analyzing strategic conflicts in aviation industry is proposed based on Graph Model for Conflict Resolution (GMCR). The ongoing conflict regarding the mutual closure of airspace between Russia and the European countries (EUC) and the nationalization of leased aircrafts by Russia are investigated using GMCR for the first time. Outcomes at five possible scenarios are analyzed by calculating the equilibria in which decision makers (DM) behave with different preferences, or with new choice of actions. The evolution analysis is further carried out at each scenario to demonstrate how the conflict could evolve from the starting state to the calculated equilibria. Amidst the ongoing military conflict, it can be suggested whether the conflicts regarding the airspace closure and the nationalization of aircraft can be solved at various scenarios and under what conditions, through convenient modeling and rigorous computation. The calculation result indicates that negotiation could help solve the conflict, while sanctions along could not force Russia to reopen its airspace. This research can provide an enhanced understanding of the conflict regarding airspace sanctions between Russia and the EUC and the guidance of actions for concerned decision makers.
航空工业中的战略冲突:基于图模型的演变与影响分析——以欧洲国家与俄罗斯空域冲突为例
本文基于冲突解决图模型(GMCR),提出了分析航空业战略冲突的一般框架。围绕俄罗斯与欧洲国家(EUC)之间相互关闭领空的矛盾和俄罗斯租赁飞机的国有化问题,首次利用GMCR进行了调查。通过计算决策者(DM)以不同偏好或新的行动选择行为的均衡,分析了五种可能情况下的结果。在每个场景中进一步进行演化分析,以演示冲突如何从初始状态演化到计算的平衡状态。在持续的军事冲突中,通过方便的建模和严格的计算,可以提出在各种场景下是否可以解决空域关闭和飞机国有化的冲突,以及在什么条件下可以解决。计算结果表明,谈判可能有助于解决冲突,而制裁本身无法迫使俄罗斯重新开放其领空。本研究可以加深对俄罗斯与欧盟空域制裁冲突的理解,并为相关决策者提供行动指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信