Validation Study on Iatrogenic Nerve Damage Reduction Using Augmented Reality on Elbow Phantom

Giacomo Riberi MD , Antonio Cangelosi MSc , Paolo Titolo MD , Elisa Dutto MD , Massimo Salvi PhD , Filippo Molinari PhD , Luca Ulrich PhD , Marco Agus PhD , Corrado Calì PhD
{"title":"Validation Study on Iatrogenic Nerve Damage Reduction Using Augmented Reality on Elbow Phantom","authors":"Giacomo Riberi MD ,&nbsp;Antonio Cangelosi MSc ,&nbsp;Paolo Titolo MD ,&nbsp;Elisa Dutto MD ,&nbsp;Massimo Salvi PhD ,&nbsp;Filippo Molinari PhD ,&nbsp;Luca Ulrich PhD ,&nbsp;Marco Agus PhD ,&nbsp;Corrado Calì PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.mcpdig.2025.100221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To compare augmented reality (AR) and classical intraoperative C-arm surgical navigation and evaluate whether head-mounted display improves surgical accuracy in the placement of a rod-like object, such as K-wire, using an anatomically accurate elbow phantom.</div></div><div><h3>Participants and Methods</h3><div>Data were collected between January 10, 2024, and March 15, 2024. We developed an AR system, X-ray simulation system and surgical phantom to test K-wire placement in 3 locations of the distal humerus and proximal ulnar bones. An initial phase with only X-ray as guidance was performed as case control; in later phases, the candidates were allowed to also use the head-mounted display. The evaluation parameters were time, placement angle, number of X-ray images taken, number of attempts, and distance from anatomical structures.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 19 physicians participated in the study. We analyzed 193 K-wire placements attempts that resulted in 150 estimated correct positions. This reflects a real-world scenario where multiple placements might be attempted to correctly place a K-wire. Compared with standard procedure, the use of AR resulted in −53.8 seconds in K-wire placement time, −47% of angular error from the K-wire target, −80% X-ray images taken to reach the estimate correct position, and decrease in distance variability of −81%, of the K-wire from anatomical structures of interest.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Compared with C-arm, AR navigation improved time, and angle of placement, requiring less X-ray images.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74127,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health","volume":"3 2","pages":"Article 100221"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949761225000288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To compare augmented reality (AR) and classical intraoperative C-arm surgical navigation and evaluate whether head-mounted display improves surgical accuracy in the placement of a rod-like object, such as K-wire, using an anatomically accurate elbow phantom.

Participants and Methods

Data were collected between January 10, 2024, and March 15, 2024. We developed an AR system, X-ray simulation system and surgical phantom to test K-wire placement in 3 locations of the distal humerus and proximal ulnar bones. An initial phase with only X-ray as guidance was performed as case control; in later phases, the candidates were allowed to also use the head-mounted display. The evaluation parameters were time, placement angle, number of X-ray images taken, number of attempts, and distance from anatomical structures.

Results

In total, 19 physicians participated in the study. We analyzed 193 K-wire placements attempts that resulted in 150 estimated correct positions. This reflects a real-world scenario where multiple placements might be attempted to correctly place a K-wire. Compared with standard procedure, the use of AR resulted in −53.8 seconds in K-wire placement time, −47% of angular error from the K-wire target, −80% X-ray images taken to reach the estimate correct position, and decrease in distance variability of −81%, of the K-wire from anatomical structures of interest.

Conclusions

Compared with C-arm, AR navigation improved time, and angle of placement, requiring less X-ray images.
增强现实技术在医源性神经损伤修复中的应用研究
目的比较增强现实(AR)与传统的术中c臂手术导航,并评估头戴式显示器是否能提高手术准确性,使用解剖学上准确的肘关节假体放置棒状物体(如k线)。参与者和方法数据收集于2024年1月10日至2024年3月15日。我们开发了AR系统、x射线模拟系统和手术假体来测试在肱骨远端和尺骨近端3个位置放置k -丝。初始阶段仅以x射线为指导,作为病例控制;在后期阶段,候选人也被允许使用头戴式显示器。评价参数为时间、放置角度、x线影像拍摄次数、尝试次数、距离解剖结构的距离。结果共19名医生参与研究。我们分析了193次k线放置尝试,产生了150个估计正确的位置。这反映了一个现实世界的场景,在这个场景中,可能会尝试多种位置来正确放置k线。与标准方法相比,AR的使用导致k线放置时间缩短- 53.8秒,k线目标的角度误差减少- 47%,达到估计正确位置的x射线图像减少- 80%,k线与感兴趣解剖结构的距离变化减少- 81%。结论与c臂相比,AR导航缩短了放置时间,改善了放置角度,减少了x线图像需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health
Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health Medicine and Dentistry (General), Health Informatics, Public Health and Health Policy
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信