Alessandro Vai , Alfredo Mirandola , Vittoria Pavanello , Giuseppe Magro , Matteo Bagnalasta , Luca Trombetta , Anna Maria Camarda , Rossana Ingargiola , Sara Ronchi , Anna Cavallo , Marzia Franceschini , Andrea Riccardo Filippi , Nicola Alessandro Iacovelli , Mario Ciocca , Ester Orlandi
{"title":"Transmission beam planning for improved robustness and efficiency in proton therapy for head and neck cancer","authors":"Alessandro Vai , Alfredo Mirandola , Vittoria Pavanello , Giuseppe Magro , Matteo Bagnalasta , Luca Trombetta , Anna Maria Camarda , Rossana Ingargiola , Sara Ronchi , Anna Cavallo , Marzia Franceschini , Andrea Riccardo Filippi , Nicola Alessandro Iacovelli , Mario Ciocca , Ester Orlandi","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2025.100777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><div>Optimizing head and neck cancer (HNC) plans with single-energy proton beams that fully traverse the patient (transmission beams) can improve robustness and delivery efficiency, complementing conventional approaches.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>Experimental measurements, validated with Monte Carlo (MC) simulations, were carried out on a uniform water-equivalent plastic phantom (RW3) containing a metal component (2-Euro coins) irradiated with a single high energy proton field (228.6 MeV) to verify the transmission beam concept. 28 nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) were then optimized with nine coplanar single-energy fields (228.6 MeV), positioning the Bragg peaks well beyond the patient body, so called transmission beam mode. These plans (IMPT-TB) were compared to conventional IMPT and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) photon plans in terms of dose distributions quality, expected organ at risk (OAR) toxicity, robustness and delivery time.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Transmission beams minimized dose perturbation by metal objects (∼7% max relative variation at 18 cm depth). IMPT-TB plans achieved comparable dose distribution and expected toxicities to IMPT, increasing the dose bath (+96 % vs. IMPT) but remaining significantly lower than VMAT (−31.4 %). For 94 % of patients (N = 26), IMPT-TB met at least one additional dose constraint that the corresponding IMPT plan failed to satisfy. Moreover, in the analyzed subgroup (N = 5), IMPT-TB plans delivered with our synchrotron exhibit a 67 % reduction in beam time compared to IMPT plans.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>IMPT-TB plans demonstrated enhanced robustness and significantly faster delivery compared to IMPT. Transmission beams could be clinically implemented, also in conjunction with standard IMPT, for proton radiation treatment of NPC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":"34 ","pages":"Article 100777"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240563162500082X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and purpose
Optimizing head and neck cancer (HNC) plans with single-energy proton beams that fully traverse the patient (transmission beams) can improve robustness and delivery efficiency, complementing conventional approaches.
Materials and Methods
Experimental measurements, validated with Monte Carlo (MC) simulations, were carried out on a uniform water-equivalent plastic phantom (RW3) containing a metal component (2-Euro coins) irradiated with a single high energy proton field (228.6 MeV) to verify the transmission beam concept. 28 nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) were then optimized with nine coplanar single-energy fields (228.6 MeV), positioning the Bragg peaks well beyond the patient body, so called transmission beam mode. These plans (IMPT-TB) were compared to conventional IMPT and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) photon plans in terms of dose distributions quality, expected organ at risk (OAR) toxicity, robustness and delivery time.
Results
Transmission beams minimized dose perturbation by metal objects (∼7% max relative variation at 18 cm depth). IMPT-TB plans achieved comparable dose distribution and expected toxicities to IMPT, increasing the dose bath (+96 % vs. IMPT) but remaining significantly lower than VMAT (−31.4 %). For 94 % of patients (N = 26), IMPT-TB met at least one additional dose constraint that the corresponding IMPT plan failed to satisfy. Moreover, in the analyzed subgroup (N = 5), IMPT-TB plans delivered with our synchrotron exhibit a 67 % reduction in beam time compared to IMPT plans.
Conclusions
IMPT-TB plans demonstrated enhanced robustness and significantly faster delivery compared to IMPT. Transmission beams could be clinically implemented, also in conjunction with standard IMPT, for proton radiation treatment of NPC.