Writing in community: Relationship building and accountability in knowledge production

IF 2.6 1区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Jordi Armani Rivera Prince, Emily M. Blackwood, Madeleine Landrum, Emily B. P. Milton, Elizabeth L. Rodgers, Monica Barnes, Elizabeth Chin, Christa Craven, Kristina Douglass, María José Figuerero Torres, María A. Gutiérrez, Sarah Herr, Lisa Hodgetts, Kirk A. Maasch, Kylie E. Quave, Danilyn Rutherford, Daniel H. Sandweiss
{"title":"Writing in community: Relationship building and accountability in knowledge production","authors":"Jordi Armani Rivera Prince,&nbsp;Emily M. Blackwood,&nbsp;Madeleine Landrum,&nbsp;Emily B. P. Milton,&nbsp;Elizabeth L. Rodgers,&nbsp;Monica Barnes,&nbsp;Elizabeth Chin,&nbsp;Christa Craven,&nbsp;Kristina Douglass,&nbsp;María José Figuerero Torres,&nbsp;María A. Gutiérrez,&nbsp;Sarah Herr,&nbsp;Lisa Hodgetts,&nbsp;Kirk A. Maasch,&nbsp;Kylie E. Quave,&nbsp;Danilyn Rutherford,&nbsp;Daniel H. Sandweiss","doi":"10.1111/aman.28070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As anthropology reckons with its past, present, and future, anthropologists increasingly seek to challenge inequities within the discipline and academia more broadly. Anthropology, regardless of subdiscipline, is a social endeavor. Yet research often remains an isolating (though not necessarily solitary) process, even within research teams and in coauthorship contexts. Here, we focus on peer-reviewed publication as the principal manifestation of knowledge production and propose a method for challenging division, hierarchy, power differentials, and adherence to tradition: <i>writing in community</i>. Writing in community is a collaborative form of writing that centers care, abundance, joy, and personal satisfaction over the individuality currently rewarded by the academy. This process engenders consensus, circumvents normative hierarchical research and writing, and promotes relationship building. Here, we experiment by inviting reviewers and editors into our community to collectively contribute to the writing process and reflect on that experience together. Ultimately, we challenge norms for scholarship, (co)authorship, and ways of knowing to offer a more equitable praxis of knowledge production. We propose that writing in community can help anthropologists enact values of multivocality and research transparency.</p>","PeriodicalId":7697,"journal":{"name":"American Anthropologist","volume":"127 2","pages":"319-338"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aman.28070","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Anthropologist","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aman.28070","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As anthropology reckons with its past, present, and future, anthropologists increasingly seek to challenge inequities within the discipline and academia more broadly. Anthropology, regardless of subdiscipline, is a social endeavor. Yet research often remains an isolating (though not necessarily solitary) process, even within research teams and in coauthorship contexts. Here, we focus on peer-reviewed publication as the principal manifestation of knowledge production and propose a method for challenging division, hierarchy, power differentials, and adherence to tradition: writing in community. Writing in community is a collaborative form of writing that centers care, abundance, joy, and personal satisfaction over the individuality currently rewarded by the academy. This process engenders consensus, circumvents normative hierarchical research and writing, and promotes relationship building. Here, we experiment by inviting reviewers and editors into our community to collectively contribute to the writing process and reflect on that experience together. Ultimately, we challenge norms for scholarship, (co)authorship, and ways of knowing to offer a more equitable praxis of knowledge production. We propose that writing in community can help anthropologists enact values of multivocality and research transparency.

Abstract Image

社群写作:知识生产中的关系建立与责任
当人类学考虑它的过去、现在和未来时,人类学家越来越多地寻求挑战学科和学术界更广泛的不平等。人类学,不管是哪个分支学科,都是一项社会事业。然而,研究往往仍然是一个孤立的过程(尽管不一定是孤立的),即使在研究团队和合作的背景下也是如此。在这里,我们将重点放在同行评议出版作为知识生产的主要表现形式,并提出了一种挑战分工、等级、权力差异和对传统的坚持的方法:社区写作。社区写作是一种协作的写作形式,它将关怀、丰富、快乐和个人满足感集中在目前由学院奖励的个性之上。这个过程产生共识,绕过规范的等级研究和写作,并促进关系的建立。在这里,我们尝试邀请审稿人和编辑进入我们的社区,共同为写作过程做出贡献,并共同反思这一经历。最终,我们挑战学术、(共同)作者和知识方式的规范,以提供更公平的知识生产实践。我们提出社群写作可以帮助人类学家制定多元性和研究透明度的价值观。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Anthropologist
American Anthropologist ANTHROPOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
11.40%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: American Anthropologist is the flagship journal of the American Anthropological Association, reaching well over 12,000 readers with each issue. The journal advances the Association mission through publishing articles that add to, integrate, synthesize, and interpret anthropological knowledge; commentaries and essays on issues of importance to the discipline; and reviews of books, films, sound recordings and exhibits.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信