{"title":"Usefulness of Isosurface Geometric Measurement on Volume-Rendered Images for Quantitative Measurements of Complex Cardiac Anatomical Features","authors":"Kenichi Kamiya, Yukihiro Nagatani, Jun Matsubayashi, Ryo Uemura, Tatsuya Oki, Yuji Matsubayashi, Shinya Terada, Piers Vigers, Susumu Nakata, Yoshiyuki Watanabe, Tomoaki Suzuki","doi":"10.1155/jocs/5193639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Background:</b> Measuring living heart anatomy using three-dimensional (3D) images remains challenging. To address this, a method called isosurface measurement on volume-rendered images (IMVR) has been developed. This study aims to validate IMVR in quantitative measurement by comparing it with curved planar reformation (CPR).</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> Five 3D-printed human cardiac models created from computed tomography (CT) images were optically scanned, and selected features were measured for reference. The models were CT-scanned, and the datasets were processed for IMVR and CPR measurements. Overall, 157 anatomical features (105 in the aortic root, 52 in the coronary artery) were measured three times by two observers for each method, and the agreement with the reference values was assessed using the Bland–Altman analysis.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> In the aortic root measurement, the lower and upper 95% limits of agreement (LOAs, mm) for IMVR were (−3.1, 2.4) and (−1.3, 0.9), whereas those for CPR were (−5.9, 5.2) and (−5.9, 6.3). In the coronary artery measurement, the LOAs for IMVR were (−2.6, 2.2) and (−1.2, 0.8), while those for CPR were (−9.2, 8.6) and (−9.5, 8.5). For both methods, the intraclass coefficient indicated high intra- and interobserver reliability.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusion:</b> IMVR demonstrated greater precision than CPR and facilitated 3D measurements of complex cardiovascular features.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15367,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Surgery","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/jocs/5193639","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiac Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/jocs/5193639","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Measuring living heart anatomy using three-dimensional (3D) images remains challenging. To address this, a method called isosurface measurement on volume-rendered images (IMVR) has been developed. This study aims to validate IMVR in quantitative measurement by comparing it with curved planar reformation (CPR).
Methods: Five 3D-printed human cardiac models created from computed tomography (CT) images were optically scanned, and selected features were measured for reference. The models were CT-scanned, and the datasets were processed for IMVR and CPR measurements. Overall, 157 anatomical features (105 in the aortic root, 52 in the coronary artery) were measured three times by two observers for each method, and the agreement with the reference values was assessed using the Bland–Altman analysis.
Results: In the aortic root measurement, the lower and upper 95% limits of agreement (LOAs, mm) for IMVR were (−3.1, 2.4) and (−1.3, 0.9), whereas those for CPR were (−5.9, 5.2) and (−5.9, 6.3). In the coronary artery measurement, the LOAs for IMVR were (−2.6, 2.2) and (−1.2, 0.8), while those for CPR were (−9.2, 8.6) and (−9.5, 8.5). For both methods, the intraclass coefficient indicated high intra- and interobserver reliability.
Conclusion: IMVR demonstrated greater precision than CPR and facilitated 3D measurements of complex cardiovascular features.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Cardiac Surgery (JCS) is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to contemporary surgical treatment of cardiac disease. Renown for its detailed "how to" methods, JCS''s well-illustrated, concise technical articles, critical reviews and commentaries are highly valued by dedicated readers worldwide.
With Editor-in-Chief Harold Lazar, MD and an internationally prominent editorial board, JCS continues its 20-year history as an important professional resource. Editorial coverage includes biologic support, mechanical cardiac assist and/or replacement and surgical techniques, and features current material on topics such as OPCAB surgery, stented and stentless valves, endovascular stent placement, atrial fibrillation, transplantation, percutaneous valve repair/replacement, left ventricular restoration surgery, immunobiology, and bridges to transplant and recovery.
In addition, special sections (Images in Cardiac Surgery, Cardiac Regeneration) and historical reviews stimulate reader interest. The journal also routinely publishes proceedings of important international symposia in a timely manner.