Entanglement Routing and Bottlenecks in Grid Networks

IF 2.5 4区 物理与天体物理 Q2 PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Vaisakh Mannalath, Anirban Pathak
{"title":"Entanglement Routing and Bottlenecks in Grid Networks","authors":"Vaisakh Mannalath,&nbsp;Anirban Pathak","doi":"10.1002/andp.202400316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Distributing entangled states among users is a fundamental problem in quantum networks. Existing protocols like <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mi>X</mi>\n <annotation>$X$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> protocol introduced in [<i>npj Quantum Inf. 2019, 5, 76</i>] use graph theoretic tools like local complementation to optimize the number of measurements required to extract any Bell pair among the network users. Such a protocol relies on finding the shortest path between the users. Here, it is established that, in general, the most optimal path to perform the <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mi>X</mi>\n <annotation>$X$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> protocol is not along the shortest path. Specific examples of this advantage are provided on networks of size as small as 12 qubits. Bottlenecks in establishing simultaneous Bell pairs in nearest-neighbor architectures are also explored. Recent results suggesting the unsuitability of the line and ring networks for the implementation of quantum networks due to the bottlenecks are revisited, and using local equivalency relations from graph theory, it's hinted that even grid graphs are not exempted from bottleneck issues. Finally, bottlenecks are simulated in grid graphs of sizes up to <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mn>6</mn>\n <mo>×</mo>\n <mn>6</mn>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$6 \\times 6$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>. Analysis reveals relative positions within a grid graph that are more susceptible to bottlenecks. It demonstrates the superiority of the <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mi>X</mi>\n <annotation>$X$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> protocol along paths that are not shortest paths while avoiding bottlenecks for simultaneous communication requests.</p>","PeriodicalId":7896,"journal":{"name":"Annalen der Physik","volume":"537 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annalen der Physik","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/andp.202400316","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Distributing entangled states among users is a fundamental problem in quantum networks. Existing protocols like X $X$ protocol introduced in [npj Quantum Inf. 2019, 5, 76] use graph theoretic tools like local complementation to optimize the number of measurements required to extract any Bell pair among the network users. Such a protocol relies on finding the shortest path between the users. Here, it is established that, in general, the most optimal path to perform the X $X$ protocol is not along the shortest path. Specific examples of this advantage are provided on networks of size as small as 12 qubits. Bottlenecks in establishing simultaneous Bell pairs in nearest-neighbor architectures are also explored. Recent results suggesting the unsuitability of the line and ring networks for the implementation of quantum networks due to the bottlenecks are revisited, and using local equivalency relations from graph theory, it's hinted that even grid graphs are not exempted from bottleneck issues. Finally, bottlenecks are simulated in grid graphs of sizes up to 6 × 6 $6 \times 6$ . Analysis reveals relative positions within a grid graph that are more susceptible to bottlenecks. It demonstrates the superiority of the X $X$ protocol along paths that are not shortest paths while avoiding bottlenecks for simultaneous communication requests.

Abstract Image

网格网络中的纠缠路由和瓶颈
在用户之间分配纠缠态是量子网络中的一个基本问题。现有协议,如[npj Quantum Inf. 2019, 5,76]中引入的X$ X$协议,使用局部互补等图论工具来优化提取网络用户之间任何贝尔对所需的测量数量。这种协议依赖于找到用户之间的最短路径。在这里,可以确定的是,一般来说,执行X$ X$协议的最优路径并不沿着最短路径。这种优势的具体例子是在小到12量子位的网络上。本文还探讨了在最近邻结构中建立同步贝尔对的瓶颈。最近的研究结果表明,由于瓶颈,线和环网络不适合量子网络的实现,并利用图论的局部等价关系,暗示即使网格图也不能免于瓶颈问题。最后,瓶颈在大小为6 × 6$ 6 \ × 6$的网格图中模拟。分析揭示了网格图中更容易受到瓶颈影响的相对位置。它展示了X$ X$协议在非最短路径上的优越性,同时避免了同时通信请求的瓶颈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annalen der Physik
Annalen der Physik 物理-物理:综合
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
202
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Annalen der Physik (AdP) is one of the world''s most renowned physics journals with an over 225 years'' tradition of excellence. Based on the fame of seminal papers by Einstein, Planck and many others, the journal is now tuned towards today''s most exciting findings including the annual Nobel Lectures. AdP comprises all areas of physics, with particular emphasis on important, significant and highly relevant results. Topics range from fundamental research to forefront applications including dynamic and interdisciplinary fields. The journal covers theory, simulation and experiment, e.g., but not exclusively, in condensed matter, quantum physics, photonics, materials physics, high energy, gravitation and astrophysics. It welcomes Rapid Research Letters, Original Papers, Review and Feature Articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信