An inter-comparison between calculated solid angle for different geometrical correlations of source-detector through analytical and Monte Carlo approaches

IF 1.6 4区 物理与天体物理 Q2 PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Hamid Reza Baghani, Behzad Aminafshar
{"title":"An inter-comparison between calculated solid angle for different geometrical correlations of source-detector through analytical and Monte Carlo approaches","authors":"Hamid Reza Baghani,&nbsp;Behzad Aminafshar","doi":"10.1007/s12648-024-03453-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Calculation of solid angle (Ω) is of particular importance in radiation detection purposes. Nevertheless, determining the Ω value by analytical methods is a difficult procedure in complicated geometry conditions. The current study evaluates the capability of the Monte Carlo simulation approach in Ω calculation at different geometrical correlations between the source and detector by comparing the obtained results with those of the analytical method. Ω values were calculated for four different geometrical correlations between the source and detector (point and disk source/circular and rectangular detector apertures) through both analytical (Ω<sub>th</sub>) and Monte Carlo simulation (Ω<sub>sim</sub>) approaches. The MCNPX code was used for Monte Carlo-based calculations. For all studied geometrical correlations, a good agreement was observed between Ω<sub>th</sub> and Ω<sub>sim</sub> values such that the maximum difference between the results was less than 4%. A better accordance between Ω<sub>th</sub> and Ω<sub>sim</sub> was found for a point source in comparison with the disk source. Finally, it is concluded that Monte Carlo simulation can be considered a fast and reliable alternative to the analytical method in determining the solid angle for a radiation detector, especially in complicated geometry conditions, where applying the analytical approach may fail to result in an accurate Ω value.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":584,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Physics","volume":"99 6","pages":"2207 - 2215"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Physics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12648-024-03453-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Calculation of solid angle (Ω) is of particular importance in radiation detection purposes. Nevertheless, determining the Ω value by analytical methods is a difficult procedure in complicated geometry conditions. The current study evaluates the capability of the Monte Carlo simulation approach in Ω calculation at different geometrical correlations between the source and detector by comparing the obtained results with those of the analytical method. Ω values were calculated for four different geometrical correlations between the source and detector (point and disk source/circular and rectangular detector apertures) through both analytical (Ωth) and Monte Carlo simulation (Ωsim) approaches. The MCNPX code was used for Monte Carlo-based calculations. For all studied geometrical correlations, a good agreement was observed between Ωth and Ωsim values such that the maximum difference between the results was less than 4%. A better accordance between Ωth and Ωsim was found for a point source in comparison with the disk source. Finally, it is concluded that Monte Carlo simulation can be considered a fast and reliable alternative to the analytical method in determining the solid angle for a radiation detector, especially in complicated geometry conditions, where applying the analytical approach may fail to result in an accurate Ω value.

Abstract Image

用解析法和蒙特卡罗法比较了源探测器不同几何相关性计算的立体角
计算立体角(Ω)在辐射探测中特别重要。然而,在复杂的几何条件下,用解析方法确定Ω值是一个困难的过程。本研究通过将得到的结果与解析方法的结果进行比较,评估了蒙特卡罗模拟方法在Ω中计算源和探测器之间不同几何相关性的能力。通过解析(Ωth)和蒙特卡罗模拟(Ωsim)方法计算了源和探测器(点和盘源/圆形和矩形探测器孔径)之间四种不同几何相关性的Ω值。MCNPX代码用于基于蒙特卡罗的计算。对于所有研究的几何相关性,在Ωth和Ωsim值之间观察到很好的一致性,使得结果之间的最大差异小于4%。与磁盘源相比,点源在Ωth和Ωsim之间发现了更好的一致性。最后,得出结论,蒙特卡罗模拟可以被认为是一种快速可靠的替代解析方法来确定辐射探测器的立体角,特别是在复杂的几何条件下,应用解析方法可能无法得到准确的Ω值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Physics
Indian Journal of Physics 物理-物理:综合
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
275
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Physics is a monthly research journal in English published by the Indian Association for the Cultivation of Sciences in collaboration with the Indian Physical Society. The journal publishes refereed papers covering current research in Physics in the following category: Astrophysics, Atmospheric and Space physics; Atomic & Molecular Physics; Biophysics; Condensed Matter & Materials Physics; General & Interdisciplinary Physics; Nonlinear dynamics & Complex Systems; Nuclear Physics; Optics and Spectroscopy; Particle Physics; Plasma Physics; Relativity & Cosmology; Statistical Physics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信