Role of exposure in adoption and intensity of tree planting practices among smallholder households in Rwanda

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Hilda Kegode, Damien Jourdain, Tesfaye Woldeyohanes, Karl Hughes, Selma Tuemumunu Karuaihe
{"title":"Role of exposure in adoption and intensity of tree planting practices among smallholder households in Rwanda","authors":"Hilda Kegode,&nbsp;Damien Jourdain,&nbsp;Tesfaye Woldeyohanes,&nbsp;Karl Hughes,&nbsp;Selma Tuemumunu Karuaihe","doi":"10.1007/s10457-025-01197-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Agroforestry, widely promoted across Sub-Saharan Africa to restore degraded landscapes and improve livelihoods, has the potential to positively impact Sustainable Development Goals (SDG), specifically SDG15 (life on land) and contribute towards the achievement of SDG2 (food security) and other SDGs. However, despite substantial investment in agroforestry programs, evidence of program effectiveness in enhancing adoption is inadequate. This paper employed the augmented inverse probability weighting method to analyze the impact of exposure to agroforestry practices on the adoption and intensity of tree planting using panel household data from Eastern Rwanda. The findings show that exposure increased the probability of adoption by 7% (<i>p</i> = 0.03). A higher probability of adoption (15%, <i>p</i> = 0.01) was observed in households that were exposed both before and after the baseline period, suggesting cumulative effects of exposure over time. Exposure modestly enhanced the diversity of trees and the number of trees in cropping fields, but farmers tended to adopt more exotic than indigenous species. A higher probability of adoption and higher tree numbers were observed when male household members were exposed, and seedling provision enhanced tree numbers and species among adopters. Our findings underscore the need for continuous engagement of farmers and targeted gender-sensitive interventions. We also recommend a more structured approach to training and information dissemination, and a focus seedling availability and a suitable policy environment. </p></div>","PeriodicalId":7610,"journal":{"name":"Agroforestry Systems","volume":"99 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10457-025-01197-6.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agroforestry Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10457-025-01197-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Agroforestry, widely promoted across Sub-Saharan Africa to restore degraded landscapes and improve livelihoods, has the potential to positively impact Sustainable Development Goals (SDG), specifically SDG15 (life on land) and contribute towards the achievement of SDG2 (food security) and other SDGs. However, despite substantial investment in agroforestry programs, evidence of program effectiveness in enhancing adoption is inadequate. This paper employed the augmented inverse probability weighting method to analyze the impact of exposure to agroforestry practices on the adoption and intensity of tree planting using panel household data from Eastern Rwanda. The findings show that exposure increased the probability of adoption by 7% (p = 0.03). A higher probability of adoption (15%, p = 0.01) was observed in households that were exposed both before and after the baseline period, suggesting cumulative effects of exposure over time. Exposure modestly enhanced the diversity of trees and the number of trees in cropping fields, but farmers tended to adopt more exotic than indigenous species. A higher probability of adoption and higher tree numbers were observed when male household members were exposed, and seedling provision enhanced tree numbers and species among adopters. Our findings underscore the need for continuous engagement of farmers and targeted gender-sensitive interventions. We also recommend a more structured approach to training and information dissemination, and a focus seedling availability and a suitable policy environment.

暴露对卢旺达小农家庭采用和加强植树做法的作用
农林业在撒哈拉以南非洲得到广泛推广,以恢复退化的景观和改善生计,有可能对可持续发展目标(SDG)产生积极影响,特别是可持续发展目标15(陆地上的生命),并有助于实现可持续发展目标2(粮食安全)和其他可持续发展目标。然而,尽管农林业项目投入了大量资金,但项目在提高采用率方面的有效性证据不足。本文利用卢旺达东部的面板家庭数据,采用增广逆概率加权法分析农林业实践对植树采用率和强度的影响。研究结果表明,暴露使被采纳的可能性增加了7% (p = 0.03)。在基线期之前和之后都接触过的家庭中,观察到更高的采用概率(15%,p = 0.01),这表明随着时间的推移,接触的累积效应。暴露适度地增加了作物田树木的多样性和树木的数量,但农民倾向于采用更多的外来物种而不是本地物种。当男性家庭成员接触时,观察到更高的收养概率和更高的树数,并且幼苗提供增加了收养者的树数和物种。我们的研究结果强调了农民持续参与和有针对性的性别敏感干预措施的必要性。我们还建议对培训和信息传播采取更有组织的方法,重点关注种子的可得性和适当的政策环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agroforestry Systems
Agroforestry Systems 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
78
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Agroforestry Systems is an international scientific journal that publishes results of novel, high impact original research, critical reviews and short communications on any aspect of agroforestry. The journal particularly encourages contributions that demonstrate the role of agroforestry in providing commodity as well non-commodity benefits such as ecosystem services. Papers dealing with both biophysical and socioeconomic aspects are welcome. These include results of investigations of a fundamental or applied nature dealing with integrated systems involving trees and crops and/or livestock. Manuscripts that are purely descriptive in nature or confirmatory in nature of well-established findings, and with limited international scope are discouraged. To be acceptable for publication, the information presented must be relevant to a context wider than the specific location where the study was undertaken, and provide new insight or make a significant contribution to the agroforestry knowledge base
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信