A. P. Zharkova, D. A. Tovmasian, A. P. Chernyaev, A. V. Nechesnyuk, S. M. Varzar, A. A. Loginova
{"title":"Robustness of Radiotherapy Plans to Geometric Uncertainties in Irradiating Patients with High-Density Prostheses","authors":"A. P. Zharkova, D. A. Tovmasian, A. P. Chernyaev, A. V. Nechesnyuk, S. M. Varzar, A. A. Loginova","doi":"10.3103/S0027134925700067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The concept of introducing additional target margins has proven effective in photon radiotherapy and, therefore, is a widely accepted method for ensuring the required dose distribution during planning. However, due to the specific interactions of photon radiation with matter in cases of significant tissue heterogeneity, radiotherapy planning necessitates assessing the robustness of the plan or developing a plan resilient to existing dose delivery uncertainties. This study tested the robustness of radiotherapy plans to geometric uncertainties using two irradiation technologies: CRT (conformal radiation therapy) and IMRT (intensity-modulated radiation therapy). A total of 15 patient plans with metallic prostheses were analyzed. The patient’s position relative to the isocenter of the irradiation beams was geometrically shifted to simulate potential patient setup errors. Data on actual displacements obtained during pretreatment visualization—approximately 25 000 treatment fractions for patients with various tumor localizations—were analyzed. According to the results of the study, the probability of not achieving the required dose distribution for the clinical target volume is no more than <span>\\(0.04\\pm 0.03\\%\\)</span> when using the CRT technique and no more than <span>\\(7\\pm 4\\%\\)</span> when using IMRT. Thus, the CRT plans demonstrated greater robustness with respect to the target compared to IMRT plans. When IMRT techniques are required for treating patients with prostheses, increased attention must be paid to the patient’s setup and plan robustness verification.</p>","PeriodicalId":711,"journal":{"name":"Moscow University Physics Bulletin","volume":"80 1","pages":"145 - 151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Moscow University Physics Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.3103/S0027134925700067","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The concept of introducing additional target margins has proven effective in photon radiotherapy and, therefore, is a widely accepted method for ensuring the required dose distribution during planning. However, due to the specific interactions of photon radiation with matter in cases of significant tissue heterogeneity, radiotherapy planning necessitates assessing the robustness of the plan or developing a plan resilient to existing dose delivery uncertainties. This study tested the robustness of radiotherapy plans to geometric uncertainties using two irradiation technologies: CRT (conformal radiation therapy) and IMRT (intensity-modulated radiation therapy). A total of 15 patient plans with metallic prostheses were analyzed. The patient’s position relative to the isocenter of the irradiation beams was geometrically shifted to simulate potential patient setup errors. Data on actual displacements obtained during pretreatment visualization—approximately 25 000 treatment fractions for patients with various tumor localizations—were analyzed. According to the results of the study, the probability of not achieving the required dose distribution for the clinical target volume is no more than \(0.04\pm 0.03\%\) when using the CRT technique and no more than \(7\pm 4\%\) when using IMRT. Thus, the CRT plans demonstrated greater robustness with respect to the target compared to IMRT plans. When IMRT techniques are required for treating patients with prostheses, increased attention must be paid to the patient’s setup and plan robustness verification.
期刊介绍:
Moscow University Physics Bulletin publishes original papers (reviews, articles, and brief communications) in the following fields of experimental and theoretical physics: theoretical and mathematical physics; physics of nuclei and elementary particles; radiophysics, electronics, acoustics; optics and spectroscopy; laser physics; condensed matter physics; chemical physics, physical kinetics, and plasma physics; biophysics and medical physics; astronomy, astrophysics, and cosmology; physics of the Earth’s, atmosphere, and hydrosphere.