{"title":"Fiscal expenditure responsibilities of public–private partnerships and corporate innovation investment—evidence from prefecture-level cities in China","authors":"Fang Wang , Xinci Chen , Guochao Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.cjar.2025.100416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Many public–private partnership (PPP) projects in China are facing increased fiscal expenditure responsibilities and weakened fiscal capacity, which may hinder investment in corporate innovation. Using data from Chinese prefecture-level cities and listed firms from 2014 to 2020, we find that PPP fiscal expenditure responsibilities negatively affect firms’ current and future innovation investment by reducing government subsidies and increasing corporate taxes. This negative effect is more pronounced when PPP fiscal expenditure responsibilities exceed a certain threshold. It is also stronger when local governments have higher levels of debt and lower central transfer payments. The effect is also stronger if the PPP project’s return mechanism increases the government’s future fiscal expenditure responsibilities, but weaker if the project’s operating model revitalizes government assets. The effect on private firms, small firms, high-debt firms, and firms facing strong financing constraints is more pronounced. From the perspective of fiscal capacity, this paper explains the underlying reasons why the effectiveness of government support policies for corporate innovation varies. Additionally, it examines the negative impacts of the financing-oriented PPP model on corporate innovation investment, providing empirical evidence to support options for optimal PPP strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45688,"journal":{"name":"China Journal of Accounting Research","volume":"18 2","pages":"Article 100416"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Journal of Accounting Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755309125000127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Many public–private partnership (PPP) projects in China are facing increased fiscal expenditure responsibilities and weakened fiscal capacity, which may hinder investment in corporate innovation. Using data from Chinese prefecture-level cities and listed firms from 2014 to 2020, we find that PPP fiscal expenditure responsibilities negatively affect firms’ current and future innovation investment by reducing government subsidies and increasing corporate taxes. This negative effect is more pronounced when PPP fiscal expenditure responsibilities exceed a certain threshold. It is also stronger when local governments have higher levels of debt and lower central transfer payments. The effect is also stronger if the PPP project’s return mechanism increases the government’s future fiscal expenditure responsibilities, but weaker if the project’s operating model revitalizes government assets. The effect on private firms, small firms, high-debt firms, and firms facing strong financing constraints is more pronounced. From the perspective of fiscal capacity, this paper explains the underlying reasons why the effectiveness of government support policies for corporate innovation varies. Additionally, it examines the negative impacts of the financing-oriented PPP model on corporate innovation investment, providing empirical evidence to support options for optimal PPP strategies.
期刊介绍:
The focus of the China Journal of Accounting Research is to publish theoretical and empirical research papers that use contemporary research methodologies to investigate issues about accounting, corporate finance, auditing and corporate governance in the Greater China region, countries related to the Belt and Road Initiative, and other emerging and developed markets. The Journal encourages the applications of economic and sociological theories to analyze and explain accounting issues within the legal and institutional framework, and to explore accounting issues under different capital markets accurately and succinctly. The published research articles of the Journal will enable scholars to extract relevant issues about accounting, corporate finance, auditing and corporate governance related to the capital markets and institutional environment.