Transcorporeality and thick time in an era of climate uncertainty: relocation on the Island of Cardoso

IF 3.4 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Giovanna Gini
{"title":"Transcorporeality and thick time in an era of climate uncertainty: relocation on the Island of Cardoso","authors":"Giovanna Gini","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This ethnographic study focuses on the planned relocation of Enseada da Baleia, a small island fishing community on the south coast of Brazil. It examines the entangled mobilities of human and non-human agents—such as water and marine life—in the context of climate change. In 2016, following a cyclone and significant erosion of the sandspit where they had been living, the inhabitants of Enseada da Baleia relocated to a new site on Cardoso Island. The put the questions: how these geographic and ancestral mobilities support adaptation and continuity. It finds that the community’s relocation was not solely a material response. Nor did it represent a crisis and rupture as depicted in much of the climate migration literature. Instead, it reflects deeper temporal and spatial connections between the community, their ancestral lands, and non-human entities such as fish and trees. It suggests these connections are captured in the concept of ’thick time’ where past and futures are entangled in the present. This temporality includes ’transcorporeality,’ the impossibility of separating human bodies from non-human agents. This is central to understanding the decision to relocate to a place where their elders once lived. The relocation reestablished relationships with both material and immaterial aspects of their history, reinforcing their cultural continuity in the context of adaptation to climate change. The community’s relocation draws on ancestral knowledge to adapt to socio-environmental changes. In the case of Enseada, relocation operates as a culturally embedded adaptation strategy. Through this lens, the paper engages with broader debates on climate migration, decolonial approaches, and the politics of time, arguing that Enseada’s relocation represents a translocal adaptation process that opens political possibilities for decolonizing climate change agendas by emphasizing the intimacy of the relocation process.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"163 ","pages":"Article 104316"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718525001162","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This ethnographic study focuses on the planned relocation of Enseada da Baleia, a small island fishing community on the south coast of Brazil. It examines the entangled mobilities of human and non-human agents—such as water and marine life—in the context of climate change. In 2016, following a cyclone and significant erosion of the sandspit where they had been living, the inhabitants of Enseada da Baleia relocated to a new site on Cardoso Island. The put the questions: how these geographic and ancestral mobilities support adaptation and continuity. It finds that the community’s relocation was not solely a material response. Nor did it represent a crisis and rupture as depicted in much of the climate migration literature. Instead, it reflects deeper temporal and spatial connections between the community, their ancestral lands, and non-human entities such as fish and trees. It suggests these connections are captured in the concept of ’thick time’ where past and futures are entangled in the present. This temporality includes ’transcorporeality,’ the impossibility of separating human bodies from non-human agents. This is central to understanding the decision to relocate to a place where their elders once lived. The relocation reestablished relationships with both material and immaterial aspects of their history, reinforcing their cultural continuity in the context of adaptation to climate change. The community’s relocation draws on ancestral knowledge to adapt to socio-environmental changes. In the case of Enseada, relocation operates as a culturally embedded adaptation strategy. Through this lens, the paper engages with broader debates on climate migration, decolonial approaches, and the politics of time, arguing that Enseada’s relocation represents a translocal adaptation process that opens political possibilities for decolonizing climate change agendas by emphasizing the intimacy of the relocation process.
气候不确定时代的超实体和厚时间:卡多索岛的重新安置
这项民族志研究的重点是巴西南海岸的一个小岛渔业社区Enseada da Baleia的计划搬迁。它考察了在气候变化的背景下,人类和非人类因素(如水和海洋生物)相互纠缠的流动性。2016年,在他们居住的沙嘴遭受飓风和严重侵蚀之后,Enseada da Baleia的居民搬迁到Cardoso岛的新址。他们提出了这样的问题:这些地理和祖先的流动是如何支持适应和延续的?报告发现,该社区的搬迁不仅仅是一种物质上的回应。它也不像许多气候移民文献中描述的那样,代表着危机和破裂。相反,它反映了社区、祖先土地和非人类实体(如鱼和树)之间更深层次的时空联系。它表明,这些联系在“厚时间”的概念中被捕获,过去和未来在现在纠缠在一起。这种时间性包括“超物质性”,即人类身体与非人类主体分离的不可能性。这是理解搬迁到他们的长辈曾经居住过的地方的决定的核心。搬迁重建了他们与历史的物质和非物质方面的关系,在适应气候变化的背景下加强了他们的文化连续性。社区的重新安置利用了祖先的知识来适应社会环境的变化。在Enseada的案例中,搬迁是一种文化融入的适应策略。通过这一视角,本文对气候移民、非殖民化方法和时间政治进行了更广泛的讨论,认为恩西达的搬迁代表了一个跨地方的适应过程,通过强调搬迁过程的亲切性,为非殖民化气候变化议程开辟了政治可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geoforum
Geoforum GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
201
期刊介绍: Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信